Wisconsin decides case by case. From the state's own rule: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources found Vantage will meet air pollution limits and granted preliminary approval for air pollution control permits, April 15, 2026.
1 site the EPA's registry shows and no record has verified is on the map apart from the count. What not yet verified means.
How to read this page. Every count comes from the records on this page and links to where it is counted. Nothing is published until a person reads its source, and a figure no source gives reads Not disclosed; nothing is estimated. A rating changes only when a person sets it.
A blank cell means not disclosed by any source on file. Power is the developer's figure or a permit's, each linked on the record. All 7 Wisconsin projects.
Every Wisconsin record7 records, and 1 site not yet verified listed apart · sort by any column · blank cell: not disclosed
Tier 1: an official or company source. Tier 2: a news report resolving to the outlet's own page. Located: a site coordinate from a permit, a parcel or an address, or the county or town centroid. Verified: the last day a person read the source. A blank cell means not disclosed by any source on file.
Every Wisconsin county (72)
6 of 72 counties have a record. A county without one is listed, not linked, until its first published record.
A blank rating cell means no person has set one for the county. A county without a record is listed, not linked.
60 counties with no records yet
Adams County
Ashland County
Barron County
Bayfield County
Buffalo County
Burnett County
Calumet County
Chippewa County
Clark County
Crawford County
Door County
Douglas County
Dunn County
Eau Claire County
Florence County
Fond du Lac County
Forest County
Grant County
Green County
Green Lake County
Iowa County
Iron County
Jackson County
Juneau County
Kenosha County
Kewaunee County
La Crosse County
Lafayette County
Langlade County
Lincoln County
Manitowoc County
Marinette County
Marquette County
Menominee County
Monroe County
Oconto County
Oneida County
Outagamie County
Pepin County
Pierce County
Polk County
Portage County
Price County
Richland County
Rusk County
Sauk County
Sawyer County
Sheboygan County
St. Croix County
Taylor County
Trempealeau County
Vernon County
Vilas County
Walworth County
Washburn County
Washington County
Waukesha County
Waupaca County
Waushara County
Winnebago County
The rules in Wisconsin16 rows · rating rests only on a binding act in force
What the state and its counties and cities have decided. Each row is rated by what it has decided, open, case by case, restrictive or closed, never by whether that is good or bad.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources found Vantage will meet air pollution limits and granted preliminary approval for air pollution control permits.wpr.org (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Apr 15, 2026 · 18 acts on this rowEvery act on the Wisconsin row
litigation
Ozaukee County Circuit Court Judge Adam Gerol dismissed the lawsuit by Great Lakes Neighbors United challenging the tax increment district.
Port Washington created a tax increment district (TID No. 5) to support a $15 billion data center campus being developed by Vantage Data Centers, OpenAI and Oracle.
Alliant Energy submitted application September 4, 2026 to create a standard utility wide electric rate for large load customers of at least 100 megawatts, artificial intelligence data centers
The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin unanimously voted on Thursday to revoke a completeness determination for American Transmission Co.'s application to build a major distribution and interconnection project.
The Wisconsin Public Service Commission directed ATC to resubmit the application in August 2026 after finding the original design was incomplete and had undergone multiple revisions.
Sierra Club filed lawsuit in Ozaukee County Circuit Court on July 10, 2026 challenging DNR decision not to require environmental impact statement for Vantage Port Washington data center
Midwest Environmental Advocates and Sierra Club Wisconsin sued the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources over the decision to issue permits without an environmental impact statement
The Port Washington City Council in November approved a resolution creating a tax increment district to fund around $175 million in infrastructure improvements to serve the data center development.wpr.org (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Feb 13, 2026 · 16 acts on this rowEvery act on the Port Washington row
referendum
Port Washington voters approved referendum requiring future tax incremental districts with project costs or base value of at least $10 million receive voter approval before moving forward
The Port Washington City Council in November approved a resolution creating a tax increment district to fund around $175 million in infrastructure improvements to serve the data center development.
