Data Center Record.

Reported Built from one source

Nottingham Data Center (unnamed developer)

A data center proposal in Nottingham was withdrawn by the developer amid widespread community opposition hours before opponents were to pack a town meeting, with a 12 month moratorium on data center construction subsequently heading to a town vote. It is reported, as reported June 3, 2026.

How much power it needs, how much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.

Last verified · 24 sources, 0 primary · A skeleton record: built from one source, not yet reviewed in depth by a person. · How to read this page

How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.

What is known

Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.

Land
Not disclosed
Power it would draw
Not disclosed
Water
Not disclosed
Who leads it
Thomas Moulton
as stated by the source [11]
Who would use it
Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs
Not disclosed
Tax each year
Not disclosed
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)

Impact figures

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
How much power it needs Not disclosed
How much water it would use Not disclosed
How loud it would be Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs Not disclosed
Tax it would pay each year Not disclosed

The record's fields

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
Who is building it Thomas Moulton as stated by the source [11] businessnhmagazine.com September 25, 2026
Who is constructing it Not disclosed
How much land Not disclosed
Where its power comes from Not disclosed
Grid connection Not disclosed
How it is cooled Not disclosed

The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.

Still not public, and where it would show up

The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.

  • Water useA state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
  • Who would use itA lease announcement or a tenant named in a filing.
  • Power the campus would drawA utility or public service commission docket, an interconnection filing, or an air permit for an on site plant.
  • Jobs and taxAn incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.

What was decided

Acts of Rockingham County and Nottingham about data centers, on the record with their source. A rule about the area is not a decision about this record.

DateWhoDecisionSource
Nottingham restrictive Nottingham residents voted in favor of a 12 month moratorium on data center development with 1,335 votes in favor to 143 against nenc.news
Nottingham restrictive The vote was 1,335 in favor, to 143 against ctpublic.org
Nottingham restrictive Nottingham residents voted in favor of a 12 month moratorium on any data center development within town limits ctpublic.org
Nottingham restrictive Nottingham held a town vote on 12 month moratorium on data center construction by 2026-07-03 nhpr.org
Nottingham restrictive The planning board's workshop meeting will be held at 7 p.m. on June 3 at the town office building businessnhmagazine.com

What happened

  1. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    A feasibility study is planned in Bow for a hyperscale data center likely on the site of the former coal fired power plant owned by Granite Shore Power, LLC [17]

  2. · Status: rumored (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Moulton withdrew his application hours before the planning board meeting last Wednesday [11]

The full Nottingham Data Center (unnamed developer) timeline, in order

11 corrections to this record

Every correction, with its reason
  1. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  2. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  3. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  4. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  5. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  6. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  7. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  8. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  9. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  10. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  11. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

Every correction on the record is on the corrections page.

What was said

Governor Kelly Ayotte proposed a statewide moratorium on data centers in next state budget
Kelly Ayotte, New Hampshire Governor · September 9, 2026 · paraphrased · nenc.news local outlet
Kristen Lamb said residents want to move forward with a moratorium or make it explicit that data centers cannot be approved
Kristen Lamb, Nottingham conservation committee and master plan update subcommittee member · June 3, 2026 · paraphrased · www.businessnhmagazine.com local outlet

Every statement about data centers in New Hampshire, by speaker

1 more statement on this page

Nottingham conservation committee and master plan update subcommittee member

Kristen Lamb expressed concerns about water quality impacts, increased electricity bills and noise pollution from the data center

June 3, 2026, www.businessnhmagazine.com · www.businessnhmagazine.com local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

The site

Where in Rockingham County is not in the public record. The pin marks the county seat, not a building, and the outline is the county.

  • This record: Proposed, ringed
  • data center
  • Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
  • Smaller pins: 3 other published records in New Hampshire
Details
  • this record's location, ringed
  • parcel outline, from the county parcel record
  • city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
  • county boundary

The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.

Where
Nottingham, Rockingham County, New Hampshire
How exactly it is located
County level, the county seat
The parcel
No parcel outline in the public record
Nearest homes
Not computed for a record placed at a place center
Nearest records
Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at a county seat.

Questions about this project

4 questions answered from the record

Answered from the rows on this page.

Who is building Nottingham Data Center (unnamed developer)?

Thomas Moulton is the developer, source. No construction contractor is named on the record yet.

How much power and water does Nottingham Data Center (unnamed developer) say it needs?

Power: not disclosed by any source on file. Water: not disclosed by any source on file.

Where does Nottingham Data Center (unnamed developer) stand today?

It is reported, as reported June 3, 2026. The newest entry, reported September 9, 2026: A feasibility study is planned in Bow for a hyperscale data center likely on the site of the former coal fired power plant owned by Granite Shore Power, LLC [17].

What has Nottingham or Rockingham County decided about it?

Nottingham (rated restrictive): Nottingham residents voted in favor of a 12 month moratorium on data center development with 1,335 votes in favor to 143 against (reported September 9, 2026, source); and Nottingham: The vote was 1,335 in favor, to 143 against (reported September 9, 2026, source). 5 events are on the county's rows; a rule about the area is not a decision about this record.

