Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty argued that transmission line plans would destroy the landscape that shaped Tom Uttech's artistic career
Vantage Port Washington Data Center
A Vantage data center in Port Washington faces disputes over energy cost allocation, a state regulatory rejection of its power line project, and an environmental lawsuit filed against the Wisconsin DNR over the project's environmental review. It is being built, as reported August 6, 2026.
How much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.
How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.
What is known
Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.
- Land
- Not disclosed
- Power it would draw
- 1 GW
- not disclosed
- Water
- Not disclosed
- Reported by others: 11,000 gallons per day (Ozaukee Press); 10,000 gallons per day (Milwaukee Business News). Their figure, not the record's.
- Who leads it
- Vantage
- as stated by the source
- Who would use it
- Not disclosed
- Jobs once it runs
- Not disclosed
- Tax each year
- Not disclosed
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)
Impact figures
| Field | Value | Who says so | Source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How much power it needs | 1 GW | not disclosed | September 25, 2026 | |
| How much water it would use | Not disclosed | |||
| How loud it would be | Not disclosed | |||
| Jobs once it runs | Not disclosed | |||
| Tax it would pay each year | Not disclosed |
The record's fields
| Field | Value | Who says so | Source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who is building it | Vantage | as stated by the source | September 25, 2026 | |
| Who is constructing it | Not disclosed | |||
| How much land | Not disclosed | |||
| Where its power comes from | Not disclosed | |||
| Grid connection | Not disclosed | |||
| How it is cooled | Not disclosed |
How much power it needs, also reported: 3.5 GW, 2026 (wpr.org: The project could require up to 3.5 gigawatts of electricity in the future, wpr.org: Roughly 670 acre campus could need up to 3.5 gigawatts of electricity); 5.4 GW, 2026 (wpr.org: Environmental groups say data centers are driving construction of 5.4 gigawatts of new or updated gas fired power plants); 3 GW, 2026 (wpr.org: We Energies proposing to add almost 3 gigawatts of power to meet data center energy demand); 2,000 MW, 2026 (TMJ4 News: Vantage says it is paying for the buildout of 2,000 megawatts of energy); 1,400 MW, 2026 (TMJ4 News: The Port Washington facility will require 1,400 megawatts of power); 1.3 GW, 2026 (wpr.org: The first phase of the project would use 1.3 gigawatts of energy, enough to power 640,000 homes); 902 MW, 2026 (Spectrum News: Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus in Port Washington will have four data centers totaling 902 megawatts of critical IT load); 1.3 GW, 2025 (Ozaukee Press: 1.3 gigawatts of power capacity for Lighthouse Campus, Milwaukee Business News: Expected power use is 1.3 gigawatts with later phases potentially up to 3.5 gigawatts) .
How much water it would use, also reported: 11,000 gallons per day, 2025 (Ozaukee Press: 11,000 gallons of water per day usage at Lighthouse Campus); 10,000 gallons per day, 2025 (Milwaukee Business News: Expected to use up to 10,000 gallons of water per day for cooling operations) .
Jobs once it runs, also reported: 1,000 jobs, 2026 (Wisconsin Public Radio: 1,000 permanent jobs will be at the campus once operational, TMJ4 News: Vantage expects a combined 1,000 employees with its two biggest customers once the Port Washington facility opens., TMJ4 News: Vantage expects 1,000 employees on site at Port Washington facility when combined with customers Oracle and OpenAI, WLUK: Project Lighthouse is expected to provide 1,000 permanent jobs); 4,000 jobs, 2026 (wpr.org: Data center campus could create more than 4,000 construction jobs and more than 1,000 permanent positions, Urban Milwaukee: 4,000 construction workers are working on the project and 1,000 permanent jobs will be at the campus once it is operational, TMJ4 News: Vantage predicting 4,000 construction jobs); 5,000 jobs, 2026 (Ozaukee Press: Workforce expected to reach 5,000 going into winter, Ozaukee Press: Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus workforce increased to approximately 5,000 workers in summer 2026); 1,700 workers, 2026 (Ozaukee Press: Approximately 1,700 workers on site at time of ceremony); 130 workers, 2026 (TMJ4 News: Vantage currently employs about 130 workers at a campus location in Virginia.); 4,000 jobs, 2025 (wpr.org: Vantage said campus could create more than 4,000 construction jobs); 700 jobs, 2025 (wpr.org: OpenAI and Oracle will have around 700 jobs at campus, with Vantage having around 330 employees); 300 jobs, 2025 (Milwaukee Business News: Vantage plans to employ about 300 people at the data center, with tenant companies expected to employ an additional 700); 200 workers, 2025 (Milwaukee Business News: Expected to create thousands of construction jobs, with about 200 workers in 2025, 3,500 in 2026, 5,000 in 2027, and 2,000 in 2028) .
Tax it would pay each year, also reported: 458,000,000 USD, 2026 (wpr.org: The TID provides property tax reimbursement and interest payments to the developer totaling more than $458 million over the next 18 years., TMJ4 News: Vantage will pay property taxes in Port Washington over the next 20 years through a Tax Incremental District to cover $458 million in infrastructure costs for the project.); 1,500,000,000 USD, 2026 (thecentersquare.com: Data centers are beneficiary of estimated $1.5 billion in initial foregone state sales tax from four data center projects); 65,000,000 USD, 2026 (TMJ4 News: Vantage has paid $65 million in property taxes in Virginia since 2019.); 30,000,000 USD, 2026 (wpr.org: If the project delivers on the property value increases estimated in the city's project plan, Port Washington and other local taxing authorities would see an increase of more than $30 million annually in tax revenue from the project.) .