Columbia County Board adopted policy in July prohibiting supervisors from signing nondisclosure agreements regarding data centers.theameryfreepress.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · July 2026 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Columbia County row
event
Columbia County Board adopted policy in July prohibiting supervisors from signing nondisclosure agreements regarding data centers
Village of Cottage Grove passed a one year data center moratorium in July.hngnews.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · July 2026 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Cottage Grove row
moratorium adopted
Village of Cottage Grove passed a one year data center moratorium in July
Dane County imposed a data center moratorium.wispolitics.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · Reported Jun 9 · 2 acts on this rowEvery act on the Dane County row
The Janesville City Council unanimously passed a one year data center moratorium.channel3000.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · Sep 29 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Janesville row
moratorium adopted
The Janesville City Council unanimously passed a one year data center moratorium
Jefferson County passed a data center moratorium this summer, applicable to towns subject to county zoning.hngnews.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · Reported Sep 3 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Jefferson County row
moratorium adopted
Jefferson County passed a data center moratorium this summer, applicable to towns subject to county zoning
Madison passed a moratorium on AI data centers amid concerns about water use and high energy demands.civicmedia.us (opens in a new tab)primary source · Aug 25, 2026 · 2 acts on this rowEvery act on the Madison row
moratorium adopted
Madison passed a moratorium on AI data centers amid concerns about water use and high energy demands
Marathon County Board approved on Aug. 25 a 12 month moratorium on data center development in townships governed by county zoning.wausaupilotandreview.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · Aug 25, 2026 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Marathon County row
moratorium adopted
Marathon County Board approved on Aug. 25 a 12 month moratorium on data center development in townships governed by county zoning
City of Milton implemented an 18 month moratorium on data centers.hngnews.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · Reported Sep 3 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Milton row
moratorium
City of Milton implemented an 18 month moratorium on data centers
Milwaukee City Plan Commission held public hearing and discussion on proposed one year moratorium on new data center developments.wtmj.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Sep 28 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Milwaukee row
moratorium
Milwaukee City Plan Commission held public hearing and discussion on proposed one year moratorium on new data center developments
An ordinance passed by Port Washington voters would require future tax incremental districts with project costs or a base value of at least $10 million to receive approval from voters before they can move forward.wpr.org (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Reported Sep 22 · 4 acts on this rowEvery act on the Ozaukee County row
ordinance
An ordinance passed by Port Washington voters would require future tax incremental districts with project costs or a base value of at least $10 million to receive approval from voters before they can move forward
Sun Prairie City Council unanimously approved a one year moratorium on new or expanded data centers larger than 10,000 square feet, unless an accessory use to an existing business, effective September 1.hngnews.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · Reported Sep 3 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Sun Prairie row
moratorium adopted
Sun Prairie City Council unanimously approved a one year moratorium on new or expanded data centers larger than 10,000 square feet, unless an accessory use to an existing business, effective September 1
Public hearing on data center moratorium held in Tigerton with residents raising concerns about wildlife impacts and noise pollution.wsau.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Reported Sep 16 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Tigerton row
moratorium
Public hearing on data center moratorium held in Tigerton with residents raising concerns about wildlife impacts and noise pollution
Wisconsin Rapids enacted 12 month moratorium on data center construction with additional restrictions on future data centers.wsaw.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Oct 21 · 8 acts on this rowEvery act on the Wisconsin Rapids row
moratorium adopted
Wisconsin Rapids enacted 12 month moratorium on data center construction with additional restrictions on future data centers.
Wisconsin Rapids Plan Commission unanimously recommended denying the conditional use permit for the proposed data center at the former paper mill site.
Wisconsin Rapids Planning Commission voted September 16 to deny both the conditional use permit and site plan application for PNK Group data center campus on former paper mill property along Fourth Avenue North.
South Wood County Neighbors for Responsible Development held a public forum on hyperscale data centers at Lincoln High School Performing Arts Center on Monday at 6:30 PM
Reported: the source's date; the item names no day of its own. A month with no day: the source names the month and not the day. A rating rests only on a binding act in force; "not rated" means no person has set one. A blank cell means the record holds nothing for it.
