Data Center Record.

Reported Built from one source

Bow Data Center (350 MW)

An unnamed company asked Eversource to assess a potential 350 MW data center facility in Bow, and Bow is reported to be in talks to become the site of a new hyperscale data center. It is reported, as reported September 1, 2026.

How much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.

Last verified · 5 sources, 0 primary · A skeleton record: built from one source, not yet reviewed in depth by a person. · How to read this page

How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.

What is known

Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.

Land
343 acres
third party estimate [3]
Power it would draw
350 MW
not disclosed
Water
Not disclosed
Who leads it
Not disclosed
Who would use it
Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs
Not disclosed
Tax each year
Not disclosed
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)

Impact figures

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
How much power it needs 350 MW not disclosed September 25, 2026
How much water it would use Not disclosed
How loud it would be Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs Not disclosed
Tax it would pay each year Not disclosed

The record's fields

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
Who is building it Not disclosed
Who is constructing it Not disclosed
How much land 343 acres third party estimate [3] concordmonitor.com September 25, 2026
Where its power comes from Not disclosed
Grid connection Not disclosed
How it is cooled Not disclosed

The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.

Still not public, and where it would show up

The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.

  • Water useA state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
  • Who would use itA lease announcement or a tenant named in a filing.
  • Who is behind itA land record, a zoning application or a company's own announcement.
  • Jobs and taxAn incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.

What happened

  1. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Granite Shore Power filed a request with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to discuss connecting a 350 megawatt project to the regional power grid. [3]

  2. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Merrimack Station coal fired power plant in Bow set to cease operations in 2028 [5]

  3. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Granite Shore Power filed request for 350 megawatt facility interconnection to power grid [5]

  4. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Public Service of New Hampshire, subsidiary of Eversource Energy, filed viability assessment with Granite Shore Power LLC in April 2026 [5]

  5. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Data center would use Merrimack River for cooling water source [2]

  6. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Town official confirmed high level discussions between company and Bow about bringing data center to town [2]

  7. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Merrimack Station is former coal fired power plant that closed in September 2025 [2]

  8. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Granite Shore Power filed request with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in April 2026 to enter discussions with Eversource about connecting 350 megawatt project to power grid [2]

1 earlier entry
  1. · reported (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    FERC filing shows Granite Shore Power requested viability study for data center project at Merrimack Station site in Bow, filed in April 2026 [1]

The full Bow Data Center (350 MW) timeline, in order

5 corrections to this record

Every correction, with its reason
  1. · the speaker role of a statements row

    Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Governor Kelly Ayotte": the title in front of the name (Governor) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.

  2. · the speaker of a statements row

    Speaker read again from the statement's source line, "Governor Kelly Ayotte": the title in front of the name (Governor) is the role, not part of the name. The old and new text.

  3. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  4. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  5. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

Every correction on the record is on the corrections page.

What was said

Senate President Sharon Carson said that the Senate would explore legislation to protect New Hampshire taxpayers from data center development costs.
Sharon Carson, Senate President · September 23, 2026 · paraphrased · Concord Monitor local outlet
Governor Kelly Ayotte stated in response to Bow proposal that she will advocate for towns to decide what is best for them but thinks it is best to institute a moratorium because too many unknowns surround data centers
Kelly Ayotte, Governor of New Hampshire · September 2, 2026 · paraphrased · New Hampshire Bulletin local outlet

Every statement about data centers in New Hampshire, by speaker

7 more statements on this page

William Hinkle, Eversource spokesman, said Eversource is obligated by law to respond to all developer proposals and has no role in determining whether projects are allowed to interconnect if they receive required approvals

September 2, 2026, WMUR · WMUR local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

Granite Shore Power said no decisions have been made about redevelopment use of nearly 400 acre property

September 2, 2026, WMUR · WMUR local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

Governor Kelly Ayotte told News 9 on Wednesday that she will include a data center moratorium in upcoming budget in House Bill 2

September 2, 2026, WMUR · WMUR local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

New Hampshire Consumer Advocate Donald Kreis reported developer considering data center project of up to 200 MW for Bow

September 1, 2026, New Hampshire Bulletin · New Hampshire Bulletin local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