The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.
Still not public, and where it would show up
The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.
- Water useA state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
- Who would use itA lease announcement or a tenant named in a filing.
- Jobs and taxAn incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.
What was decided
Acts of Ozaukee County and Port Washington about data centers, on the record with their source. A rule about the area is not a decision about this record.
| Date | Who | Decision | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ozaukee County | Enhanced pedestrian control signal and lane widening at Highland Lane and Highland Drive intersection | ozaukeepress.com | |
| Ozaukee County | County widening lanes at I-43 ramps and Highway LL, creating dedicated turn lanes | ozaukeepress.com | |
| Ozaukee County | Ozaukee County is in an area of nonattainment for pollutants such as ozone under National Ambient Air Quality Standards | spectrumnews1.com |
What happened
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Ozaukee County Distribution Interconnection Project filed with PSC [26]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Tom Uttech's property is 52 acres [25]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
American Transmission Co. application removed artist Tom Uttech's property from its proposed routes [25]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
A transmission line to power the Port Washington data center is no longer planned to run through artist Tom Uttech's property [25]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
American Transmission Company refiled a grid upgrade application on Monday, September 16, 2026 for infrastructure to serve the Port Washington data center. [24]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Microsoft has proposed a data center development in Kenosha [23]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Microsoft recently completed construction of the first of a series of data centers in Racine County in the village of Mount Pleasant [23]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Over 2,000 trees will be planted at the site and an 8 foot berm will be installed [23]
104 earlier entries
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Campus is expected to be operational beginning in and around 2028 [23]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Four data centers will be built at Lighthouse campus [23]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers, Oracle and OpenAI are building a $15 billion data center campus called Lighthouse in Port Washington on 672 acres next to Interstate 43 [23]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Campus is named Lighthouse [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
An 8 foot berm will be installed at the site [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Over 2,000 trees will be planted at the site [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Campus will use a closed loop cooling system for water [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
4,000 construction workers working on the project [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Campus expected to be operational beginning in and around 2028 [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Four data centers will be built at the campus [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Massive data center campus on 672 acres next to Interstate 43, around 30 minutes from Milwaukee [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Companies behind Project Lighthouse held an open house on September 10, 2026 [30]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Project Lighthouse is expected to open in 2028 [30]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Project Lighthouse is a four building data center campus [30]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
County Highway LL was fully closed for months for the water and sewer project before being resurfaced [21]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Fire hydrants were installed as part of a city infrastructure project to extend water and sewer service to the data center complex [21]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
New traffic signal installed at I-43 interchange near data center construction in Port Washington [20]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Crews are working on widened lanes for trucks and dedicated right turn lanes at the interchange [22]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
New temporary traffic signals were scheduled to go online Wednesday at the I-43 interchange [22]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Much of the traffic increase is attributed to data center construction traffic in the area [22]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Cloverleaf is reportedly looking to build a new hyperscale data center on the east side of Madison [1]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Cloverleaf Infrastructure was the original developer behind the Port Washington hyperscale data center before the project was transferred to Vantage [19]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Cloverleaf Infrastructure donated $100,000 to fund a sculpture at Coal Dock Park in Port Washington [19]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage is paying for traffic improvements and law enforcement officers for traffic control [28]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Project is expected to be completed in 2028 [28]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Data center campus broke ground in December 2025 [28]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Traffic lights were to be operational by August 24, 2026 [28]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Temporary traffic lights installed at highways 32 and H at I-43 interchange [28]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
American Transmission Co. hoped to begin construction in December and complete the buildout by the end of 2027. [34]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Aerial drone video shows growth of Port Washington AI campus under construction. [17]
-
· being built (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Construction continues on Vantage Data Centers' AI data center campus project in Port Washington, Wisconsin as of August 6, 2026 [14]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Public hearings planned for August 18 in Fredonia and August 19 in Kiel on this project are cancelled [49]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The project impacts parts of Ozaukee and Washington counties as well as Calumet, Fond du Lac and Sheboygan counties [49]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
ATC's project includes new power lines, rebuilding existing power lines, building up to five new substations, and maintenance on existing power lines for the Port Washington AI data center [49]
-
· stalled (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin revoked American Transmission Company's completeness determination for the Ozaukee County Distribution Interconnection Project on August 6, 2026 [49]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Total building area planned for the Port Washington campus is 2.5 million square feet. [53]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Number of data centers planned for the Port Washington campus is 4. [53]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Port Washington Lighthouse Data Center campus size is 672 acres. [53]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Building area of the Port Washington campus is 2.5 million square feet. [52]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Port Washington campus will have 4 data centers. [52]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Port Washington campus is 672 acres. [52]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage expects 1,000 employees on site at Port Washington when combined with its customers Oracle and OpenAI. [52]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Port Washington water utility installing two new water meters to track data center facility water usage [15]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Second building on campus recently topped out [31]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Port Washington facility called Lighthouse [31]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin released final environmental impact statement for Port Washington data center transmission lines [12]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
