How to read this page. Every count comes from the records on this page and links to where it is counted. Nothing is published until a person reads its source, and a figure no source gives reads Not disclosed; nothing is estimated. A rating changes only when a person sets it.
A blank cell means not disclosed by any source on file. Power is the developer's figure or a permit's, each linked on the record. All 13 Colorado projects.
Every Colorado record13 records, and 11 sites not yet verified listed apart · sort by any column · blank cell: not disclosed
Tier 1: an official or company source. Tier 2: a news report resolving to the outlet's own page. Located: a site coordinate from a permit, a parcel or an address, or the county or town centroid. Verified: the last day a person read the source. A blank cell means not disclosed by any source on file.
Every Colorado county (64)
6 of 64 counties have a record. A county without one is listed, not linked, until its first published record.
A blank rating cell means no person has set one for the county. A county without a record is listed, not linked.
55 counties with no records yet
Alamosa County
Archuleta County
Baca County
Bent County
Broomfield County
Chaffee County
Cheyenne County
Clear Creek County
Conejos County
Costilla County
Crowley County
Custer County
Delta County
Dolores County
Eagle County
Elbert County
Fremont County
Garfield County
Gilpin County
Grand County
Gunnison County
Hinsdale County
Huerfano County
Jackson County
Jefferson County
Kiowa County
Kit Carson County
La Plata County
Lake County
Las Animas County
Lincoln County
Logan County
Mineral County
Moffat County
Montezuma County
Montrose County
Morgan County
Otero County
Ouray County
Park County
Phillips County
Pitkin County
Prowers County
Pueblo County
Rio Blanco County
Rio Grande County
Routt County
Saguache County
San Juan County
San Miguel County
Sedgwick County
Summit County
Teller County
Washington County
Yuma County
The rules in Colorado12 rows · rating rests only on a binding act in force
What the state and its counties and cities have decided. Each row is rated by what it has decided, open, case by case, restrictive or closed, never by whether that is good or bad.
Two Colorado counties approved construction of large data centers.denvergazette.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Reported Sep 12 · 11 acts on this rowEvery act on the Colorado row
approval
Two Colorado counties approved construction of large data centers
Hayden Town Council voted 4-1 on August 6, 2026 to amend the town's municipal code to add language regulating data centers, making Hayden the first Routt County municipality to add data center language into its development code
Colorado Economic Development Commission approved up to $5,581,873 in performance based Job Growth Incentive Tax Credit over eight year period on January 16, 2025
Aurora City Council approved resolution directing city management to update data center development standards.coloradopolitics.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Aug 22, 2026 · 6 acts on this rowEvery act on the Aurora row
event
Aurora council voted unanimously to ban evaporative cooling systems for new data center developments.
Aurora City Council unanimously gave initial approval to a measure that would ban the use of evaporative cooling systems, targeting water intensive data centers
The Brighton City Council voted unanimously to adopt a one year moratorium on data center development.cpr.org (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Oct 6 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Brighton row
moratorium adopted
The Brighton City Council voted unanimously to adopt a one year moratorium on data center development
Data center on Garden of the Gods Road administratively approved by Colorado Springs.gazette.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Jun 12, 2026 · 17 acts on this rowEvery act on the Colorado Springs row
statement
Colorado Springs City Council adopted a proclamation aimed at reclaiming civility in politics following the Project Taurus hearing disruption.
Four people arrested at Project Taurus City Council meeting on September 17, 2026: Caleb Miller charged with second degree assault on peace officer after biting; Christianna Miller charged with obstructing a peace officer; Jacob Wilkinson charged with misdemeanor theft of body worn camera; Wendy Jerado charged with obstruction and megaphone disruption
Colorado Springs Planning Commission rejected resident appeals against proposed artificial intelligence data center off Garden of the Gods Road in a 6-2 vote on Thursday
Commerce City passes six month pause on accepting new data center applications.cbsnews.com (opens in a new tab)national outlet · Reported Sep 24 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Commerce City row
moratorium
Commerce City passes six month pause on accepting new data center applications
Denver approved one year moratorium on new data centers in May, scheduled to lift spring 2027.denverpost.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Sep 7, 2026 · 3 acts on this rowEvery act on the Denver row
statement
Denver mayor and three city council members announced the selection of 26 people to a working group on data center regulation on October 8, 2026
Tax rebate agreement provides 100% rebate for Douglas County's share of business personal property taxes over 35 years.denvergazette.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Aug 11, 2026 · 2 acts on this rowEvery act on the Douglas County row
Douglas County commissioners directed staff to explore cost of feasibility study on small modular nuclear reactors and microreactors to meet AI and data center power needs
Town of Lochbuie passed five year data center moratorium.datacenterdynamics.com (opens in a new tab)trade press · Reported Aug 6 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Lochbuie row
moratorium adopted
Town of Lochbuie passed five year data center moratorium
Additional study sessions proposed for October 27 and December 8, 2026.coloradobiz.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Reported Aug 28 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Loveland row
hearing
Additional study sessions proposed for October 27 and December 8, 2026
Mesa County implemented a similar moratorium Sept. 29 with a resolution.gjsentinel.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Sep 29 · 2 acts on this rowEvery act on the Mesa County row
moratorium adopted
Mesa County implemented a similar moratorium Sept. 29 with a resolution.
