South Carolina decides case by case. From the state's own rule: A one year water reporting requirement for data centers passed in the South Carolina state budget, September 5, 2026.
3 sites the EPA's registry shows and no record has verified are on the map apart from the count. What not yet verified means.
How to read this page. Every count comes from the records on this page and links to where it is counted. Nothing is published until a person reads its source, and a figure no source gives reads Not disclosed; nothing is estimated. A rating changes only when a person sets it.
A blank cell means not disclosed by any source on file. Power is the developer's figure or a permit's, each linked on the record. All 7 South Carolina projects.
Every South Carolina record7 records, and 3 sites not yet verified listed apart · sort by any column · blank cell: not disclosed
Tier 1: an official or company source. Tier 2: a news report resolving to the outlet's own page. Located: a site coordinate from a permit, a parcel or an address, or the county or town centroid. Verified: the last day a person read the source. A blank cell means not disclosed by any source on file.
Every South Carolina county (46)
6 of 46 counties have a record. A county without one is listed, not linked, until its first published record.
A blank rating cell means no person has set one for the county. A county without a record is listed, not linked.
30 counties with no records yet
Abbeville County
Allendale County
Bamberg County
Barnwell County
Calhoun County
Cherokee County
Chester County
Chesterfield County
Clarendon County
Darlington County
Dillon County
Edgefield County
Florence County
Georgetown County
Greenville County
Hampton County
Horry County
Lancaster County
Lee County
Lexington County
Marlboro County
McCormick County
Oconee County
Orangeburg County
Pickens County
Richland County
Saluda County
Sumter County
Union County
Williamsburg County
The rules in South Carolina13 rows · rating rests only on a binding act in force
What the state and its counties and cities have decided. Each row is rated by what it has decided, open, case by case, restrictive or closed, never by whether that is good or bad.
A one year water reporting requirement for data centers passed in the South Carolina state budget.yahoo.com (opens in a new tab)national outlet · Sep 5, 2026 · 8 acts on this rowEvery act on the South Carolina row
approval
South Carolina Department of Environmental Services approved permit for data center to build and operate 11 combustion turbines
Anderson County Council passed a six month moratorium on data centers.foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Aug 20, 2026 · 2 acts on this rowEvery act on the Anderson County row
moratorium adopted
Anderson County approved a six month data center moratorium
Beaufort County council members proposed a freeze on data centers citing concerns about water, electricity and land use.yahoo.com (opens in a new tab)national outlet · Reported Sep 12 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Beaufort County row
moratorium
Beaufort County council members proposed a freeze on data centers citing concerns about water, electricity and land use
The council passed a six month moratorium on data centers back in July.live5news.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Sep 14, 2026 · 6 acts on this rowEvery act on the Colleton County row
litigation
Miles Crosby and another resident sued to block a proposed 859 acre data center campus in Colleton County South Carolina
Colleton County Council unanimously approved Digital Infrastructure Overlay ordinance on September 14, 2026, allowing data centers in designated zones after having a moratorium.
County Council voted unanimously to approve a controversial zoning change that opens the door to data centers across much of the county's rural land, through a new Digital Infrastructure Overlay District.
Colleton County Planning Commission and Council approved first reading on August 10, 2026 of ordinance for digital infrastructure overlay related to data centers
The council passed a six month moratorium on data centers back in July. But that moratorium is now partially repealed and no longer applies west of Interstate 95, or in areas already zoned industrial with this overlay.
