How to read this page. Every count comes from the records on this page and links to where it is counted. Nothing is published until a person reads its source, and a figure no source gives reads Not disclosed; nothing is estimated. A rating changes only when a person sets it.
The 6 data centers in Utah County
Every Utah County record6 records · blank cell: not disclosed · sort by any column
Tier 1: an official or company source. Tier 2: a news report resolving to the outlet's own page. Located: a site coordinate from a permit, a parcel or an address, or the county or town centroid. Verified: the last day a person read the source. A blank cell means not disclosed by any source on file.
The cities in Utah County on the record (5)
5 of 5 cities have a record. A city without one is listed, not linked, until its first published record.
A blank rating cell means no person has set one for the city. A city without a record is listed, not linked.
What Utah County has decided3 bodies, 11 decisions on the record
What the county and the cities in it have done about data centers: each body on its own row with its rating, open, case by case, restrictive or closed, never good or bad, and every vote, ordinance, moratorium or agreement one tap away, newest first, with its source.
Body
Level
Rating
In force until
Latest act
Acts
Verified
Utah County
county
not rated
The Utah County Commission voted to approve a land use ordinance for data centers without taking public comment on Oct. 20, 2026.universe.byu.edu (opens in a new tab)news outlet · Oct 20 · 2 acts on this rowEvery act on the Utah County row
ordinance
The Utah County Commission voted to approve a land use ordinance for data centers without taking public comment on Oct. 20, 2026.
Utah County Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of Application #2026-09 proposing amendments to UCLUO Sections 8.132, 2.08, 10.04, 12.28, 12.40, and 12.72 establishing a Data Center Overlay (DCO) Zone in Mining and Grazing (M&G-1) and Industrial (I-2) zones, advancing to the Board of County Commissioners for final adoption.
Meta and Google received tax incentives or breaks for data centers in Eagle Mountain.sltrib.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Aug 22, 2026 · 3 acts on this rowEvery act on the Eagle Mountain row
event
Eagle Mountain walked back its first tax hike but residents will still pay about double the old rate
Spanish Fork City Council voted to approve changes to city code for a data center.ksl.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Sep 24, 2026 · 6 acts on this rowEvery act on the Spanish Fork row
event
Spanish Fork City Council members limited the city to only one data center unless city leaders vote to change that in the future.
After a six hour public hearing, Spanish Fork City Council tabled a vote on Title 15 amendments that would set rules for self powered data centers until September 1.
Reported: the source's date; the item names no day of its own. A rating rests only on a binding act in force; "not rated" means no person has set one. A blank cell means the record holds nothing for it.
62 more on this page, one per speaker and claim; 70 statements in all
One woman was booked into the Utah County Jail and two other attendees were cited following the disturbance at the Utah County Planning Commission meeting. The woman refused to leave, argued with deputies, and struck a deputy in the groin while being removed from a row of chairs as two others grabbed her, after which she and a deputy went to the ground; Provo Fire Department EMS evaluated her for reported jaw pain and found no immediate emergency injuries.
Tensions rose after the vote as residents yelled in opposition to the ordinance allowing data centers in Mining and Grazing and Industrial zones. A protester forced to the ground and arrested by deputies was not being vocal when taken into custody, and her treatment was unjust.
Volition claims its data center would use natural gas powered fuel cells producing substantially lower emissions and heat and requiring significantly less water than traditional data centers
Residents opposed the proposal, with Tom Thomas stating residents deserve more than unsubstantiated promises and citing data centers' documented track record of water contamination, air pollution, and noise pollution
Author Allyson Flake Matsoso expresses concerns about data centers changing small town America, citing impacts like noise, traffic, heat and light pollution
Mona City government said they had not received any formal data center application or development requests and have not made a commitment of water, sewer, or electricity for this data center
Called the Volition proposal an opportunity for the city and said it warrants moving forward to see if a private business can deliver on what it proposes, with guard rails in place.