12 bills tracked in the Wisconsin legislature, none signed into law yet, grouped by where each stands. A row opens its own page; the Wisconsin laws page has what each law requires.
An Act to create 66.1105 (17) (c) of the statutes; Relating to: tax incremental financing districts containing qualified data centers. (FE) As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
An Act to renumber and amend 238.40 (1) (b) 1.; to amend 238.40 (1) (b) (intro.); to create 238.40 (1) (b) 1. b. and 238.40 (1) (bm) of the statutes; Relating to: modifying the sales and use tax exemption for qualified data centers. (FE) As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
An Act to amend 16.957 (2) (d) 3., 25.96 and 238.40 (2) (b); to create 16.296, 16.957 (2) (a) 5., 20.505 (1) (gj), 66.0443, 101.028, 103.08, 196.03 (7), 196.03 (8), 196.493, 196.498, 238.40 (1) (am) and 238.40 (1) (b) 3. of the statutes; Relating to: large energy customer fees; electric utility very large customer class; a renewable resource tariff; building requirements for data centers; water usage by large customers; required pay rate on large scale data center projects; and granting rule making authority. (FE) As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
An Act to create 196.20 (10), 196.492 and 299.70 of the statutes; Relating to: certain requirements related to data centers. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
An Act to create 66.10015 (1) (ag), 66.10015 (7) and 134.89 of the statutes; Relating to: prohibiting nondisclosure agreements intended to conceal information about a data center from the public. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Large energy customer fees; electric utility very large customer class; a renewable resource tariff; building requirements for data centers; water usage by large customers; required pay rate on large-scale data center projects; and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Large energy customer fees; electric utility very large customer class; a renewable resource tariff; building requirements for data centers; water usage by large customers; required pay rate on large-scale data center projects; and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Prohibiting nondisclosure agreements intended to conceal information about a data center from the public.
12 bills tracked in Wisconsin; May 2026 Special Session, legislature adjourned; last checked October 26, 2026. The last check found no bill not already tracked; the 12 tracked bills stand. Search terms: data center, data centre, large load, hyperscale, computing facility, server farm, high load factor (indirect), energy intensive facility (indirect), large electric load (indirect), digital asset mining (indirect), cryptocurrency mining (indirect), qualified technology facility (indirect), colocation (indirect), moratorium (with another term), sales tax exemption (with another term). The search on LegiScan. (opens in a new tab)
H.R. 9340, Ratepayer Protection Act: U.S. House of Representatives, roll call 312, September 16, 2026. On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended. Passed, 417 to 3. Wisconsin's members: 7 yea, 0 nay, 1 present or not voting. How each member voted
Member
Party
Position
Fitzgerald
R
Yea
Grothman
R
Yea
Moore (WI)
D
Yea
Pocan
D
Yea
Steil
R
Yea
Tiffany
R
Not Voting
Van Orden
R
Yea
Wied
R
Yea
A blank party cell means the clerk's roll gives none.
H.R. 9340, Ratepayer Protection Act: U.S. Senate, roll call 254, September 30, 2026. On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed H.R. 9340. Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected, 57 to 43. Wisconsin's members: 1 yea, 1 nay. How each member voted
Member
Party
Position
Baldwin (D-WI)
D
Nay
Johnson (R-WI)
R
Yea
A blank party cell means the clerk's roll gives none.
You take just the Mount Pleasant and Port Washington sites, it would take 100,000 acres of solar panels in order to power them. That's crazy to do that. That's going to raise our electricity rates but it's also ultimately going to raise our food costs because it's going to sideline some of our beautiful farmland here in Wisconsin.
Becky Valcq, president of Alliant Energy's Wisconsin energy company and former chair of the state Public Service Commission, cautioned county leaders on rejecting data centers
"If we let them build it and it is a really horrible data center, we are living with it for the next 20, 50, 70 years. And we don't want that for the community, if we can help it on the front end. Build it right the first time, and we'll be OK"
Charles Franklin, director of the Marquette Law School Poll, called voter opposition to data centers a 'real paradox' and said he remains skeptical data centers will be a pivotal issue in the election.