Weld County adopted a regulatory framework in April requiring evidence of water availability and electricity provider commitment, imposing noise limits and prohibiting data centers on agricultural land.theminermag.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · Sep 10, 2026 · 8 acts on this rowEvery act on the Weld County row
litigation
Colorado landowners sued Weld County and a data center developer, alleging that the county unlawfully approved the first phase of what they say will be the state's largest data center despite concerns about its water and electricity needs, noise pollution and violations of public meeting requirements. (alleged in the filing, not a finding)
Ordinance required proof of electricity and water service, implemented tighter noise regulations, and prohibited data center construction in agricultural zones
Weld County adopted a regulatory framework in April requiring evidence of water availability and electricity provider commitment, imposing noise limits and prohibiting data centers on agricultural land
Reported: the source's date; the item names no day of its own. A month with no day: the source names the month and not the day. A rating rests only on a binding act in force; "not rated" means no person has set one. A blank cell means the record holds nothing for it.
5 bills tracked in the Colorado legislature, 2 of them signed into law, grouped by where each stands. A row opens its own page; the Colorado laws page has what each law requires.
Concerning the expansion of electric transmission facilities to enable Colorado to meet its clean energy goals, and, in connection therewith, creating the Colorado electric transmission authority, requiring transmission utilities to join organized wholesale markets, and allowing additional classes of transmission utilities to obtain revenue through the colocation of broadband facilities within their existing rights of way. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Concerning the apportionment of income for state income tax for taxpayers with enterprise data centers in the state. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Concerning benefits to facilitate data center development while supporting electric grid infrastructure, and, in connection therewith, creating the "Colorado Data Center Development and Grid Modernization Act". As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Concerning facilitation of data center development while supporting utility resources, and, in connection therewith, creating the "Colorado Data Center Workforce, Clean Energy, Grid Modernization, and Consumer and Environmental Protection Act". As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Apportionment Of Income Of Enterprise Data Centers
5 bills tracked in Colorado; 2026 Regular Session, legislature adjourned; last checked October 26, 2026. The last check found: 2 bills matched the watch terms as of October 26, 2026. Search terms: data center, data centre, large load, hyperscale, computing facility, server farm, high load factor (indirect), energy intensive facility (indirect), large electric load (indirect), digital asset mining (indirect), cryptocurrency mining (indirect), qualified technology facility (indirect), colocation (indirect), moratorium (with another term), sales tax exemption (with another term). The search on LegiScan. (opens in a new tab)
H.R. 9340, Ratepayer Protection Act: U.S. House of Representatives, roll call 312, September 16, 2026. On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended. Passed, 417 to 3. Colorado's members: 8 yea, 0 nay. How each member voted
Member
Party
Position
Boebert
R
Yea
Crank
R
Yea
Crow
D
Yea
DeGette
D
Yea
Evans (CO)
R
Yea
Hurd (CO)
R
Yea
Neguse
D
Yea
Pettersen
D
Yea
A blank party cell means the clerk's roll gives none.
H.R. 9340, Ratepayer Protection Act: U.S. Senate, roll call 254, September 30, 2026. On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed H.R. 9340. Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected, 57 to 43. Colorado's members: 0 yea, 2 nay. How each member voted
Member
Party
Position
Bennet (D-CO)
D
Nay
Hickenlooper (D-CO)
D
Nay
A blank party cell means the clerk's roll gives none.
Raeden founder Jason Green claimed there is a 40 megawatt data center 100 feet from homes in Colorado Springs; Colorado Springs Utilities said the largest data center customer is around six megawatts.
Sound and noise ordinances were major concerns at the hearing, with residents and councilors noting that dBA measurements filter out lower pitch noises.
Bryan Hannegan, CEO of Holy Cross Energy, told Garfield County commissioners that he believes the county could see data center developers asking to build by 2031.
