Data Center Record.

Data centers in South Carolina

South Carolina has 7 data center sites, 0 buildings where disclosed on the record: 2 running, 2 being built and 3 proposed. The counties with the most are Aiken County (2) and Beaufort County (1), and records are in 6 of 46 counties. The largest proposal is NorthMark Spartanburg County Data Center in Spartanburg County, 450 MW (third party estimate); it is reported, as reported August 25, 2026.

South Carolina decides case by case. From the state's own rule: A one year water reporting requirement for data centers passed in the South Carolina state budget, September 5, 2026.

3 sites the EPA's registry shows and no record has verified are on the map apart from the count. What not yet verified means.

How to read this page. Every count comes from the records on this page and links to where it is counted. Nothing is published until a person reads its source, and a figure no source gives reads Not disclosed; nothing is estimated. A rating changes only when a person sets it.

Projects and campuses on the record

A blank cell means not disclosed by any source on file. Power is the developer's figure or a permit's, each linked on the record. All 7 South Carolina projects.

Every South Carolina record 7 records, and 3 sites not yet verified listed apart · sort by any column · blank cell: not disclosed

RecordPlaceStageOperatorMWBasisLocatedTierVerified
Aiken 5 MW Data CenterEdgefieldNot yet verifiedEPA registry22026-10-20
Sce&g Irmo Data CenterWilliamsburgNot yet verifiedEPA registry22026-10-20
Iws Anderson Data Center Project Phase 2Anderson, AndersonNot yet verifiedEPA registry22026-10-03
NorthMark Spartanburg County Data CenterSpartanburgProposedNorthMark450third party estimatecentroid42026-10-06
Amentum / DC Blox Savannah River AI Data CenterAikenProposedAmentum / DC Bloxcentroid32026-09-17
Hilton Head Area Data CentersBeaufortProposedcentroid42026-09-17
Meta Aiken Data CenterAiken, AikenRunningMetacentroid22026-09-17
Google Dorchester County data centerDorchesterBeing builtGooglecentroid12026-09-17
QTS York CountyYorkBeing builtQTS Data Centerscentroid22026-09-17
Google Berkeley County data centerBerkeleyRunningGooglecentroid12026-09-17

Tier 1: an official or company source. Tier 2: a news report resolving to the outlet's own page. Located: a site coordinate from a permit, a parcel or an address, or the county or town centroid. Verified: the last day a person read the source. A blank cell means not disclosed by any source on file.

Every South Carolina county (46)

6 of 46 counties have a record. A county without one is listed, not linked, until its first published record.

CountyCensus GEOIDProjectsRulesHow it treats data centers
Aiken County4500320
Beaufort County4501311
Berkeley County4501510
Dorchester County4503510
Spartanburg County4508311restrictive
York County4509110
Anderson County4500701restrictive
Charleston County4501901
Colleton County4502901restrictive
Fairfield County4503901
Greenwood County4504701
Jasper County4505301
Kershaw County4505501restrictive
Laurens County4505901restrictive
Marion County4506701
Newberry County4507101

A blank rating cell means no person has set one for the county. A county without a record is listed, not linked.

30 counties with no records yet
  • Abbeville County
  • Allendale County
  • Bamberg County
  • Barnwell County
  • Calhoun County
  • Cherokee County
  • Chester County
  • Chesterfield County
  • Clarendon County
  • Darlington County
  • Dillon County
  • Edgefield County
  • Florence County
  • Georgetown County
  • Greenville County
  • Hampton County
  • Horry County
  • Lancaster County
  • Lee County
  • Lexington County
  • Marlboro County
  • McCormick County
  • Oconee County
  • Orangeburg County
  • Pickens County
  • Richland County
  • Saluda County
  • Sumter County
  • Union County
  • Williamsburg County

The rules in South Carolina 13 rows · rating rests only on a binding act in force

What the state and its counties and cities have decided. Each row is rated by what it has decided, open, case by case, restrictive or closed, never by whether that is good or bad.

BodyLevelRatingIn force untilLatest actActsVerified
South Carolinastatecase by case until September 5, 20272027-09-05A one year water reporting requirement for data centers passed in the South Carolina state budget. yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet Sep 5, 20268 acts on this row
Every act on the South Carolina row
  1. approval

    South Carolina Department of Environmental Services approved permit for data center to build and operate 11 combustion turbines

    yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

  2. litigation

    South Carolina Public Service Commission dismissed legal challenge by Southern Environmental Law Center arguing the site was a power plant.

    southcarolinapublicradio.org (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  3. moratorium

    South Carolina introduced H 5526 to forbid local data center approval until comprehensive oversight process adopted.

    mashable.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

  4. event

    South Carolina passed ruling that power plants for data centers can be constructed without review or approval from state's regulatory commission

    capitalbnews.org (opens in a new tab) news outlet

  5. event

    South Carolina Public Service Commission ruled that private technology company generating power for its own use not subject to Utility Siting Act

    myclintonnews.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  6. hearing

    Spartanburg County Council held a special called meeting on data centers

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  7. moratorium

    Orangeburg and Fairfield counties hosted town halls on year long data center moratorium proposals

    postandcourier.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  8. event

    A one year water reporting requirement for data centers passed in the South Carolina state budget

    yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

Last verified September 21, 2026.