Sources

Primary documents first: filings, minutes, dockets and official pages. Then reporting. The numbers are the ones the entries above cite.

Reporting

  1. Nottingham data center plan withdrawn. Seacoast businessman explains why. - Seacoastonline.com, Seacoastonline.com, May 27, 2026, query feed
  2. Developer behind Nottingham data center donated to Kelly Ayotte - Granite Post News, Granite Post News, June 11, 2026, query feed
  3. Entrepreneur faces backlash over Nottingham data center - Valley News, Valley News, May 28, 2026, query feed
  4. Nottingham data center proposal withdrawn after backlash - New Hampshire Public Radio, New Hampshire Public Radio, May 27, 2026, query feed
  5. Nottingham data center plan may be revived; town weighs 12‑month ban - Seacoastonline.com, Seacoastonline.com, June 29, 2026, query feed
  6. New Hampshire can't wait on data center action: Warmington - Seacoastonline.com, Seacoastonline.com, June 23, 2026, query feed
  7. Proposal for data center in Nottingham, New Hampshire, withdrawn after facing intense opposition - Data Center Dynamics, Data Center Dynamics, June 3, 2026, query feed
  8. Nottingham data center proposal sparks controversy - vnews.com, vnews.com, June 6, 2026, query feed
  9. Power-hungry data centers don’t fit New Hampshire realities - The Washington Post, The Washington Post, January 12, 2026, query feed
  10. Nottingham's data center challenge a concern for all Granite Staters: Rafter - seacoastonline.com, seacoastonline.com, June 24, 2026, query feed
  11. As Nottingham Continues to Address Backlash to Data Center Proposal, What Does NH Law Say?, www.businessnhmagazine.com, June 3, 2026, local outlet
  12. AI Data Center Paused Amid Uproar in Nottingham - InDepthNH.org, InDepthNH.org, May 27, 2026, local outlet
12 more sources
  1. Plans for data center in NH withdrawn amid widespread community opposition - NBC Boston, NBC Boston, May 27, 2026, local outlet
  2. New Hampshire data center developer withdraws plans hours before opponents were to pack town meeting - Business Insider, Business Insider, May 27, 2026, local outlet
  3. Data center proposal in Nottingham stirs controversy and statewide attention - New Hampshire Public Radio, New Hampshire Public Radio, May 26, 2026, local outlet
  4. Data center proposal in Nottingham faces pushback from some residents - WMUR, WMUR, May 22, 2026, local outlet
  5. Nottingham, NH voters overwhelmingly approve moratorium on data centers - nenc.news, nenc.news, September 9, 2026, local outlet
  6. Nottingham voters overwhelmingly approve moratorium on data centers - New Hampshire Public Radio, New Hampshire Public Radio, September 9, 2026, local outlet
  7. Proposal for data center in Nottingham withdrawn - WMUR, WMUR, May 28, 2026, local outlet
  8. Nottingham data center proposal withdrawn after backlash - nhbr.com, nhbr.com, June 5, 2026, local outlet
  9. Data Center Proposed for Nottingham Property - InDepthNH.org, InDepthNH.org, May 20, 2026, local outlet
  10. Developer may bring controversial data center proposal back to New Hampshire as town seeks moratorium - The Cool Down, The Cool Down, July 3, 2026, local outlet
  11. Nottingham’s 12-month moratorium on data center construction heads to a town vote - New Hampshire Public Radio, New Hampshire Public Radio, July 3, 2026, local outlet
  12. How a data center proposal ignited opposition in Nottingham and surrounding communities - New Hampshire Bulletin, New Hampshire Bulletin, May 29, 2026, local outlet

24 sources on file.

Cite this record

Data Center Record, "Nottingham Data Center (unnamed developer)", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/nottingham-data-center-unnamed-developer-nh, last verified September 25, 2026.

Last verified , first recorded . Every correction is logged on the corrections page and under What happened.

Cite this page

Data Center Record, "Nottingham Data Center (unnamed developer)", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/nottingham-data-center-unnamed-developer-nh. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.

The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.

Report a change
For researchers
Slug
nottingham-data-center-unnamed-developer-nh
Status value
rumored
Stage
Proposed
Tier
skeleton
Tags
skeleton
Place id
us/nh/rockingham-county/nottingham
Coordinates
42.97861, -71.07278
Location precision
county
Location source
County seat (Brentwood), Wikidata, placed at county level
Coordinate source
wikidata county seat
Location source number
Not disclosed
Location last verified
September 16, 2026
EPA registry id
Not disclosed
Use type values
not_disclosed
Tenancy value
not_disclosed
Cooling type value
not_disclosed
Capacity basis
not_disclosed
Water basis
not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
Acreage basis
Not disclosed
Interconnection value
not_disclosed
Capacity, if disclosed
Not disclosed
Rating of the county's rows
Restrictive
Published
2026-09-05
Last verified
2026-09-25