Also reported by 1 source: WMUR local outlet

Governor of New Hampshire

New Hampshire Governor Kelly Ayotte stated I support a moratorium on data center construction in New Hampshire because too many unknowns surround these facilities

September 1, 2026, New Hampshire Bulletin · New Hampshire Bulletin local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

Also reported by 1 source: The Boston Globe local outlet

Bow Select Board Chairman Kip McDaniel said data centers can be valued very highly and that in a property tax based state that can be hugely beneficial

September 1, 2026, New Hampshire Bulletin · New Hampshire Bulletin local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

Eversource Energy spokesperson William Hinkle said the utility is concerned about possible effects of large load data center developments on the grid

September 1, 2026, New Hampshire Bulletin · New Hampshire Bulletin local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

The site

Where in Merrimack County is not in the public record. The pin marks the county seat, not a building, and the outline is the county.

  • This record: Proposed, ringed
  • data center
  • Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
  • Smaller pins: 3 other published records in New Hampshire
Details
  • this record's location, ringed
  • parcel outline, from the county parcel record
  • city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
  • county boundary

The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.

Where
Bow, Merrimack County, New Hampshire
How exactly it is located
County level, the county seat
The parcel
No parcel outline in the public record
Nearest homes
Not computed for a record placed at a place center
Nearest records
Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at a county seat.

Questions about this project

5 questions answered from the record

Answered from the rows on this page.

How big is Bow Data Center (350 MW)?

The record has 2 measures of its size: 350 MW (not disclosed) and 343 acres (third party estimate, source). Each figure names who gave it and links to the source.

Who is building Bow Data Center (350 MW)?

Not disclosed. No source on file names the developer. The sources read for this record are listed under Sources.

How much power and water does Bow Data Center (350 MW) say it needs?

Power: 350 MW (not disclosed). Water: not disclosed by any source on file.

What has Bow or Merrimack County decided about it?

No decision by Bow or Merrimack County about data centers is on the record. The Merrimack County page and the New Hampshire scorecard list every rated row the day a person publishes one.

Sources

Primary documents first: filings, minutes, dockets and official pages. Then reporting. The numbers are the ones the entries above cite.

Reporting

  1. Possible hyperscale data center eyed for Bow - New Hampshire Bulletin, New Hampshire Bulletin, September 1, 2026, local outlet
  2. Bow in talks to become site of new data center - concordmonitor.com, concordmonitor.com, September 1, 2026, local outlet
  3. ‘Please, do not allow this to happen’: Residents call for proactive steps to prevent data center in Bow, Concord Monitor, September 23, 2026, local outlet
  4. Tax relief or environmental threat? Bow residents divided over possible data center - concordmonitor.com, concordmonitor.com, September 4, 2026, local outlet
  5. Company asks Eversource to assess potential 350 MW facility in Bow - WMUR, WMUR, September 2, 2026, local outlet

5 sources on file.

Cite this record

Data Center Record, "Bow Data Center (350 MW)", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/bow-data-center-350-mw-nh, last verified September 25, 2026.

Last verified , first recorded . Every correction is logged on the corrections page and under What happened.

Cite this page

Data Center Record, "Bow Data Center (350 MW)", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/bow-data-center-350-mw-nh. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.

The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.

Report a change
For researchers
Slug
bow-data-center-350-mw-nh
Status value
rumored
Stage
Proposed
Tier
skeleton
Tags
skeleton
Place id
us/nh/merrimack-county/bow
Coordinates
43.20667, -71.53806
Location precision
county
Location source
County seat (Concord), Wikidata, placed at county level
Coordinate source
wikidata county seat
Location source number
Not disclosed
Location last verified
September 16, 2026
EPA registry id
Not disclosed
Use type values
not_disclosed
Tenancy value
not_disclosed
Cooling type value
not_disclosed
Capacity basis
not_disclosed
Water basis
not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
Acreage basis
third_party_estimate
Interconnection value
not_disclosed
Capacity, if disclosed
350 MW, not disclosed
Rating of the county's rows
Not disclosed
Published
2026-09-05
Last verified
2026-09-25