DNR determined it satisfied environmental obligations on December 9 for the Vantage project [11]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The DNR issued permits for the project on June 12 [42]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Topping out ceremony held June 26, 2026 for second of four data center buildings [33]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage topped out second building at Lighthouse campus in Port Washington on June 26, 2026 [7]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers is operating a massive Port Washington project [8]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The air permit is for 45 generators at the Vantage Lighthouse Campus [27]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage applied for and received preliminary approval to install up to 45 diesel generators [46]
-
· being built (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
$15 billion Port Washington data center project under construction [16]
-
· reported (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Construction on the site began in December after DNR permitting was completed [54]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Construction of roughly 670 acre campus slated to wrap up in 2028 [13]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage applying for permits to use 45 diesel fired generators for backup power [13]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage is building the data center to LEED standards with a goal of 41% biodiversity net gain [18]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The project is targeted for completion in 2028 [18]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage is contributing $3 million to the Valley Creek project intended to improve water quality and reduce downstream flooding [18]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage is laying 48.3 miles of water lines at the site with a closed loop system using less water than Port Washington public schools [18]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The buildings should be weather tight by the end of 2026 [18]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Buildings are being constructed sequentially with work on each structure starting 30 to 45 days after the last [18]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
About 1,000 workers are on site each day, with the workforce expected to swell to about 5,000 at peak construction [18]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The campus will have four data center buildings, two measuring about 1,800 by 400 feet (560,000 and 725,000 square feet respectively), about 27 feet tall [18]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus is a 675 acre data center project in Port Washington [18]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
New construction hour restrictions take effect April 18, 2026 [35]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Construction was previously allowed 24 hours a day during weekdays [35]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Rules do not go into effect until April 18 [47]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Construction on the Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus was originally limited to a 12 hour period but the city later approved 24 hour construction on weekdays. [32]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The data center campus in Port Washington has been under construction for over two months [50]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Motion hearing scheduled for February 13, 2026 [9]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus under construction in Port Washington [10]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers is planting over 2,000 native trees throughout the project site. [51]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers is preserving over 150 acres of land that will be restored to a native Wisconsin landscape. [51]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus groundbreaking held December 17, 2025 [45]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers building for Oracle and OpenAI [48]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Ceremonial groundbreaking held December 19, 2025 [48]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The project is part of OpenAI and Oracle's $500 billion Stargate AI data center initiative [43]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The project is expected to create 1,000 permanent jobs [43]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The project is expected to create more than 4,000 construction jobs [43]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The project is expected to be completed in 2028 [43]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The data center campus has 902 megawatts of capacity [43]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The data center campus includes four buildings totaling 2.5 million square feet [43]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The data center campus is 672 acres [43]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers broke ground on a $15 billion data center campus in Port Washington on December 18, 2025 [43]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
End users are OpenAI and Oracle [36]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Developer is Vantage Data Centers [36]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Groundbreaking held December 17, 2025, with construction beginning on 672 acre site [36]
-
· being built (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
TID would remain open for up to 20 years or until Vantage is reimbursed for all costs [37]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage said the data center campus will preserve 172 acres to support biodiversity and provide natural sound mitigation [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers is underwriting 100 percent of the power infrastructure investment with a dedicated electricity rate from WEC Energy Group utility We Energies [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The data center buildings will use a closed loop liquid cooling system [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The Port Washington Common Council approved the development agreement for the project in August [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
A $1.4 billion transmission line project from American Transmission Co. is proposed to support the Lighthouse campus [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The Lighthouse campus is roughly 670 acres [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers will have around 330 employees at the Lighthouse campus [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
OpenAI and Oracle will have around 700 jobs at the Lighthouse campus after construction [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The data center campus could create more than 4,000 construction jobs [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The four data center buildings are expected to need 1.3 gigawatts of electricity [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The Lighthouse campus includes four data center buildings [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The Lighthouse campus is part of OpenAI and Oracle's $500 billion Stargate program [44]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
The Port Washington data center campus is named Lighthouse [44]
-
· approved (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Vantage Data Centers, OpenAI, and Oracle plan to invest more than $15 billion at a Port Washington data center campus [44]
The full Vantage Port Washington Data Center timeline, in order
96 corrections to this record
Every correction, with its reason
-
· the summary of a record items row
the record's rules: the sentence copied its source, was about its headline or carried a number the card's facts do not; written again from the card's facts, on the editor's word The old and new text.
-
· the summary of a record items row
the record's rules: the sentence copied its source, was about its headline or carried a number the card's facts do not; written again from the card's facts, on the editor's word The old and new text.
-
· the summary of a record items row
the record's rules: the sentence copied its source, was about its headline or carried a number the card's facts do not; written again from the card's facts, on the editor's word The old and new text.
-
· the summary of a record items row
the record's rules: the sentence copied its source, was about its headline or carried a number the card's facts do not; written again from the card's facts, on the editor's word The old and new text.
-
· the summary of a record items row
the record's rules: the sentence copied its source, was about its headline or carried a number the card's facts do not; written again from the card's facts, on the editor's word The old and new text.
-
· the summary of a record items row
the record's rules: the sentence copied its source, was about its headline or carried a number the card's facts do not; written again from the card's facts, on the editor's word The old and new text.
-
· the speaker role of a statements row
Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Pastor Patti Plough, Responsible Energy Alliance": the title in front of the name (Pastor) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.