82026-09-21
Anderson Countycountyrestrictive until February 20, 20272027-02-20Anderson County Council passed a six month moratorium on data centers. foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet Aug 20, 20262 acts on this row
Every act on the Anderson County row
  1. moratorium adopted

    Anderson County approved a six month data center moratorium

    wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  2. moratorium adopted

    Anderson County Council passed a six month moratorium on data centers

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

Last verified September 23, 2026.

22026-09-23
Beaufort Countycountynot ratedBeaufort County council members proposed a freeze on data centers citing concerns about water, electricity and land use. yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet Reported Sep 121 act on this row
Every act on the Beaufort County row
  1. moratorium

    Beaufort County council members proposed a freeze on data centers citing concerns about water, electricity and land use

    yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

Last verified September 12, 2026.

12026-09-12
Colleton Countycountyrestrictive until March 14, 20272027-03-14The council passed a six month moratorium on data centers back in July. live5news.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet Sep 14, 20266 acts on this row
Every act on the Colleton County row
  1. litigation

    Miles Crosby and another resident sued to block a proposed 859 acre data center campus in Colleton County South Carolina

    latimes.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  2. moratorium adopted

    Colleton County Council unanimously approved Digital Infrastructure Overlay ordinance on September 14, 2026, allowing data centers in designated zones after having a moratorium.

    walterborolive.com (opens in a new tab) news outlet

  3. approval

    County Council voted unanimously to approve a controversial zoning change that opens the door to data centers across much of the county's rural land, through a new Digital Infrastructure Overlay District.

    live5news.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  4. ordinance

    Colleton County Planning Commission and Council approved first reading on August 10, 2026 of ordinance for digital infrastructure overlay related to data centers

    blufftontoday.com (opens in a new tab) news outlet

  5. moratorium adopted

    Colleton County Council approved six month moratorium on data centers in early July 2026

    blufftontoday.com (opens in a new tab) news outlet

  6. moratorium adopted

    The council passed a six month moratorium on data centers back in July. But that moratorium is now partially repealed and no longer applies west of Interstate 95, or in areas already zoned industrial with this overlay.

    live5news.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

Last verified September 23, 2026.

62026-09-23
Fairfield Countycountynot ratedOrdinance setting Fairfield County moratorium passed its second of three readings with public hearing set for Aug. 31 and final reading scheduled for Sept. 14. aol.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet Aug 172 acts on this row
Every act on the Fairfield County row
  1. moratorium adopted

    Ordinance setting Fairfield County moratorium passed its second of three readings with public hearing set for Aug. 31 and final reading scheduled for Sept. 14

    aol.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

  2. moratorium

    Fairfield County granted initial approval to a 12 month moratorium in August

    yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

Last verified September 5, 2026.

22026-09-05
Greenwood Countycountynot ratedGreenwood County approved a one year data center moratorium. wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet Reported Sep 232 acts on this row
Every act on the Greenwood County row
  1. moratorium adopted

    Greenwood County approved a one year data center moratorium

    wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  2. event

    Greenwood County Council approved the makeup of its Data Center Regulations Ad Hoc Committee in a 6-1 vote on September 16, 2026.

    indexjournal.com (opens in a new tab) news outlet

Last verified September 23, 2026.

22026-09-23
Jasper Countycountynot ratedNo dated act on this row yet.2026-09-12
Kershaw Countycountyrestrictive until September 23, 20272027-09-23Kershaw County Council voted unanimously to pass the final reading of the data center moratorium ordinance on Tuesday night. southcarolinapublicradio.org (opens in a new tab) local outlet Sep 22, 20262 acts on this row
Every act on the Kershaw County row
  1. moratorium adopted

    Kershaw County enacted a one year moratorium on data center development

    southcarolinapublicradio.org (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  2. moratorium adopted

    Kershaw County Council voted unanimously to pass the final reading of the data center moratorium ordinance on Tuesday night

    southcarolinapublicradio.org (opens in a new tab) local outlet

Last verified September 23, 2026.