Ordinance setting Fairfield County moratorium passed its second of three readings with public hearing set for Aug. 31 and final reading scheduled for Sept. 14.aol.com (opens in a new tab)national outlet · Aug 17 · 2 acts on this rowEvery act on the Fairfield County row
moratorium adopted
Ordinance setting Fairfield County moratorium passed its second of three readings with public hearing set for Aug. 31 and final reading scheduled for Sept. 14
Greenwood County approved a one year data center moratorium.wyff4.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Reported Sep 23 · 2 acts on this rowEvery act on the Greenwood County row
moratorium adopted
Greenwood County approved a one year data center moratorium
Kershaw County Council voted unanimously to pass the final reading of the data center moratorium ordinance on Tuesday night.southcarolinapublicradio.org (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Sep 22, 2026 · 2 acts on this rowEvery act on the Kershaw County row
moratorium adopted
Kershaw County enacted a one year moratorium on data center development
Laurens County Council unanimously adopts Ordinance 1012 imposing 12 month moratorium on new data center applications and permits.golaurens.com (opens in a new tab)news outlet · Sep 16, 2026 · 4 acts on this rowEvery act on the Laurens County row
moratorium adopted
Laurens County approved a one year data center moratorium
The project was approved by Marion County Council in January with tax breaks.datacenterdynamics.com (opens in a new tab)trade press · January 2026 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Marion County row
approval
The project was approved by Marion County Council in January with tax breaks
Mount Pleasant planning committee recommended a 120 day moratorium on data center development.yahoo.com (opens in a new tab)national outlet · Reported Aug 31 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Mount Pleasant row
moratorium
Mount Pleasant planning committee recommended a 120 day moratorium on data center development
Newberry County approved a one year data center moratorium.wyff4.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Reported Sep 23 · 1 act on this rowEvery act on the Newberry County row
moratorium adopted
Newberry County approved a one year data center moratorium
Spartanburg County Council voted 5-1 to approve a one year freeze on new data centers larger than 65 megawatts.foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab)local outlet · Sep 22, 2026 · 18 acts on this rowEvery act on the Spartanburg County row
moratorium adopted
Spartanburg County Council approved a temporary one year moratorium for nearly all data center developments
Data centers of 65 megawatts or less can still build in Spartanburg County over the next year if located in established industrial parks or on former industrial sites, and cannot generate their own electricity except for emergency backup
Spartanburg County Council held special meeting on Monday to discuss data center projects and vote on countywide moratorium on new data center projects
Residents filed lawsuit asking court to declare Spartanburg County comply with its own land development ordinance and require Valara Holdings to obtain major land development permit.
Spartanburg County Council held a lengthy and heated discussion about a proposed data center on September 9, 2026, with residents voicing concerns about public safety impacts.
County Council moved through first two readings of proposed 12 month data center moratorium; moratorium currently in effect under pending ordinance doctrine; final vote expected later this month
County planning and development staff denied proposed data center on Jones Road citing Unified Land Management Ordinance violations and noting inability to accept second application due to moratorium under consideration
Southern Environmental Law Center filed lawsuit July 6, 2026 on behalf of concerned citizens group challenging Spartanburg County land development classification
Reported: the source's date; the item names no day of its own. A month with no day: the source names the month and not the day. A rating rests only on a binding act in force; "not rated" means no person has set one. A blank cell means the record holds nothing for it.
10 bills tracked in the South Carolina legislature, 1 of them signed into law, grouped by where each stands. A row opens its own page; the South Carolina laws page has what each law requires.
Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws By Adding Article 31 To Chapter 9, Title 58 So As To Permit Certain Items Sold To Or Used By Internet Access Service Providers And Communications Service Providers To Be Exempt From Sales Tax, To Establish A Process For Refunds On Taxes Paid On Exempt Items, And To Prohibit Data Centers From Claiming Or Utilizing These Exemptions Or Refunds. - Ratified Title As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Prohibit Governmental Entities Of This State, Counties, Municipalities, Or Political Subdivisions From Accepting Or Taking Any Action On Permits Or Applications For Data Centers Until The General Assembly Establishes A Comprehensive Oversight And Approval Process For New Data Centers In This State, And To Define "data Center." As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws By Enacting The "energy Affordability Act" By Amending Section 58-37-20, Relating To The Public Service Commission, So As To Provide For Demand side Pilot Programs; By Amending Section 58-37-120, Relating To Applications For Permit, So As To Require A Public Comment Period For Any Application For A Permit For An Energy Infrastructure Project, And To Require Notice To Affected Landowners If A Public Utility That Plans To Construct, Or Has Entered Into Agreements To Construct, An Energy Infrastructure Project That May Result In The Use Of Eminent Domain And To Prescribe The Methods And Content Of The Notice, And To Require The Office Of Regulatory Staff To Provide The Property Owner A Summary Of Owner Rights Under State Eminent Domain Law If The Property Owner Contacts The Office Of Regulatory Staff After Receiving Notice; By Adding Section 58-27-835 So As To Provide For The Terms And Conditions Of Electric Service To Commercial Data Centers; By Adding Section 58-27-836 So As To Provide For Reports To The Department Of Environmental Services Concerning Surface And Ground Water Used By Commercial Data Centers; By Adding Section 58-27-837 So As To Require Commercial Data Centers To File Decommissioning Plans And Decommissioning Financial Assurance Instruments With The Department Of Environmental Services; By Amending Section 12-36-2120, Relating To Exemptions From Sales Tax, So As To Provide That The Computer Equipment Exemption Is Available To A Taxpayer That Entered Into A Fee in lieu Agreement On Or Before May 30, 2026; To Provide That The Exemption For Electricity Used By A Technology Intensive Facility Is Not Available To A Taxpayer That Did Not Claim The Credit Prior To May 30, 2026; To Provide That To Claim The Exemption For Original Or Replacement Computers, Computer Equipment, And Computer Hardware And Software Purchases Used In A Datacenter, The Taxpayer Must Have Notified The Departments Of Revenue And Commerce Of Its Intention To Claim The Credit On Or Before May 30, 2026; And To Provide That The Exemption For Original Or Replacement Computers, Computer Equipment, And Computer Hardware And Software Purchases Used In A Datacenter The Taxpayer Must Have Been Certified By The Department Of Commerce Prior To May 30, 2030; And By Amending Section 58-27-840, Relating To Prohibitions On Preferences And Unreasonable Rates, So As To Require Electrical Utilities To Offer Discounted Rates To Low Income Households, Subject To The Commission's Approval. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Prohibit Governmental Entities Of This State, Counties, Municipalities, Or Political Subdivisions From Granting Final Approval For Applications Or Permits For, Or Incentives Or Other Requests Related To, New Data Centers Until January 1, 2028, And To Define "data Center." As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws So As To Enact The "south Carolina Ratepayer Protection And Large Load Customer Infrastructure Accountability Act" By Adding Chapter 44 To Title 58 So As To Provide Definitions, Prohibit Incremental Costs Resulting From Large Load Customers To Be Recovered From Customers In Another Customer Class; To Establish Contract Requirements Between Large Load Customers And Electrical Utilities; To Establish Review Standards For The Public Service Commission; And To Require Annual Reports From Large Load Customers; By Adding Section 13-1-80 So As To Establish Requirements Regarding Incentives That May Be Offered To Potential Large Load Customers; By Adding Section 6-29-550 So As To Establish Requirements Regarding Public Notice, Public Hearings, And Local Governmental Certifications Concerning Planning And Zoning Prior To The Receipt Of Certain Permits Or Incentives; And By Adding Section 49-1-100 So As To Require Potential Large Load Customers To Provide Plans Regarding Water Resources And Annual Reporting Requirements To The Department Of Environmental Services, And To Require The Department Of Environmental Services To Verify Water Usage Contingency Plan Adherence In The Event Of A Drought. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws So As To Enact The "data Center Siting Act"; By Adding Section 58-44-10 So As To Define Terms Pertaining To Data Center Siting; By Adding Section 58-44-20 So As To Require A Certificate Issued By The Public Service Commission Before A Data Center May Begin Operations In South Carolina And To Provide For The Application Process; By Adding Section 58-44-30 So As To Provide For The Certification Proceeding Process; By Adding Section 58-44-40 So As To Provide For The Parties To A Certification Proceeding; By Adding Section 58-44-50 So As To Provide For The Evaluative Criteria For Consideration Of An Application; By Adding Section 58-44-60 So As To Provide For The Creation Of A Record Of Any Hearing And Testimony Taken Certification Proceeding; By Adding Section 58-44-70 So As To Provide For The Requirements For Granting Or Denying An Application; By Adding Section 58-44-80 So As To Provide For The Issuance Of An Order By The Commission; By Adding Section 58-44-90 So As To Provide For Operational Efficiency Standards; By Adding Section 58-44-100 So As To Provide For Water Efficiency Standards; By Adding Section 58-44-110 So As To Provide For Annual Reporting On Compliance With Water Efficiency Standards And Operational Efficiency Standards; By Adding Section 58-44-120 So As To Provide For Infrastructure Adequacy Assessments, To Provide For Environmental Impact Assessments, And To Provide For Reasonable Buffer Requirements; By Adding Section 58-44-130 So As To Provide For The Public Service Commission's Role Concerning Rates, Agreements Between Utilities And Data Centers, And Cost Allocation Methodologies; By Adding Section 58-44-140 So As To Provide For Decommissioning Plans And Financial Assurances Associated With Decommissioning; By Adding Section 58-44-150 So As To Provide For The Interaction Between The Provisions Of This Chapter And Local Governments And Local Government Land Use Planning; By Adding Section 58-44-160 So As To Require Data Centers To Implement Reasonable Measures To Minimize Noise, Vibration, And Light Impacts Resulting From Their Operation; By Adding Section 58-44-170 So As To Provide Protections For Confidential Information Shared By Data Center Operators; By Adding Section 58-44-180 So As To Clarify The Interaction Between This Chapter And Other Environmental Laws; By Adding Section 58-44-190 So As To Provide For Enforcement And Penalties; To Provide For Regulations From The Public Service Commission, The Office Of Regulatory Staff, And The Department Of Environmental Services; Provide That For Two Years After Enactment The Department Of Environmental Services Shall Prioritize Technical Assistance And Guidance Over Enforcement To Facilitate Industry Transition To The New Requirements; Authorize The Public Service Commission To Create A Generic Docket By The Public Service Commission To Implement This Act And Develop Regulations; And Provide For Annual Reporting By The Public Service Commission. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.
10 bills tracked in South Carolina; 126th General Assembly, legislature in session; last checked October 26, 2026. The last check found no bill not already tracked; the 10 tracked bills stand. Search terms: data center, data centre, large load, hyperscale, computing facility, server farm, high load factor (indirect), energy intensive facility (indirect), large electric load (indirect), digital asset mining (indirect), cryptocurrency mining (indirect), qualified technology facility (indirect), colocation (indirect), moratorium (with another term), sales tax exemption (with another term). The search on LegiScan. (opens in a new tab)
H.R. 9340, Ratepayer Protection Act: U.S. House of Representatives, roll call 312, September 16, 2026. On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended. Passed, 417 to 3. South Carolina's members: 7 yea, 0 nay. How each member voted
Member
Party
Position
Biggs (SC)
R
Yea
Clyburn
D
Yea
Fry
R
Yea
Mace
R
Yea
Norman
R
Yea
Timmons
R
Yea
Wilson (SC)
R
Yea
A blank party cell means the clerk's roll gives none.
H.R. 9340, Ratepayer Protection Act: U.S. Senate, roll call 254, September 30, 2026. On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed H.R. 9340. Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected, 57 to 43. South Carolina's members: 2 yea, 0 nay. How each member voted
Member
Party
Position
Graham (R-SC)
R
Yea
Scott (R-SC)
R
Yea
A blank party cell means the clerk's roll gives none.
42 more on this page, one per speaker and claim; 54 statements in all
Libertarian candidate Kasie Whitener believes local communities should decide for themselves what to do about data centers without government permission
Darline Graham, Republican senator, said she is concerned about data centers and thinks there needs to be community involvement when it comes to data centers
Darline Graham, Republican U.S. Senator, said a two year moratorium on data centers would be dangerous to national security because China would get ahead.