-
· the speaker of a statements row
Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Pastor Patti Plough, Responsible Energy Alliance": the title in front of the name (Pastor) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.
-
· the speaker role of a statements row
Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Mayor Ted Neitzke": the title in front of the name (Mayor) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.
-
· the speaker of a statements row
Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Mayor Ted Neitzke": the title in front of the name (Mayor) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.
-
· the speaker role of a statements row
Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Sheriff Christy Knowles": the title in front of the name (Sheriff) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.
-
· the speaker of a statements row
Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Sheriff Christy Knowles": the title in front of the name (Sheriff) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.
-
· the speaker role of a statements row
Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Sheriff Christy Knowles": the title in front of the name (Sheriff) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.
-
· the speaker of a statements row
Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Sheriff Christy Knowles": the title in front of the name (Sheriff) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a reference figures row
The record could not read this figure's source: no text of the page reached the classifier, which scored card 4304 from the headline alone, and the number came from the headline; published by the bulk approve of 2026-09-25. A reference figure needs a source the record read: returned to draft, off every page, until a readable source that states it is cited (docs/batch-unread-figures-0929.md). The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a reference figures row
The record could not read this figure's source: no text of the page reached the classifier, which scored card 4287 from the headline alone, and the number came from the headline; published by the bulk approve of 2026-09-25. A reference figure needs a source the record read: returned to draft, off every page, until a readable source that states it is cited (docs/batch-unread-figures-0929.md). The old and new text.
-
· the capacity mw of a projects row
The capacity read 130,013,500 MW. The source, a WPR article on the transmission line, said the data center is expected to need 1,300 megawatts in its first phase and up to 3,500 megawatts later, and the approval of 2026-09-25 ran the two numbers together. Returned to not disclosed, as it was before; which of the two figures the record carries is a person's decision. The old and new text.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: video is tier 5 (the editor, 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: video is tier 5 (the editor, 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: fox11online.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: fox11online.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: fox11online.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: fox11online.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: fox11online.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: fox11online.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: fox11online.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: tmj4.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: tmj4.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: ozaukeepress.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: tmj4.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: tmj4.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: tmj4.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: tmj4.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: ozaukeepress.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: dailyreporter.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: dailyreporter.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: dailyreporter.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: biztimes.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: biztimes.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: dailyreporter.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: dailyreporter.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: dailyreporter.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: dailyreporter.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: dailyreporter.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: biztimes.com is a news outlet (tiered by kind, the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier: the tier the record already gives wpr.org. The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wpr.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Project sweep: Vantage Port Washington Data Center, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wpr.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Project sweep: Vantage Port Washington Data Center, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wpr.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Project sweep: Vantage Port Washington Data Center, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wpr.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Project sweep: Vantage Port Washington Data Center, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wpr.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Project sweep: Vantage Port Washington Data Center, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wpr.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Project sweep: Vantage Port Washington Data Center, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wpr.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Project sweep: Vantage Port Washington Data Center, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wpr.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Project sweep: Vantage Port Washington Data Center, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the effective at of a status history row
Dated from its source: the video's own upload date (Feb 25, 2026, via DataForSEO youtube/video_info) The old and new text.
-
· the effective at of a status history row
Dated from its source: the video's own upload date (Apr 16, 2026, via DataForSEO youtube/video_info) The old and new text.
Every correction on the record is on the corrections page.
What was said
Summer Strand, PSC Chair, stated the decision was not opposition to data centers but rather that the application represented a cautionary tale of unrealistic speed to power expectations colliding with a deliberative regulatory process.
Brendan Conway, We Energies spokesperson, said the power line project is a critical part of delivering generation to the data center
Every statement about data centers in Wisconsin, by speaker
64 more statements on this page
Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty
The Uttechs did not plan to sell the property so it would have needed to be taken by eminent domain
Port Washington residents
Residents complained about construction mentioning noise and light pollution
Misty Allen, Vantage Data Centers vice president of public policy North America
The campus will use a closed loop cooling system for water
Energy utility MG&E filed a new data center tariff proposal with the Public Service Commission
City Engineer, Port Washington
City Engineer Roger Strohm said traffic at shift change is crazy
Pier Street Development developer
Haley Dobre, Pier Street Development, said job growth from the $15 billion data center complex north of downtown has increased demand for housing
PSC chair Summer Strand said ATC filed or refiled 564 application documents after receiving a completeness determination late last year.
Pastor, Responsible Energy Alliance
Pastor Patti Plough of Responsible Energy Alliance celebrated the PSC decision
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
ATC filed numerous substantial changes to its project application during the proceedings, which led to the revocation
PSC Chairperson Summer Strand described ATC application as clearly underwater and revoked completeness determination
Brendan Conway, We Energies spokesperson
No costs to serve data centers will be shifted to other customers
Brendan Conway, We Energies spokesperson
Data centers have to pay their full costs under the data center rate structure
Vantage North America President Dana Adams said the facility will support Oracle and their end user OpenAI running AI workloads out of the building.
Dana Adams, Vantage North America President
Tax revenue from the facility will begin flowing predominantly when construction is complete.
Dana Adams, Vantage North America president
Vantage will hire local residents including engineers, operators, technicians, network specialists, and security specialists.
Ryan Kehoe, Vantage VP of operations
The rooftop cooling system is relatively quiet by industry standards because much of the sound vectors upwards.