22026-09-23
Laurens Countycountyrestrictive until September 16, 20272027-09-16Laurens County Council unanimously adopts Ordinance 1012 imposing 12 month moratorium on new data center applications and permits. golaurens.com (opens in a new tab) news outlet Sep 16, 20264 acts on this row
Every act on the Laurens County row
  1. moratorium adopted

    Laurens County approved a one year data center moratorium

    wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  2. moratorium adopted

    Laurens County Council unanimously adopts Ordinance 1012 imposing 12 month moratorium on new data center applications and permits

    golaurens.com (opens in a new tab) news outlet

  3. moratorium

    Laurens County Council voted on a one year data center pause or moratorium.

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  4. moratorium

    Laurens County Council advances moratorium on permits for new data center construction to public hearing and third final reading

    myclintonnews.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

Last verified September 23, 2026.

42026-09-23
Marion Countycountynot ratedThe project was approved by Marion County Council in January with tax breaks. datacenterdynamics.com (opens in a new tab) trade press January 20261 act on this row
Every act on the Marion County row
  1. approval

    The project was approved by Marion County Council in January with tax breaks

    datacenterdynamics.com (opens in a new tab) trade press

Last verified June 18, 2026.

12026-06-18
Mount Pleasantcitynot ratedMount Pleasant planning committee recommended a 120 day moratorium on data center development. yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet Reported Aug 311 act on this row
Every act on the Mount Pleasant row
  1. moratorium

    Mount Pleasant planning committee recommended a 120 day moratorium on data center development

    yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

Last verified September 5, 2026.

12026-09-05
Newberry Countycountynot ratedNewberry County approved a one year data center moratorium. wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet Reported Sep 231 act on this row
Every act on the Newberry County row
  1. moratorium adopted

    Newberry County approved a one year data center moratorium

    wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

Last verified September 23, 2026.

12026-09-23
Spartanburg Countycountyrestrictive until September 22, 20272027-09-22Spartanburg County Council voted 5-1 to approve a one year freeze on new data centers larger than 65 megawatts. foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet Sep 22, 202618 acts on this row
Every act on the Spartanburg County row
  1. moratorium adopted

    Spartanburg County Council approved a temporary one year moratorium for nearly all data center developments

    wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

    Also reported by 1 source
  2. event

    Data centers of 65 megawatts or less can still build in Spartanburg County over the next year if located in established industrial parks or on former industrial sites, and cannot generate their own electricity except for emergency backup

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  3. moratorium adopted

    Spartanburg County Council held third and final reading on proposed one year moratorium on new data center projects

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  4. moratorium

    Spartanburg County Council held special meeting on Monday to discuss data center projects and vote on countywide moratorium on new data center projects

    yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

  5. litigation

    Hearing held Thursday morning on whether to halt construction of Valara data center along South Pine Street; judge took issue under advisement.

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  6. litigation

    Residents filed lawsuit asking court to declare Spartanburg County comply with its own land development ordinance and require Valara Holdings to obtain major land development permit.

    yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

  7. litigation

    Hearing held in Spartanburg County Seventh Judicial Circuit Court to address lawsuit against Valara data center project on South Pine Street.

    yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet

  8. hearing

    Spartanburg County Council held a special meeting on data center development

    wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  9. event

    Spartanburg County Council held a lengthy and heated discussion about a proposed data center on September 9, 2026, with residents voicing concerns about public safety impacts.

    wspa.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  10. moratorium

    Council delayed a vote on the data center moratorium pending more information

    wspa.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  11. hearing

    Spartanburg County Council held a second hearing on the NorthMark Data Center proposal

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

    Also reported by 1 source
  12. event

    Committee held five hour meeting about a month ago with experts from power and water sectors and South Carolina Department of Environmental Services

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  13. moratorium

    County Council moved through first two readings of proposed 12 month data center moratorium; moratorium currently in effect under pending ordinance doctrine; final vote expected later this month

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  14. moratorium

    County planning and development staff denied proposed data center on Jones Road citing Unified Land Management Ordinance violations and noting inability to accept second application due to moratorium under consideration

    foxcarolina.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  15. moratorium

    Spartanburg County Council delayed a final vote on the proposed moratorium on new data center development until September

    wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  16. litigation

    Spartanburg County Board of Zoning Appeals denied the developer's appeal

    wyff4.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

  17. moratorium adopted

    Spartanburg County Council unanimously approved second reading of a moratorium ordinance on July 20, 2026

    goupstate.com (opens in a new tab) news outlet

  18. litigation

    Southern Environmental Law Center filed lawsuit July 6, 2026 on behalf of concerned citizens group challenging Spartanburg County land development classification

    myclintonnews.com (opens in a new tab) local outlet

    Also reported by 1 source

Last verified September 22, 2026.