Jermaine Johnson, Democratic gubernatorial candidate, supports a statewide moratorium on data centers until comprehensive approval and oversight processes are in place.
Annie Andrews, Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, accuses incumbent Darline Graham of supporting $70 billion in federal tax breaks for data centers.
Jessica Coker, Spartanburg County councilwoman, voted against the moratorium, saying no evidence had been presented demonstrating a clear threat to residents
Dr. Octavia Amaechi, Spartanburg County Commissioner of Public Works, expressed concern about the magnitude of the change in water demand projections and questions about how the projections changed and long term water use implications.
Jermaine Johnson, Democratic nominee for governor, introduced a resolution in the General Assembly calling for a moratorium on data center construction until the Legislature passes an oversight and approval process.
Alan Wilson, Republican nominee for governor, said local communities should have the right to determine if they want data centers in their areas and that operators should be incentivized to lessen environmental impact.
State Rep. Thomas Beach said bill by Rep. April Cromer and co sponsored by Rep. Lee Hewitt would require data centers to pay for infrastructure including electricity and water.
Parallel bills exist in the House and Senate to enable state utility commissions to address cost allocation for data center power generation, transmission, and distribution
Matthew Brownlee says the time will be used to hear from residents, planners and industry experts and to look at issues like water use, electricity and environmental impacts
Southern Environmental Law Center advocated for a pause on data centers and raised concerns about a data center currently under construction on South Pine Street
A blank cell means no record in South Carolina disclosed the figure. Third party figures on the same metrics are listed apart below; a figure a project disclosed about itself is never mixed with them.
Figure
Disclosed total
Disclosed
Without a figure
Basis
Power
450 MW
1
6
1 third party estimate
Water, stated per day
0
7
Water, stated per year
0
7
Permanent jobs
0
7
Tax each year
0
7
A blank total means no record disclosed the figure; the count without one says how many.
Summed only where a record disclosed the figure; a record with no figure adds nothing and is counted as not disclosed. Water is summed per day and per year separately, as the sources stated it, and never converted. A tax claim given as a range is summed at both ends.
The disclosed totals are in the table above.
No source on file states what any of the 7 tracked facilities in South Carolina are for. 3 sites not yet verified are named apart and are not in that number.
What each use disclosed
Use
Records
Power
Water
Jobs
Tax each year
No stated use
7
450 MW
A blank cell means no record with that use disclosed the figure.
A record that lists several uses counts once under each. Each cell is the sum over the records with that use, disclosed rows only.
No source on file states how any of the 7 tracked facilities in South Carolina are cooled. 3 sites not yet verified are named apart and are not in that number.
Sources read for South Carolina
12 sources
12 sources are read for South Carolina:
Newspapers
The Post and Courier
Public broadcaster
South Carolina Public Radio
Economic development
South Carolina Department of Commerce
Search feeds
9 news searches
Every feed, with its kind and tier
What the monitor reads for South Carolina: feeds every four hours, pages daily.
FiguresOnly what a source states, with its basis. Nothing is estimated, and a figure no source gives reads not disclosed.
LicenseData CC BY-NC 4.0 (opens in a new tab); free for personal, academic, civic and newsroom reporting with attribution. Commercial, enterprise, financial or AI training use needs a commercial license. Prose stays under copyright.
Cite this pageData Center Record, "Data centers in South Carolina", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/sc, updated October 19, 2026.CSV · JSON · GeoJSON
Data Center Record, "Data center records in South Carolina", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/sc. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY-NC 4.0.
The structured rows are CC BY-NC 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.
reported 3, being built 2, running 2, not yet verified 3
Located records
0 located, 7 at a centroid, 0 without coordinates
Researcher view · South Carolina · 7 data center sites, 0 buildings where disclosed, 13 rule rows, 10 bills · basis and source tier on every row · verified October 19, 2026