Dana Adams, Vantage North America president
Air containment isolates cold air or hot air so they do not mix, increasing efficiency and reducing cooling requirements.
Ryan Kehoe, Vantage VP of operations
The closed loop chilled water system requires only a one time fill of water.
Public Service Commission estimates Wisconsin will need 40 percent more peak demand power in coming years due to data center boom
MEA and Sierra Club filed a lawsuit after state regulators abandoned a required environmental review for the Port Washington data center
Vantage official (unnamed)
On Sept. 23, a Vantage official texted Port Washington Mayor Ted Neitzke about the governor's office seeking more information on why an EIS would kill the project
Michael Greif, Midwest Environmental Advocates attorney, said case is about transparency and accountability
Tricia Braun, executive director of the Wisconsin Data Center Coalition
Every direct data center job in Wisconsin supported more than six additional jobs elsewhere in the economy
Vantage Vice President of Construction
Victoria Tyson Bloyd, vice president of construction for Vantage, said disruptions from dust should be lessened soon
Michael Graham, Whiting Turner project lead, said there were 85 ironworkers at peak on that building
Wisconsin Public Service Commission commissioner
Wisconsin Public Service Commissioner Kristy Nieto said Wisconsin customers should not pay to subsidize data center service
Mark Freeman, Vantage Data Centers Vice President of Global Marketing
Vantage said backup generators are intended for emergencies and required testing and maintenance, running monthly with no more than four generators for 15 minutes, annually one at a time for an hour, and for 15 minutes to validate repairs
Ciaran Gallagher, Clean Wisconsin Energy and Air Manager
Clean Wisconsin found the data centers will add about $100,000 of health harms per year in Ozaukee County from backup diesel generators
Ben Donajkowski, Port Washington resident
Large dump trucks and construction equipment creating traffic congestion near data center
Ben Donajkowski, Port Washington resident
Traffic situation described as genuinely inexcusable
Christy Knowles, Sheriff
Vantage paying for traffic control and supplementing with flagmen
Christy Knowles, Sheriff
Traffic control expected to continue until at least October
Fredonia neighbor and Responsible Energy Alliance advocate
Patti Plough, Fredonia neighbor, leading opposition group against power lines routing through communities
Vantage Data Centers
Vantage said generators will primarily be used one or a few at a time during monthly testing, well below DNR's established limit of 50 hours per generator annually
Ted Neitzke, Mayor of Port Washington
The data center uses a closed loop cooling system that circulates water like a car radiator
Ted Neitzke, Mayor of Port Washington
Data centers do not discharge like manufacturing plants and do not require clean air credits or significant discharge permitting
Vice President of Global Marketing, Vantage Data Centers
Mark Freeman, Vice President of Global Marketing for Vantage Data Centers, said the company is committed to working with the city on construction alignment
Mayor of Port Washington
Port Washington Mayor Ted Neitzke said 24 hour construction was always going to be temporary
Mayor of Port Washington
Port Washington Mayor Ted Neitzke said the one month delay gives developer time to adjust worker schedules
Vantage Data Centers
Vantage stated they are committed to balancing schedule with community needs
Port Washington resident
Dean Wiegert, town resident, told Common Council 24 hour construction is hellish and backup alarms on trucks wake him throughout the night
Port Mayor Ted Neitzke said 24 hour exterior construction would end in about a month, ending exterior 24 hour work weeks earlier than Vantage anticipated end of May
Kim Tydrick, Port Washington resident
Residents cite bright work lights shining 24 hours, incessant backup beeping, traffic, emissions and dust
Port Washington Mayor Ted Neitzke said the new work hours are necessary to help get the project back on track after delays.
Edwin Van Velzen, Sr. Vice President for Construction, Vantage Data Centers
The data center buildings are being constructed concurrently
Dale Kooyenga, President, Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce
Business groups argue ordinance conflicts with state law delegating TID authority to municipal governing bodies
Emily Backus, Sustainability Director, North America
No water will be directly piped from Lake Michigan for the Lighthouse Campus.
Dana Adams, Vantage Data Centers North America President
Project is a cornerstone of Project Stargate, a $500 billion public private AI initiative
Sebastian Elischer, Great Lakes Neighbors United
Recall effort filed against Mayor Ted Neitzke over data center concerns
Mike Beaster, Great Lakes Neighbors United
The group is concerned about the data center's expected 1.3 gigawatt electricity draw and its effect on local utility rates
Mike Beaster, Great Lakes Neighbors United
The group is worried about how much water the $15 billion data center will use for cooling
Mike Beaster, Great Lakes Neighbors United
According to the recall group, the mayor has been secretive about the data center details and hasn't taken residents' concerns seriously
Mike Beaster
Great Lakes Neighbors United is working to recall Port Washington Mayor Ted Neitzke
Great Lakes Neighbors United
Opposition from residents has grown with protests and a recall effort announced against the mayor
Port Washington Mayor
Mayor Ted Neitzke said the project could create jobs, support local schools and help ensure future employment opportunities
Vantage Data Centers
Part of Stargate project, a $500 billion public private initiative
unnamed narrator
The Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus is being built using Wisconsin's clean renewable energy without increasing rates on residents.