182026-09-22

Reported: the source's date; the item names no day of its own. A month with no day: the source names the month and not the day. A rating rests only on a binding act in force; "not rated" means no person has set one. A blank cell means the record holds nothing for it.

South Carolina laws and the full scorecard

Bills and laws in South Carolina

1 signed into law, 10 bills tracked

10 bills tracked in the South Carolina legislature, 1 of them signed into law, grouped by where each stands. A row opens its own page; the South Carolina laws page has what each law requires.

Signed into law 1

  • Internet and Communications Service Providers Equipment

    H. 5122 Signed

    What it says and where it is from

    Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws By Adding Article 31 To Chapter 9, Title 58 So As To Permit Certain Items Sold To Or Used By Internet Access Service Providers And Communications Service Providers To Be Exempt From Sales Tax, To Establish A Process For Refunds On Taxes Paid On Exempt Items, And To Prohibit Data Centers From Claiming Or Utilizing These Exemptions Or Refunds. - Ratified Title As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.

    Source: the legislature's page (opens in a new tab). Found through LegiScan.

In committee 9, 5 shown here

  • Data Center Moratorium

    H. 5526 In committee

    What it says and where it is from

    Prohibit Governmental Entities Of This State, Counties, Municipalities, Or Political Subdivisions From Accepting Or Taking Any Action On Permits Or Applications For Data Centers Until The General Assembly Establishes A Comprehensive Oversight And Approval Process For New Data Centers In This State, And To Define "data Center." As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.

    Source: the legislature's page (opens in a new tab). Found through LegiScan.

  • Energy Affordability Act

    H. 5484 In committee

    What it says and where it is from

    Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws By Enacting The "energy Affordability Act" By Amending Section 58-37-20, Relating To The Public Service Commission, So As To Provide For Demand side Pilot Programs; By Amending Section 58-37-120, Relating To Applications For Permit, So As To Require A Public Comment Period For Any Application For A Permit For An Energy Infrastructure Project, And To Require Notice To Affected Landowners If A Public Utility That Plans To Construct, Or Has Entered Into Agreements To Construct, An Energy Infrastructure Project That May Result In The Use Of Eminent Domain And To Prescribe The Methods And Content Of The Notice, And To Require The Office Of Regulatory Staff To Provide The Property Owner A Summary Of Owner Rights Under State Eminent Domain Law If The Property Owner Contacts The Office Of Regulatory Staff After Receiving Notice; By Adding Section 58-27-835 So As To Provide For The Terms And Conditions Of Electric Service To Commercial Data Centers; By Adding Section 58-27-836 So As To Provide For Reports To The Department Of Environmental Services Concerning Surface And Ground Water Used By Commercial Data Centers; By Adding Section 58-27-837 So As To Require Commercial Data Centers To File Decommissioning Plans And Decommissioning Financial Assurance Instruments With The Department Of Environmental Services; By Amending Section 12-36-2120, Relating To Exemptions From Sales Tax, So As To Provide That The Computer Equipment Exemption Is Available To A Taxpayer That Entered Into A Fee in lieu Agreement On Or Before May 30, 2026; To Provide That The Exemption For Electricity Used By A Technology Intensive Facility Is Not Available To A Taxpayer That Did Not Claim The Credit Prior To May 30, 2026; To Provide That To Claim The Exemption For Original Or Replacement Computers, Computer Equipment, And Computer Hardware And Software Purchases Used In A Datacenter, The Taxpayer Must Have Notified The Departments Of Revenue And Commerce Of Its Intention To Claim The Credit On Or Before May 30, 2026; And To Provide That The Exemption For Original Or Replacement Computers, Computer Equipment, And Computer Hardware And Software Purchases Used In A Datacenter The Taxpayer Must Have Been Certified By The Department Of Commerce Prior To May 30, 2030; And By Amending Section 58-27-840, Relating To Prohibitions On Preferences And Unreasonable Rates, So As To Require Electrical Utilities To Offer Discounted Rates To Low Income Households, Subject To The Commission's Approval. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.

    Source: the legislature's page (opens in a new tab). Found through LegiScan.

  • Data Center Moratorium

    H. 5286 In committee

    What it says and where it is from

    Prohibit Governmental Entities Of This State, Counties, Municipalities, Or Political Subdivisions From Granting Final Approval For Applications Or Permits For, Or Incentives Or Other Requests Related To, New Data Centers Until January 1, 2028, And To Define "data Center." As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.

    Source: the legislature's page (opens in a new tab). Found through LegiScan.

