Data Center Record.
MO Wildwood City Council June 15, 2026

De Soto data center concerns: Leaders discuss solutions for noise pollution

In Wildwood, St. Louis County (MO), Wildwood City Council and local residents debated municipal data center siting, utility infrastructure load, water consumption, and zoning rules during the June 15, 2026 session.

Jurisdiction Wildwood, MO
Governing Body Wildwood City Council
Meeting Date June 15, 2026
Extracted Clips 2 clips · 1 opposed · 0 supporting
Archived meeting broadcast · KMBC 9 Ready at Clip 1 (0:34 to 1:01) · Wildwood City Council Officials and Speakers
Open source video on YouTube ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Privacy enhanced player · zero third party requests until clicked

De Soto data center concerns: Leaders discuss solutions for noise pollution

Wildwood City Council · June 15, 2026

Timestamped Speaker & Testimony Ledger

2 verified timestamped clips extracted chronologically from the closed caption record. Select any clip to play that exact window in the master player or copy a canonical clip link.

  1. Clip 1 · 0:34 Wildwood City Council Officials and Speakers Elected Official Questioning auto captions, unchecked
    Zoning Power & Grid Water

    Officials and speakers in Wildwood, MO address municipal data center zoning, grid capacity, and community impacts.

    "IT’S THE SITE OF A NEW $3 BILLION DATA CENTER, WITH CONSTRUCTION TAKING PLACE OVER THE NEXT NINE YEARS. DE SOTO CITY COUNCILMAN ZACK BRADLEY IS CONCERNED NOISE COULD BE HARMFUL TO HUMAN HEALTH. HE’S LOOKING INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF CHANGING THE CITY’S ORDINANCE TO MAKE SURE THE DEVELOPER, BEAL INFRASTRUCTURE, PROTECTS THE PUBLIC. I THINK THEY CAN MITIGATE SOUND POLLUTION SEVERAL WAYS."

    YouTube at 0:34 ↗ (opens in a new tab)
  2. Clip 2 · 1:12 Resident public comment Resident Public Comment auto captions, unchecked

    Community members and local officials in Wildwood, MO weigh water supply, electricity rates, and neighborhood buffer rules.

    "MOST DESOTO RESIDENTS LIVE NORTH OF THAT HIGHWAY. FOR THAT REASON, IT’S UNLIKE THE SPRING HILL AND GARDNER NOW WITHDRAWN PLANS. THOSE PROPOSALS WOULD HAVE USED LARGELY AGRICULTURAL LAND CLOSE TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. AND IT’S LARGELY SEPARATED FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS, SO IT’S A GOOD FIT. MUCH LIKE THE INDEPENDENCE DATA CENTER PLAN, THERE’S A PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT, BUT THE DEVELOPERS HAVE A PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES OR PILOT DESIGNED TO HELP DE SOTO SCHOOLS."

    YouTube at 1:12 ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Using this data in a report? Support the record.

Researcher view · basis and source tier on every row · docket and Census GEOIDs · citation and export tools

Commercial and bulk data