Christine Le Jeune, Great Lakes Neighbors United, expressed concern that the TID was passed with little community input
Ted Neitzke IV, Port Washington Mayor
Mayor Ted Neitzke said Vantage is putting all capital up front for infrastructure, city pays them back from TID revenues
Todd Taves, Ehlers Public Finance Advisors, said the $175 million infrastructure cost estimate is conservative
Port Washington resident
Scott Lone, resident, said the council should vote against the TID creation and invest in people and local businesses instead
unnamed Vantage Data Centers representative
In 2019, Vantage made a company decision to no longer use evaporative cooling systems in its data center design.
unnamed Vantage Data Centers representative
The data center will not draw water directly from the lake, but will obtain water through existing Port Washington infrastructure.
The site
Where in Ozaukee County is not in the public record. The pin marks the county seat, not a building, and the outline is the county.
Tap a pin for the data center, the parcel for its record
- This record: Being built, ringed
- data center
- Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
- Smaller pins: 6 other published records in Wisconsin
Details
- this record's location, ringed
- parcel outline, from the county parcel record
- city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
- county boundary
The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.
- Where
- Port Washington, Ozaukee County, Wisconsin
- How exactly it is located
- County level, the county seat
- The parcel
- No parcel outline in the public record
- Nearest homes
- Not computed for a record placed at a place center
- Nearest records
- Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at a county seat.
Comparisons
6 metrics with more than one figure
Capacity at full buildout
7 figures, 6 sourcesMilwaukee Business News, Dec 17, 2025; Ozaukee Press, Dec 23, 2025; wpr.org, Jul 10, 2026
Show each source's words
- 5.4 GW, wpr.org: Environmental groups say data centers are driving construction of 5.4 gigawatts of new or updated gas fired power plants
- 3.5 GW, wpr.org: Roughly 670 acre campus could need up to 3.5 gigawatts of electricity
- 3.5 GW, wpr.org: The project could require up to 3.5 gigawatts of electricity in the future
- 3 GW, wpr.org: We Energies proposing to add almost 3 gigawatts of power to meet data center energy demand
- 2,000 MW, TMJ4 News: Vantage says it is paying for the buildout of 2,000 megawatts of energy
- 1,400 MW, TMJ4 News: The Port Washington facility will require 1,400 megawatts of power
- 1.3 GW, Milwaukee Business News: Expected power use is 1.3 gigawatts with later phases potentially up to 3.5 gigawatts
- 1.3 GW, Ozaukee Press: 1.3 gigawatts of power capacity for Lighthouse Campus
- 1.3 GW, wpr.org: The first phase of the project would use 1.3 gigawatts of energy, enough to power 640,000 homes
- 902 MW, Spectrum News: Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus in Port Washington will have four data centers totaling 902 megawatts of critical IT load
Project footprint
4 figures, 6 sourcesMilwaukee Business News, Dec 17, 2025; wpr.org, Jul 10, 2026; Ozaukee Press, Aug 19, 2026
Show each source's words
- 675 acres, Ozaukee Press: 675 acre site for Vantage Lighthouse Campus
- 675 acres, Ozaukee Press: Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus is 675 acres
- 672 acres, Milwaukee Business News: Project is 672 acres
- 672 acres, wpr.org: The data center campus spans 672 acres and includes four data centers
- 672 acres, Ozaukee Press: The 672 acre site will contain four data center buildings, warehouse, operations center and support buildings
- 670 acres, Milwaukee Business News: Vantage Port Washington project is $15 billion for a 670 acre site
- 4.7 acres, wpr.org: The project would result in filling 4.7 acres of wetlands
Construction jobs
1 figure, 2 sourcesShow each source's words
- 4,000 jobs, wpr.org: Vantage said campus could create more than 4,000 construction jobs
- 4,000 jobs, TMJ4 News: Vantage predicting 4,000 construction jobs
Permanent jobs
8 figures, 10 sourcesTMJ4 News, Jul 27, 2026; TMJ4 News, Jul 29, 2026; Wisconsin Public Radio, Sep 11, 2026; WLUK, Sep 11, 2026
Show each source's words
- 5,000 jobs, Ozaukee Press: Workforce expected to reach 5,000 going into winter
- 5,000 jobs, Ozaukee Press: Vantage Data Centers Lighthouse Campus workforce increased to approximately 5,000 workers in summer 2026
- 4,000 jobs, wpr.org: Data center campus could create more than 4,000 construction jobs and more than 1,000 permanent positions
- 4,000 jobs, Urban Milwaukee: 4,000 construction workers are working on the project and 1,000 permanent jobs will be at the campus once it is operational
- 1,700 workers, Ozaukee Press: Approximately 1,700 workers on site at time of ceremony
- 1,000 employees, TMJ4 News: Vantage expects 1,000 employees on site at Port Washington facility when combined with customers Oracle and OpenAI
- 1,000 employees, TMJ4 News: Vantage expects a combined 1,000 employees with its two biggest customers once the Port Washington facility opens.
- 1,000 employees, Wisconsin Public Radio: 1,000 permanent jobs will be at the campus once operational
- 1,000 employees, WLUK: Project Lighthouse is expected to provide 1,000 permanent jobs
- 700 jobs, wpr.org: OpenAI and Oracle will have around 700 jobs at campus, with Vantage having around 330 employees
- 300 jobs, Milwaukee Business News: Vantage plans to employ about 300 people at the data center, with tenant companies expected to employ an additional 700
- 200 workers, Milwaukee Business News: Expected to create thousands of construction jobs, with about 200 workers in 2025, 3,500 in 2026, 5,000 in 2027, and 2,000 in 2028
- 130 workers, TMJ4 News: Vantage currently employs about 130 workers at a campus location in Virginia.