  • Data Center Utility Costs

    H. 5215 In committee

    What it says and where it is from

    Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws So As To Enact The "south Carolina Ratepayer Protection And Large Load Customer Infrastructure Accountability Act" By Adding Chapter 44 To Title 58 So As To Provide Definitions, Prohibit Incremental Costs Resulting From Large Load Customers To Be Recovered From Customers In Another Customer Class; To Establish Contract Requirements Between Large Load Customers And Electrical Utilities; To Establish Review Standards For The Public Service Commission; And To Require Annual Reports From Large Load Customers; By Adding Section 13-1-80 So As To Establish Requirements Regarding Incentives That May Be Offered To Potential Large Load Customers; By Adding Section 6-29-550 So As To Establish Requirements Regarding Public Notice, Public Hearings, And Local Governmental Certifications Concerning Planning And Zoning Prior To The Receipt Of Certain Permits Or Incentives; And By Adding Section 49-1-100 So As To Require Potential Large Load Customers To Provide Plans Regarding Water Resources And Annual Reporting Requirements To The Department Of Environmental Services, And To Require The Department Of Environmental Services To Verify Water Usage Contingency Plan Adherence In The Event Of A Drought. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.

    Source: the legislature's page (opens in a new tab). Found through LegiScan.

  • Data Centers

    S. 902 In committee

    What it says and where it is from

    Amend The South Carolina Code Of Laws So As To Enact The "data Center Siting Act"; By Adding Section 58-44-10 So As To Define Terms Pertaining To Data Center Siting; By Adding Section 58-44-20 So As To Require A Certificate Issued By The Public Service Commission Before A Data Center May Begin Operations In South Carolina And To Provide For The Application Process; By Adding Section 58-44-30 So As To Provide For The Certification Proceeding Process; By Adding Section 58-44-40 So As To Provide For The Parties To A Certification Proceeding; By Adding Section 58-44-50 So As To Provide For The Evaluative Criteria For Consideration Of An Application; By Adding Section 58-44-60 So As To Provide For The Creation Of A Record Of Any Hearing And Testimony Taken Certification Proceeding; By Adding Section 58-44-70 So As To Provide For The Requirements For Granting Or Denying An Application; By Adding Section 58-44-80 So As To Provide For The Issuance Of An Order By The Commission; By Adding Section 58-44-90 So As To Provide For Operational Efficiency Standards; By Adding Section 58-44-100 So As To Provide For Water Efficiency Standards; By Adding Section 58-44-110 So As To Provide For Annual Reporting On Compliance With Water Efficiency Standards And Operational Efficiency Standards; By Adding Section 58-44-120 So As To Provide For Infrastructure Adequacy Assessments, To Provide For Environmental Impact Assessments, And To Provide For Reasonable Buffer Requirements; By Adding Section 58-44-130 So As To Provide For The Public Service Commission's Role Concerning Rates, Agreements Between Utilities And Data Centers, And Cost Allocation Methodologies; By Adding Section 58-44-140 So As To Provide For Decommissioning Plans And Financial Assurances Associated With Decommissioning; By Adding Section 58-44-150 So As To Provide For The Interaction Between The Provisions Of This Chapter And Local Governments And Local Government Land Use Planning; By Adding Section 58-44-160 So As To Require Data Centers To Implement Reasonable Measures To Minimize Noise, Vibration, And Light Impacts Resulting From Their Operation; By Adding Section 58-44-170 So As To Provide Protections For Confidential Information Shared By Data Center Operators; By Adding Section 58-44-180 So As To Clarify The Interaction Between This Chapter And Other Environmental Laws; By Adding Section 58-44-190 So As To Provide For Enforcement And Penalties; To Provide For Regulations From The Public Service Commission, The Office Of Regulatory Staff, And The Department Of Environmental Services; Provide That For Two Years After Enactment The Department Of Environmental Services Shall Prioritize Technical Assistance And Guidance Over Enforcement To Facilitate Industry Transition To The New Requirements; Authorize The Public Service Commission To Create A Generic Docket By The Public Service Commission To Implement This Act And Develop Regulations; And Provide For Annual Reporting By The Public Service Commission. As published by the legislature, found through LegiScan.

    Source: the legislature's page (opens in a new tab). Found through LegiScan.

4 more in committee on the South Carolina laws page.