State Rep. Clint Moses said he would add WEDC to legislation banning data center NDAs that he plans to introduce in January after a new governor and Legislature take office
"make sure that this is fertile ground for entrepreneurs and businesses to either stay or move right here to the state of Wisconsin. I do think that data centers play a huge role…. “There’s an opportunity for us to really become an AI and a data hub not only for the entire country, but for the entire globe."
In January, he called data centers “exciting new technology.” In August, Tiffany said data centers are needed to keep technology from being outsourced to China, WSAW TV reported .
Michael Timm, incumbent alderman, said he supported the 12 month moratorium to understand impacts and put strong protections in place, and believes any future data center must pay its fair share including property taxes without subsidizing electricity costs.
Rusty Brown, a candidate for Wisconsin Rapids city council District 7, said he is strongly opposed to hyperscale data centers, citing that they bring very few jobs to the community and that the moratorium must be enacted so local government has time to protect citizens.
Fred Clark, Democrat and former state lawmaker, said data centers need state and federal regulations to protect communities from environmental and financial risks, calling for protection of water resources and that consumers of energy are held harmless by the huge power demand these things generate
Michael Alfonso, Republican candidate, said local communities should decide whether to allow data centers and opposed federal government involvement in telling municipalities what they can and cannot do
Erik Severson, Republican candidate for State Senate in Wisconsin's 25th Senate District, endorsed LRB 6903/1, legislation that would eliminate sales and use tax exemptions for data centers
Charles Franklin, director of the Marquette Law School Poll, said opposition to data centers is coming from a broader doubt about the technology rather than specifically whether one is in your own backyard
Kevin Knoke, Democratic challenger in 30th Assembly District, said he wants ratepayer protections, environmental protections, transparency, and accountability for data centers
Republican Assemblyman Shannon Zimmerman authored 2023 legislation resulting in a tax exemption for data center equipment and software, backed by Microsoft, business groups and several utilities.
Not on the record: the record holds no bill called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Read from the statement's words: Derrick Van Orden voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Checked against the bills and roll calls the record holds.
Context & source notes
Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.
Derrick Van Orden claims Rebecca Cooke worked with Wisconsin Technology Council and Third Way and is responsible for data centers in Mount Pleasant and Beaver Dam
Rep. Derrick Van Orden stated that Wisconsin families should not be stuck paying higher utility bills to subsidize massive energy demands from data centers and that if a company needs massive amounts of power, Wisconsin families should not be left holding the bill
Rep. Derrick Van Orden voted for the Ratepayer Protection Act requiring data center companies to pay the full cost of energy generation, transmission and distribution upgrades; stated Wisconsin families should not subsidize data center energy demands and that companies needing massive power should bear those costs
Confirmed by the record: Van Orden voted Yea on H.R. 9340, U.S. House of Representatives roll call 312, September 16, 2026. Read from the statement's words: Derrick Van Orden voted for the Ratepayer Protection Act. Checked against the roll call the record holds on the bill, as the clerk printed it.
Dennis and Susan Ryan propose that Wisconsin's next governor should require efficient brain inspired technology be installed in all existing and proposed data centers.
City staff recommendation cited delay and postponement from original submission in April, high public concern and missing standards and conditions, and multiple inconsistencies across submitted materials.
Dennis and Susan Ryan recommend an intermediate solution to mitigate detrimental effects from data centers on electrical grid, water supply and environment.
Congressman Derrick Van Orden voted yes on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, which requires state utility regulators to ensure large load customers cover the full incremental costs of generation, transmission, and distribution upgrades
Confirmed by the record: Van Orden voted Yea on H.R. 9340, U.S. House of Representatives roll call 312, September 16, 2026. Read from the statement's words: Derrick Van Orden voted for H.R. 9340. Checked against the roll call the record holds on the bill, as the clerk printed it.