Roland Rainey proposed the delay to allow the city to address remaining questions including negotiations with Colorado Springs Utilities for a large load tariff contract
Eric Eriksen, head of the San Luis Valley Rural Electric Cooperative, said the Strata container based data center would help stabilize rates for its customers since the rural electric cooperative has excess capacity as farmers reduce their operations
Canon proposes five conditions: complete cost causation, public contracts, closed loop cooling with hard caps, newcomers must bring generation, and strategic siting near airports
The town received inquiries in 2026 from Pure Green Colorado and Toto Labs Inc, site selectors who expressed interest in developing data centers in the area
CEO Igor Stamenkovic said the larger facility will increase the company's ability to manufacture and test complete power systems domestically while creating additional jobs
Mayor Yemi Mobolade announced six standards for data centers in Colorado Springs: protecting ratepayers, protecting water, protecting neighborhoods, protecting community standards, welcoming community contribution, and protecting the public's voice.
Former Colorado Springs Mayor John Suthers said data centers like Project Taurus are a critical tool the city must have to remain relevant as a national military and business hub
On federal matters, filed on the federal page; not counted among Colorado's statements.
Gabe Evans, U.S. Representative (R-Colo.): Rep. Gabe Evans (R Colo.) introduced legislation requiring state public utility commissions to consider federal guardrails for data center and AI center construction and operation. (September 17, 2026)
Gabe Evans, Representative, Colorado Republican: Gabe Evans, Colorado Republican, sponsors the Ratepayer Protection Act (September 16, 2026)
Already running in Colorado
8 sites are serving load, 3 of them in Denver County.
Which counties and cities in Colorado have rules about data centers?
11 county and city rows are on the record, 5 of them rated: Aurora is rated case by case: Aurora City Council approved resolution directing city management to update data center development standards, August 22, 2026, source (opens in a new tab), Colorado Springs is rated case by case: Data center on Garden of the Gods Road administratively approved by Colorado Springs, June 12, 2026, source (opens in a new tab) and Denver is rated restrictive: Denver approved one year moratorium on new data centers in May, scheduled to lift spring 2027, September 7, 2026, source (opens in a new tab). Every row and its dated events are on the scorecard. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers
answered from the rows above
What is proposed or being built near me in Colorado, by county?
A blank cell means no record in Colorado disclosed the figure. Third party figures on the same metrics are listed apart below; a figure a project disclosed about itself is never mixed with them.
Figure
Disclosed total
Disclosed
Without a figure
Basis
Power
50 MW
1
12
1 third party estimate
Water, stated per day
0
13
Water, stated per year
0
13
Permanent jobs
0
13
Tax each year
0
13
A blank total means no record disclosed the figure; the count without one says how many.
Summed only where a record disclosed the figure; a record with no figure adds nothing and is counted as not disclosed. Water is summed per day and per year separately, as the sources stated it, and never converted. A tax claim given as a range is summed at both ends.
The disclosed totals are in the table above.
No source on file states what any of the 13 tracked facilities in Colorado are for. 11 sites not yet verified are named apart and are not in that number.
What each use disclosed
Use
Records
Power
Water
Jobs
Tax each year
No stated use
13
50 MW
A blank cell means no record with that use disclosed the figure.
A record that lists several uses counts once under each. Each cell is the sum over the records with that use, disclosed rows only.
No source on file states how any of the 13 tracked facilities in Colorado are cooled. 11 sites not yet verified are named apart and are not in that number.
Sources read for Colorado
19 sources
19 sources are read for Colorado:
Newspapers
The Gazette
Public broadcaster
Colorado Public Radio
Utility commission dockets
Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Search feeds
16 news searches
Every feed, with its kind and tier
What the monitor reads for Colorado: feeds every four hours, pages daily.
FiguresOnly what a source states, with its basis. Nothing is estimated, and a figure no source gives reads not disclosed.
LicenseData CC BY-NC 4.0 (opens in a new tab); free for personal, academic, civic and newsroom reporting with attribution. Commercial, enterprise, financial or AI training use needs a commercial license. Prose stays under copyright.
Cite this pageData Center Record, "Data centers in Colorado", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/co, updated October 20, 2026.CSV · JSON · GeoJSON
Data Center Record, "Data center records in Colorado", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/co. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY-NC 4.0.
The structured rows are CC BY-NC 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.
reported 3, approved 2, running 8, not yet verified 11
Located records
3 located, 10 at a centroid, 0 without coordinates
Researcher view · Colorado · 13 data center sites, 0 buildings where disclosed, 12 rule rows, 5 bills · basis and source tier on every row · verified October 20, 2026