10 bills tracked, 1 signed · LegiScan, CC BY 4.0

NumberSessionStatusDateTitle
H. 5122 126th General Assembly Signed 2026-06-03 Internet and Communications Service Providers Equipment
H. 5526 126th General Assembly In committee 2026-04-14 Data Center Moratorium
H. 5484 126th General Assembly In committee 2026-04-01 Energy Affordability Act
H. 5286 126th General Assembly In committee 2026-02-26 Data Center Moratorium
H. 5215 126th General Assembly In committee 2026-02-19 Data Center Utility Costs
S. 902 126th General Assembly In committee 2026-02-10 Data Centers
S. 867 126th General Assembly In committee 2026-01-29 Data Center Development
H. 4583 126th General Assembly In committee 2026-01-13 The South Carolina Data Center Responsibility Act
S. 724 126th General Assembly In committee 2026-01-13 Commercial Data Center Water Usage Report
S. 784 126th General Assembly In committee 2026-01-13 Energy

10 bills tracked in South Carolina; 126th General Assembly, legislature in session; last checked October 26, 2026. The last check found no bill not already tracked; the 10 tracked bills stand. Search terms: data center, data centre, large load, hyperscale, computing facility, server farm, high load factor (indirect), energy intensive facility (indirect), large electric load (indirect), digital asset mining (indirect), cryptocurrency mining (indirect), qualified technology facility (indirect), colocation (indirect), moratorium (with another term), sales tax exemption (with another term). The search on LegiScan. (opens in a new tab)

Bill data from LegiScan (opens in a new tab), licensed CC BY 4.0 (opens in a new tab). The record chooses the bills, writes each stage in its own words and cites the legislature's own page for every bill.

How this state's members voted

H.R. 9340, Ratepayer Protection Act: U.S. House of Representatives, roll call 312, September 16, 2026. On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended. Passed, 417 to 3. South Carolina's members: 7 yea, 0 nay. How each member voted

MemberPartyPosition
Biggs (SC)RYea
ClyburnDYea
FryRYea
MaceRYea
NormanRYea
TimmonsRYea
Wilson (SC)RYea

A blank party cell means the clerk's roll gives none.

H.R. 9340, Ratepayer Protection Act: U.S. Senate, roll call 254, September 30, 2026. On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed H.R. 9340. Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected, 57 to 43. South Carolina's members: 2 yea, 0 nay. How each member voted

MemberPartyPosition
Graham (R-SC)RYea
Scott (R-SC)RYea

A blank party cell means the clerk's roll gives none.

Positions as the clerk records them. How bills and votes are recorded.

What happened

  1. Moratorium adoptedAnderson County

    Anderson County approved a six month data center moratorium

  2. Moratorium adoptedNewberry County

    Newberry County approved a one year data center moratorium

  3. Moratorium adoptedGreenwood County

    Greenwood County approved a one year data center moratorium

  4. Moratorium adoptedLaurens County

    Laurens County approved a one year data center moratorium

  5. Moratorium adoptedKershaw County

    Kershaw County enacted a one year moratorium on data center development

The full South Carolina timeline, year by year

What was said

Since the site began operating, it has used about 14,000 gallons a day. We estimate the data center will use about 165 gallons a day.
Pierre DuBois, Spokesperson, AIB Data Centers · October 13, 2026 · quoted · Post and Courier (opens in a new tab) local outlet
Republican incumbent Darline Graham opposes a data center moratorium, citing national security competition with China
Darline Graham, U.S. Senator (R-South Carolina) · October 12, 2026 · paraphrased · Greenville Online (opens in a new tab) local outlet

Every South Carolina statement, by speaker (54)

42 more on this page, one per speaker and claim; 54 statements in all

Darline Graham, Republican senator, said she is concerned about data centers and thinks there needs to be community involvement when it comes to data centers

U.S. Senator WTOC (opens in a new tab) local outlet · [Archived Copy] (opens in a new tab)
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: WTOC (opens in a new tab).

Archived copy: Wayback Machine (opens in a new tab).

Also reported by: The State (opens in a new tab) local outlet .

Darline Graham, Republican U.S. Senator, said a two year moratorium on data centers would be dangerous to national security because China would get ahead.

U.S. Senator, Republican WIS News 10 (opens in a new tab) local outlet · [Archived Copy] (opens in a new tab)
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; content date; reported from elsewhere.

Primary source: WIS News 10 (opens in a new tab).

Archived copy: Wayback Machine (opens in a new tab).

Also reported by: The State (opens in a new tab) local outlet , WRDW (opens in a new tab) local outlet .

Kasie Whitener, Libertarian U.S. Senate candidate, said local communities need to have a voice in data center decisions and it is a local issue.

Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; content date; reported from elsewhere.

Primary source: WIS News 10 (opens in a new tab).

Archived copy: Wayback Machine (opens in a new tab).

Also reported by: WRDW (opens in a new tab) local outlet .