Summer Strand, PSC Chair, stated the decision was not opposition to data centers but rather that the application represented a cautionary tale of unrealistic speed to power expectations colliding with a deliberative regulatory process.
Committee concerns include protection of electrical ratepayers, land use, wetland preservation, water resources, energy and water efficiency standards, noise pollution, and infrastructure costs
Kristy Nieto, Public Service Commission Commissioner, stated existing Wisconsin customers should not pay a single cent to subsidize data center service
Data centers use enormous amounts of water, electricity, and land, and can create noise, generator impacts, road impacts and major impacts on surrounding communities
Build Wisconsin Better announced mission to bring Wisconsinites together and help communities ask questions, get information and have a say before decisions about data center development become permanent
Casey Bradley, City Administrator, stated the purpose of the education series is for city officials and residents to learn about data center impacts while drafting zoning ordinances to manage data centers, should they come to Sheboygan; no project is currently planned
Becky Valcq, President of Alliant Energy's Wisconsin electric company and Vice President of Energy Delivery, spoke at an educational session about data centers
Emily Pritzkow, head of Wisconsin Building Trades Council, wrote in December 2025 op ed that data center construction creates opportunities for thousands of Wisconsinites and this is work that builds the middle class
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139, Wisconsin Carpenters, and Steamfitters Local 601 also made five figure donations to Crowley's campaign
David Crowley stated that local communities should have control over whether data center projects are built nearby and any data center should be built by union labor
Not on the record: the record holds no bill called the SPEED Act. Read from the statement's words: Tom Tiffany voted for the SPEED Act. Checked against the bills and roll calls the record holds.
Context & source notes
Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.
Not on the record: the record holds no bill called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Read from the statement's words: Tom Tiffany voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Checked against the bills and roll calls the record holds.
Context & source notes
Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.
Kaitlyn Federwitz, co founder of South Wood County Neighbors for Responsible Development, called for the strongest data center ordinance in Wisconsin and a moratorium.
On Sept. 23, a Vantage official texted Port Washington Mayor Ted Neitzke about the governor's office seeking more information on why an EIS would kill the project
Michael Timm, alderman of Wisconsin Rapids, emailed Hotel Mead expressing concern that anti data center signs being sold there would alienate customers and hurt the business.
Manske also wants to ban or heavily regulate data center developments and said he took time off of work to protest the Vantage Data Centers project in Port Washington.
Rep. David Steffen, chair of the Committee on Energy and Utilities, said legislation aimed at getting regulations for data centers set into place can be expected next session
Vantage said backup generators are intended for emergencies and required testing and maintenance, running monthly with no more than four generators for 15 minutes, annually one at a time for an hour, and for 15 minutes to validate repairs
Vantage said generators will primarily be used one or a few at a time during monthly testing, well below DNR's established limit of 50 hours per generator annually
Mark Freeman, Vice President of Global Marketing for Vantage Data Centers, said the company is committed to working with the city on construction alignment
Port Mayor Ted Neitzke said 24 hour exterior construction would end in about a month, ending exterior 24 hour work weeks earlier than Vantage anticipated end of May
U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany, a Republican candidate for governor, said the state must find a new template for how Wisconsin deals with energy and data centers to avoid harming existing ratepayers and manufacturers.
State Sen. Kelda Roys, a Democratic candidate, said Wisconsin needs a statewide strategy to deal with data centers and has sponsored legislation with Sen. Jodi Habush Sinykin to ensure transparency in data center negotiations.
Former Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, a Democratic candidate, said if data centers are built in Wisconsin there must be a community benefits agreement, local hiring, protected utility rates for customers, and community input prioritized.
Former Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation CEO Missy Hughes, a Democratic candidate, said she has experience negotiating with big data centers and would be hands on in protecting Wisconsin ratepayers and environment while seizing technology investment opportunities.
former Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation CEO and Democratic gubernatorial candidate PBS Wisconsin (opens in a new tab)local outlet
Context & source notes
Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.
State Rep. Francesca Hong, a Democratic candidate, said she is not interested in the state providing subsidies and handouts for large corporations that would impact clean lakes and air.