Spanish Fork resident voiced concern about proper hard lined bylaws to ensure company cannot override community protections if acquired by larger corporation
Volition CEO Jeff Chavez stated the company generates their own power using natural gas powered fuel cells that do not connect to the existing power grid
Volition CEO Jeff Chavez said the proposed facility would use two households' worth of water to fill when first starting operations, then only one household's worth annually
Property owner John Bankhead stated he has received many offers for the warehouse site and considers Volition a better option than a distribution center that would increase truck traffic
Volition CEO Jeff Chavez said their data center project would generate about 250 megawatts of power and use an existing distribution center of about 28 acres
Volition plans to create a community fund contributing at least $500,000 per year for addiction recovery, food security, housing support and other community needs
Facility would generate its own power with natural gas fuel cells, never connect to the grid, use closed loop cooling with a one time 500,000 gal fill and 250,000 gal per year, and request no tax breaks.
Jack Urquhart, Spanish Fork communications manager, explained the municipal code amendment is needed because the developer proposes generating its own power
Volition officials stated their data center will not strain local resources due to being self powered, will be in an existing building, and will have reduced emissions and increased property tax revenue
Volition officials stated their data center will not strain local resources due to being self powered, will have no diesel generation, is dry cooled, and has noise limits
Converting the existing industrial building to a data center reduces traffic from 3,500 trucks per month to 100-200 employee car trips per day with zero heavy truck traffic
65 miles awayCarbon County: 1 data center on the record.
114 miles awayUintah County: 1 data center on the record.
127 miles awayBox Elder County: 1 data center on the record. A pause is on the record.
Distances run between the centers the Census Bureau gives each place. Every Utah county.
Disclosed figures
250 MW power, water from 1 record
Power, water, jobs and tax, summed only where a data center disclosed the figure; what each facility is for; how each is cooled. Nothing here is estimated.
Power, water, jobs and tax
Figure
Disclosed total
Disclosed
Without a figure
Basis
Power
250 MW
1
5
1 the developer's figure
Water, stated per year
250,000 gallons a year
1
5
1 the developer's figure
Permanent jobs
0
6
Tax each year
$40,000,000 to $44,000,000
1
5
1 the developer's figure
A blank total means no record disclosed the figure; the count without one says how many.
Summed only where a record disclosed the figure; a record with no figure adds nothing and is counted as not disclosed. Water is summed per day and per year separately, as the sources stated it, and never converted. A tax claim given as a range is summed at both ends.
By what the facilities are for
Use
Records
Power
Water
Jobs
Tax each year
AI, type not stated
1
250 MW
250,000 gallons a year
$40,000,000 to $44,000,000
No stated use
5
A blank cell means no record with that use disclosed the figure.
A record that lists several uses counts once under each. Each cell is the sum over the records with that use, disclosed rows only.
What the facilities are for
Use
Facilities
Share of facilities
Attributed MW
Share of attributed MW
AI, type not stated
1
17%
250 MW
100%
No stated use
5
83%
No capacity figure
5
83%
A blank cell means no source attributes power to that use.
6 facilities in Utah County. Capacity is attributed to a use only where a source states the share, or where a facility lists a single use. Nothing is divided by estimate.
How the facilities are cooled
No source on file states how any of the 6 tracked facilities in Utah County are cooled.
Sources read for Utah County
1 source
1 source is read for Utah County. State and national sources are on the Utah page.
Agendas and notices
Spanish Fork public notices
Every feed, with its kind and tier
What is read for Utah County: feeds every four hours, pages daily. A headline from any of these becomes a record only after a person reads the source and publishes it.
FiguresOnly what a source states, with its basis. Nothing is estimated, and a figure no source gives reads not disclosed.
LicenseData CC BY-NC 4.0 (opens in a new tab); free for personal, academic, civic and newsroom reporting with attribution. Commercial, enterprise, financial or AI training use needs a commercial license. Prose stays under copyright.
Cite this pageData Center Record, "Data centers in Utah County, Utah", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/ut/utah-county, updated October 26, 2026.CSV · JSON
Data Center Record, "Data center records in Utah County, Utah", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/ut/utah-county. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY-NC 4.0.
The structured rows are CC BY-NC 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.