Andrews said large data centers are receiving billions of dollars in tax breaks while local families deal with high costs

South Carolina Democratic Senate candidate WRDW (opens in a new tab) local outlet
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: WRDW (opens in a new tab).

Dr. Stephen Smith with Southern Alliance for Clean Energy expressed concern about electricity demand unknowns with future data center developments

WYFF (opens in a new tab) local outlet
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: WYFF (opens in a new tab).

Dr. Octavia Amaechi, Spartanburg County Commissioner of Public Works, expressed concern about the magnitude of the change in water demand projections and questions about how the projections changed and long term water use implications.

WYFF (opens in a new tab) local outlet project record
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: WYFF (opens in a new tab).

Spartanburg Water reaffirmed that it has enough capacity to serve the project without negatively affecting existing or future customers.

Spartanburg Water (unnamed spokesperson) WYFF (opens in a new tab) local outlet project record
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: WYFF (opens in a new tab).

Jermaine Johnson, Democratic nominee for governor, introduced a resolution in the General Assembly calling for a moratorium on data center construction until the Legislature passes an oversight and approval process.

yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: yahoo.com (opens in a new tab).

Alan Wilson, Republican nominee for governor, said local communities should have the right to determine if they want data centers in their areas and that operators should be incentivized to lessen environmental impact.

yahoo.com (opens in a new tab) national outlet
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: yahoo.com (opens in a new tab).

Rep. Nancy Mace said the U.S. must stay ahead of China with AI but should not put data centers in residential neighborhoods

U.S. Representative (R-South Carolina) Fox News (opens in a new tab) national outlet
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: Fox News (opens in a new tab).

Rep. Ralph Norman said decisions about data centers should be left to states and local communities under 10th Amendment rights

U.S. Representative (R-South Carolina) Fox News (opens in a new tab) national outlet
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: Fox News (opens in a new tab).

Matthew Brownlee says the time will be used to hear from residents, planners and industry experts and to look at issues like water use, electricity and environmental impacts

Laurens County Vice Chairman FOX Carolina News (opens in a new tab) local outlet
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: FOX Carolina News (opens in a new tab).

Frank Holleman, Southern Environmental Law Center, raised concerns about formaldehyde pollution from on site power generation

WYFF (opens in a new tab) local outlet project record
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: WYFF (opens in a new tab).

Sarah Knox, Valara Holdings spokesperson, said the project would use 97 percent of its own energy capacity and minimize grid reliance

Valara Holdings Computing Center spokesperson WYFF (opens in a new tab) local outlet project record
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: WYFF (opens in a new tab).

Sarah Knox said the project will not use groundwater aquifers or wells

Valara Holdings Computing Center spokesperson WYFF (opens in a new tab) local outlet project record
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: WYFF (opens in a new tab).

Many South Carolina counties studying the footprints of large data centers

Rob Merchant, Planning Director Yahoo (opens in a new tab) national outlet
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: Yahoo (opens in a new tab).

Frank Holleman, senior attorney with Southern Environmental Law Center, questioned air quality modeling and formaldehyde exposure limits

Senior Attorney, Southern Environmental Law Center WSPA 7News (opens in a new tab) local outlet project record
Context & source notes

Provenance: Paraphrased; said in the source itself.

Primary source: WSPA 7News (opens in a new tab).

On the November 3, 2026 ballot in South Carolina: Governor (4), U.S. Senate (4), U.S. House, District 1 (3), U.S. House, District 2 (3), U.S. House, District 3 (3), U.S. House, District 4 (3), U.S. House, District 5 (2), U.S. House, District 6 (2), U.S. House, District 7 (2); 6 of 26 candidates with a statement on data centers on the record. Every candidate.

Already running in South Carolina

2 sites are serving load, 1 of them in Berkeley County.

See the 2 running sites
  1. Google Berkeley County data center Berkeley County Running · Operational since 2008 (18 years)
  2. Meta Aiken Data Center Aiken, Aiken County Running

Questions about South Carolina data centers

How many data center projects are on the record in South Carolina?

7 projects are on the record in South Carolina: 3 reported, 2 being built, 2 running and 3 not yet verified. Each is listed under Projects with its status history and sources. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers

answered from the rows above

Where in South Carolina are they?

Records are in 6 counties: Aiken County (2), Beaufort County (1), Berkeley County (1), Dorchester County (1), Spartanburg County (1) and York County (1). The county table lists every county with its count, zero included. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers

answered from the rows above

How much power is disclosed for data centers in South Carolina?

450 MW is disclosed across 1 of 7 records: NorthMark Spartanburg County Data Center (450 MW, third party estimate, source (opens in a new tab)). The other 6 records have not disclosed capacity. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers

answered from the rows above

How much water do data centers in South Carolina say they will use?