Water a day
2 figures, 2 sourcesShow each source's words
- 11,000 gallons per day, Ozaukee Press: 11,000 gallons of water per day usage at Lighthouse Campus
- 10,000 gallons per day, Milwaukee Business News: Expected to use up to 10,000 gallons of water per day for cooling operations
Tax each year
4 figures, 3 sourcesShow each source's words
- 1,500,000,000 USD, thecentersquare.com: Data centers are beneficiary of estimated $1.5 billion in initial foregone state sales tax from four data center projects
- 458,000,000 USD, wpr.org: The TID provides property tax reimbursement and interest payments to the developer totaling more than $458 million over the next 18 years.
- 458,000,000 USD, TMJ4 News: Vantage will pay property taxes in Port Washington over the next 20 years through a Tax Incremental District to cover $458 million in infrastructure costs for the project.
- 65,000,000 USD, TMJ4 News: Vantage has paid $65 million in property taxes in Virginia since 2019.
- 30,000,000 USD, wpr.org: If the project delivers on the property value increases estimated in the city's project plan, Port Washington and other local taxing authorities would see an increase of more than $30 million annually in tax revenue from the project.
Questions about this project
7 questions answered from the record
How big is Vantage Port Washington Data Center?
-
The record has one measure of its size: 1 GW (not disclosed). Its acreage is not disclosed.
Who is building Vantage Port Washington Data Center?
-
Vantage is the developer. No construction contractor is named on the record yet.
Who will use Vantage Port Washington Data Center?
-
Not disclosed. No source on file names a tenant, says whether the site is single or multi tenant, or states what it is for. The record keeps the use as not disclosed until one does; see Who it serves.
How much power and water does Vantage Port Washington Data Center say it needs?
-
Power: 1 GW (not disclosed). Water: not disclosed by any source on file.
Where does Vantage Port Washington Data Center stand today?
-
It is being built, as reported August 6, 2026. The newest entry, reported September 18, 2026: Ozaukee County Distribution Interconnection Project filed with PSC [26].
What has Port Washington or Ozaukee County decided about it?
-
Ozaukee County: Enhanced pedestrian control signal and lane widening at Highland Lane and Highland Drive intersection (reported August 19, 2026, source); and Ozaukee County: County widening lanes at I-43 ramps and Highway LL, creating dedicated turn lanes (reported August 19, 2026, source). 3 events are on the county's rows; a rule about the area is not a decision about this record.
What is still unknown about Vantage Port Washington Data Center?
-
Not disclosed by any source on file: how much water it would use, how loud it would be, jobs once it runs, tax it would pay each year, who is constructing it, how much land, where its power comes from, grid connection, how it is cooled. No missing primary document is listed for this record yet; What the record lacks is where one appears when a person names it.
Sources
Primary documents
- Port Washington Data Center & Piping Plovers, civicmedia.us, August 25, 2026
- Vantage Data Centers: Data center locations, Vantage Data Centers, September 14, 2026
Reporting
- OpenAI, Oracle, and Vantage plan Stargate Wisconsin data center, expected to be 'close to a gigawatt' - Data Center Dynamics, Data Center Dynamics, October 23, 2025, query feed
- OpenAI, Oracle and Vantage Data Centers Announce Stargate Data Center Site in Wisconsin - Business Wire, Business Wire, October 22, 2025, query feed
- Port Washington data center developer nears $38B financing package - The Business Journals, The Business Journals, April 29, 2026, query feed
- Land purchased in Port Washington for massive data center campus - The Business Journals, The Business Journals, June 27, 2025, query feed
- Vantage tops out second building at OpenAI's Lighthouse campus in Wisconsin, Data Center Dynamics, June 26, 2026, trade press
- Go behind the scenes with an exclusive look at Vantage Data Centers massive Port Washington project, The Business Journals, June 15, 2026, local outlet
- Business groups sue to block Port Washington residents from interfering with TIDs, wpr.org, February 4, 2026, local outlet
- Drone view of the data center under construction in Port Washington, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, January 20, 2026, local outlet
- Sierra Club sues DNR over Port Washington data center project permitting - BizTimes, Milwaukee Business News, July 10, 2026, local outlet
- Final report out on environmental impacts of Port Washington data center transmission lines, Greater Milwaukee Today, July 23, 2026, local outlet
- Port Washington residents urge DNR to deny air quality permits for data center, wpr.org, April 15, 2026, local outlet
- New photos show growth of Port Washington AI campus, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, August 6, 2026, local outlet
40 more sources
- Residents demand transparency on Port Washington's $15B AI data center's water and environmental impact, TMJ4 News, July 28, 2026, local outlet
- Construction advances on $15B Port Washington data center, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, April 22, 2026, local outlet
- New drone video shows growth of Port Washington AI campus, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, August 6, 2026, local outlet
- A hyperscale construction project, Ozaukee Press, April 8, 2026, local outlet
- Port Washington neighbors react to new 'I ❤️ PW' sculpture funded by former data center developer, TMJ4 News, August 25, 2026, local outlet