Microsoft's data center campus in Mount Pleasant and Port Washington data center would use more power than all homes in Wisconsin, according to Clean Wisconsin analysis.
Which counties and cities in Wisconsin have rules about data centers?
15 county and city rows are on the record, 3 of them rated: Port Washington is rated case by case: The Port Washington City Council in November approved a resolution creating a tax increment district to fund around $175 million in infrastructure improvements to serve the data center development, February 13, 2026, source (opens in a new tab), Madison is rated restrictive: Madison passed a moratorium on AI data centers amid concerns about water use and high energy demands, August 25, 2026, source (opens in a new tab) and Marathon County is rated restrictive: Marathon County Board approved on Aug. 25 a 12 month moratorium on data center development in townships governed by county zoning, source (opens in a new tab). The state's own row is rated case by case, with 18 dated acts listed under the scorecard. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers
answered from the rows above
What is proposed or being built near me in Wisconsin, by county?
No bill on data centers has been signed into law in Wisconsin yet. 12 bills are tracked under Laws. The state's own scorecard row carries 18 dated acts, the newest reported September 23, 2026. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers
answered from the rows above
Disclosed figures
902 MW power, 1,000 jobs
summed only where a record disclosed the figure
Figure
Disclosed total
Disclosed
Without a figure
Basis
Power
902 MW
1
6
1 the developer's figure
Water, stated per day
0
7
Water, stated per year
0
7
Permanent jobs
1,000 jobs
1
6
1 the developer's figure
Tax each year
0
7
A blank cell means no record in Wisconsin disclosed the figure. Third party figures on the same metrics are listed apart below; a figure a project disclosed about itself is never mixed with them.
Figure
Disclosed total
Disclosed
Without a figure
Basis
Power
902 MW
1
6
1 the developer's figure
Water, stated per day
0
7
Water, stated per year
0
7
Permanent jobs
1,000 jobs
1
6
1 the developer's figure
Tax each year
0
7
A blank total means no record disclosed the figure; the count without one says how many.
Summed only where a record disclosed the figure; a record with no figure adds nothing and is counted as not disclosed. Water is summed per day and per year separately, as the sources stated it, and never converted. A tax claim given as a range is summed at both ends.
The disclosed totals are in the table above.
No source on file states what any of the 7 tracked facilities in Wisconsin are for. 1 site not yet verified is named apart and is not in that number.
What each use disclosed
Use
Records
Power
Water
Jobs
Tax each year
No stated use
7
902 MW
1,000 jobs
A blank cell means no record with that use disclosed the figure.
A record that lists several uses counts once under each. Each cell is the sum over the records with that use, disclosed rows only.
No source on file states how any of the 7 tracked facilities in Wisconsin are cooled. 1 site not yet verified is named apart and is not in that number.
Sources read for Wisconsin
13 sources
13 sources are read for Wisconsin:
Newspapers
Wisconsin State Journal
Public broadcaster
Wisconsin Public Radio
Economic development
Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation
Search feeds
10 news searches
Every feed, with its kind and tier
What the monitor reads for Wisconsin: feeds every four hours, pages daily.
FiguresOnly what a source states, with its basis. Nothing is estimated, and a figure no source gives reads not disclosed.
LicenseData CC BY-NC 4.0 (opens in a new tab); free for personal, academic, civic and newsroom reporting with attribution. Commercial, enterprise, financial or AI training use needs a commercial license. Prose stays under copyright.
Cite this pageData Center Record, "Data centers in Wisconsin", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/wi, updated October 25, 2026.CSV · JSON · GeoJSON
Data Center Record, "Data center records in Wisconsin", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/wi. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY-NC 4.0.
The structured rows are CC BY-NC 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.
reported 1, proposed 2, being built 1, running 3, not yet verified 1
Located records
1 located, 6 at a centroid, 0 without coordinates
Researcher view · Wisconsin · 7 data center sites, 4 buildings where disclosed, 16 rule rows, 12 bills · basis and source tier on every row · verified October 25, 2026