Not disclosed. None of the 7 records on file for South Carolina states a water figure. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers

answered from the rows above

Who is building data centers in South Carolina?

5 developers are named on the record: Google (2 records), Amentum / DC Blox, Meta, NorthMark and QTS Data Centers. 1 record names no developer; each name above opens the record, where the developer's source is listed. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers

answered from the rows above

Which counties and cities in South Carolina have rules about data centers?

12 county and city rows are on the record, 5 of them rated: Anderson County is rated restrictive: Anderson County Council passed a six month moratorium on data centers, August 20, 2026, source (opens in a new tab), Colleton County is rated restrictive: The council passed a six month moratorium on data centers back in July, September 14, 2026, source (opens in a new tab) and Kershaw County is rated restrictive: Kershaw County Council voted unanimously to pass the final reading of the data center moratorium ordinance on Tuesday night, September 22, 2026, source (opens in a new tab). The state's own row is rated case by case, with 8 dated acts listed under the scorecard. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers

answered from the rows above

What is proposed or being built near me in South Carolina, by county?

5 records are not yet running. Aiken County: Amentum / DC Blox Savannah River AI Data Center (reported); Beaufort County: Hilton Head Area Data Centers (reported); Dorchester County: Google Dorchester County data center (being built); Spartanburg County: NorthMark Spartanburg County Data Center (reported); and York County: QTS York County (being built). A county name opens its page with the map and every record there. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers

answered from the rows above

What has the state of South Carolina itself decided?

1 state law is on the record: H. 5122 (signed, June 3, 2026, source (opens in a new tab)). The state's own scorecard row carries 8 dated acts, the newest reported September 21, 2026; the laws page has what each law requires in the words of its text. Resources: the questions people ask about data centers

answered from the rows above

Disclosed figures

450 MW power

summed only where a record disclosed the figure

FigureDisclosed totalDisclosedWithout a figureBasis
Power450 MW161 third party estimate
Water, stated per day07
Water, stated per year07
Permanent jobs07
Tax each year07

A blank cell means no record in South Carolina disclosed the figure. Third party figures on the same metrics are listed apart below; a figure a project disclosed about itself is never mixed with them.

FigureDisclosed totalDisclosedWithout a figureBasis
Power450 MW161 third party estimate
Water, stated per day07
Water, stated per year07
Permanent jobs07
Tax each year07

A blank total means no record disclosed the figure; the count without one says how many.

Summed only where a record disclosed the figure; a record with no figure adds nothing and is counted as not disclosed. Water is summed per day and per year separately, as the sources stated it, and never converted. A tax claim given as a range is summed at both ends.

The disclosed totals are in the table above.

No source on file states what any of the 7 tracked facilities in South Carolina are for. 3 sites not yet verified are named apart and are not in that number.

What each use disclosed

UseRecordsPowerWaterJobsTax each year
No stated use7450 MW

A blank cell means no record with that use disclosed the figure.

A record that lists several uses counts once under each. Each cell is the sum over the records with that use, disclosed rows only.

No source on file states how any of the 7 tracked facilities in South Carolina are cooled. 3 sites not yet verified are named apart and are not in that number.

Sources read for South Carolina

12 sources

12 sources are read for South Carolina:

Newspapers
The Post and Courier
Public broadcaster
South Carolina Public Radio
Economic development
South Carolina Department of Commerce
Search feeds
9 news searches
Every feed, with its kind and tier

About this data

Last verified
Next check Feeds every four hours, pages daily.
Figures Only what a source states, with its basis. Nothing is estimated, and a figure no source gives reads not disclosed.
License Data CC BY-NC 4.0 (opens in a new tab); free for personal, academic, civic and newsroom reporting with attribution. Commercial, enterprise, financial or AI training use needs a commercial license. Prose stays under copyright.
Cite this page Data Center Record, "Data centers in South Carolina", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/sc, updated October 19, 2026. CSV · JSON · GeoJSON
Cite this page

Data Center Record, "Data center records in South Carolina", https://datacenterrecord.org/states/sc. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY-NC 4.0.

The structured rows are CC BY-NC 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.

Report a change
For researchers
State code
SC
Rating of the state's own row
Case by case
Count by status
reported 3, being built 2, running 2, not yet verified 3
Located records
0 located, 7 at a centroid, 0 without coordinates

Researcher view · South Carolina · 7 data center sites, 0 buildings where disclosed, 13 rule rows, 10 bills · basis and source tier on every row · verified October 19, 2026

Download CSV JSON GeoJSON