- Port Washington residents say new traffic signal at I-43 interchange near data center construction is a welcome fix, Yahoo, August 31, 2026, local outlet
- Neighbors react to misplaced fire hydrant on County Highway LL in Port Washington, TMJ4 News, September 1, 2026, local outlet
- Port Washington residents say new traffic signals at the I-43 interchange construction are a welcome fix, TMJ4 News, August 31, 2026, local outlet
- At Port Washington Forum, Data Center Developers Face Skeptical Neighbors - Urban Milwaukee, Urban Milwaukee, September 11, 2026, local outlet
- ATC restarts push for grid upgrades serving Port Washington data center - VernonReporter, VernonReporter, September 16, 2026, local outlet
- Data center transmission line plan moved off artist's Saukville property - The Center Square, The Center Square, September 17, 2026, local outlet
- ATC reapplies to build a more than $2B transmission project serving Port Washington data center - WPR, WPR, September 18, 2026, local outlet
- Resident voices concern over potential pollution from new data center in Ozaukee County, Spectrum News, May 20, 2026, local outlet
- Port grapples with ‘crazy’ data center traffic, Ozaukee Press, August 19, 2026, local outlet
- ‘Community Conversation’ held on massive $15B data center campus in Port Washington, Wisconsin Public Radio, September 11, 2026, local outlet
- Companies behind Port Washington data centers meet with neighbors - WLUK, WLUK, September 11, 2026, local outlet
- Rare look inside Vantage data center amid debate over Wisconsin project, TMJ4 News, July 27, 2026, local outlet
- Frustration grows over 24 hour data center construction in Port Washington, wpr.org, March 13, 2026, local outlet
- Another data center tops out, Ozaukee Press, July 1, 2026, local outlet
- PSC deals major blow to transmission project supporting Port Washington data center, wpr.org, August 7, 2026, local outlet
- Port Washington limits construction hours for data center project after complaints, wpr.org, March 20, 2026, local outlet
- Groundbreaking held as construction begins on $15 billion Port Washington data center - BizTimes, Milwaukee Business News, December 17, 2025, local outlet
- Port Washington council approves TID for $15B data center campus as residents continue to speak out, wpr.org, November 5, 2025, local outlet
- Vantage data center energy costs: Who pays the bill in Port Washington, Wisconsin? - TMJ4 News, TMJ4 News, July 31, 2026, local outlet
- State regulators deliver massive setback to Port Washington data center power lines - WTMJ, WTMJ, August 7, 2026, local outlet
- Wisconsin regulators send ATC back to the drawing board on data center connection project - Wisconsin Watch, Wisconsin Watch, August 7, 2026, local outlet
- Port Washington's data center power line construction dealt a major blow - WISN, WISN, August 6, 2026, local outlet
- Groups sue Wisconsin DNR over environmental review of Port Washington data centers - WPR, WPR, July 10, 2026, local outlet
- $15 billion Vantage data center breaks ground in Port Washington, The Daily Reporter, December 18, 2025, local outlet
- Port Washington data center campus will be $15B hub for OpenAI, Oracle ‘Stargate’ program, wpr.org, October 24, 2025, local outlet
- Vantage marks start of $15B data center project, Ozaukee Press, December 23, 2025, local outlet
- Neighbors push back on diesel generators planned for Port Washington data center, TMJ4 News, May 5, 2026, local outlet
- 24 hour construction at the Port Washington data center is set to end; neighbors say new rules aren't enough, TMJ4 News, March 19, 2026, local outlet
- Controversial $15 billion data center breaks ground in Port Washington, TMJ4 News, December 19, 2025, local outlet
- Port Washington AI data center dealt massive blow, WLUK, August 6, 2026, local outlet
- TMJ4 gets exclusive look at construction of $15B Port Washington data center campus, YouTube, video
- Building the Port Washington Lighthouse Campus the Right Way, YouTube, January 9, 2026, video
- Rare look inside a Vantage data center, YouTube, July 28, 2026, video
- TMJ4 gets rare look inside a Vantage data center, YouTube, July 28, 2026, video
- Port Washington, Wisconsin Interview: Vantage Data Corporation with Mayor Ted Neitzke, YouTube, video
54 sources on file.
Cite this record
Data Center Record, "Vantage Port Washington Data Center", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/vantage-port-washington-data-center-wi, last verified September 25, 2026.
Cite this page
Data Center Record, "Vantage Port Washington Data Center", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/vantage-port-washington-data-center-wi. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.
The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.
For researchers
- Slug
- vantage-port-washington-data-center-wi
- Status value
- under_construction
- Stage
- Being built
- Tier
- skeleton
- Tags
- skeleton
- Place id
- us/wi/ozaukee-county/port-washington
- Coordinates
- 43.39333, -87.88111
- Location precision
- county
- Location source
- County seat (Port Washington), Wikidata, placed at county level
- Coordinate source
- wikidata county seat
- Location source number
- Not disclosed
- Location last verified
- September 16, 2026
- EPA registry id
- Not disclosed
- Use type values
- not_disclosed
- Tenancy value
- not_disclosed
- Cooling type value
- not_disclosed
- Capacity basis
- not_disclosed
- Water basis
- not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
- Acreage basis
- Not disclosed
- Interconnection value
- not_disclosed
- Capacity, if disclosed
- 1 GW, not disclosed
- Rating of the county's rows
- Not disclosed
- Published
- 2026-09-05
- Last verified
- 2026-09-25