Data Center Record.

The sourced public record of data center development.

UT · Box Elder County

Stratos Project

waiting on permits Depth record

O'Leary Digital and the Military Installation Development Authority propose a data center campus with an onsite natural gas power plant on about 40,000 acres of unincorporated land in Hansel Valley, north of the Great Salt Lake, after Box Elder County commissioners consented to the MIDA project area on 2026-05-04.

Last verified

Where it stands
waiting on permits
Who is building it
O'Leary Digital
How much power it needs
9 GW
What it is for
AI, type not stated, Cloud, Government and defense
Who it serves
Multi tenant
First recorded
September 4, 2026

Location is approximate. This record is placed at a county centroid because a parcel or address level location is not in the public record.

The site

Colors are how each place treats data centers, from open to closed; pins are projects, colored by where each stands. Tap once for the summary, again to open the record.

Details

Colors show how each state treats data centers, from open to closed, based on the rules its counties and cities have passed. A state takes the color of its strictest rule. Grey means we have records there but no rule yet.

Pins are projects. The color says where each one stands, from rumored to running; the size says how much power it would use, where that has been disclosed. A hollow pin means we know the town but not the exact site.

Tap a state to see its counties and projects. Tap a pin for the quick facts, and tap again to open its full record.

Rating scale
  • Open green
  • Case by case yellow
  • Restrictive orange
  • Closed red
  • No published rating

A state's rating is the most restrictive published jurisdiction rating in the state. Ratings sit on the jurisdictions themselves in the state view. A county or city shaded grey has at least one record.

Status enum
  • rumored rumored
  • proposed proposed
  • waiting on permits permitting
  • approved approved
  • being built under_construction
  • running operational
  • stalled stalled
  • cancelled cancelled
  • approximate location (city or county centroid)

Pin radius is 7 pixels where capacity is not disclosed, and scales from 7 to 18 pixels between 0 and 1,000 MW where it is.

This site
  • the record's location
  • parcel outline, from the county parcel record
  • county boundary

Other pins are the published projects in the same state. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.

How exactly it is located
county centroid
The parcel
No parcel outline in the public record
Nearest homes
Not computed

No distance to homes is computed for a record placed at a centroid, because a distance from an approximate point would be an estimate. Other pins are the published projects in UT; tap one for its summary.

What has been disclosed

FigureValueWho says soSource
How much power it needs 9 GW not disclosed
How much water it would use Not disclosed
How loud it would be Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs Not disclosed
Tax it would pay each year Not disclosed

Each figure says who gave it. The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Nothing here is estimated by the record. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.

What it is for and whom it serves

Tenancy
Multi tenant
Tenants
Not disclosed
Promises to the community
Leaseback agreements for grazing, ranching and farming on the project land; AI curriculum with local schools
Source
midaut.org

What happened, and when

  1. Reported September 1, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    Kevin O'Leary, backed by investor, plans to rename Hansel Valley to Wonder Valley csmonitor.com, query feed

  2. Reported September 1, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    The Stratos Project was approved in May by an obscure Utah commission csmonitor.com, query feed

  3. Reported September 1, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    The Stratos Project is set to take over 20,000 acres of desert brush and farmland in Box Elder County, abutting the Great Salt Lake csmonitor.com, query feed

  4. Reported August 27, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    A hyperscale data center was proposed in Box Elder County and faced opposition sltrib.com, query feed

  5. Reported August 21, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    Another fire is burning north of the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge sltrib.com, query feed

  6. Reported August 21, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    The Salt Wells Fire is burning in Box Elder County's Hansel Valley, where the Stratos data center and energy campus is planned sltrib.com, query feed

  7. Reported August 20, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    Litigation over referendum challenging Box Elder County Commission's vote to consent to MIDA project area has complicated future of Stratos utahnewsdispatch.com, query feed

  8. Reported August 20, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    Cox proposed changes to MIDA in 2025 but they did not pass utahnewsdispatch.com, query feed

  9. August 20, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    The Military Installation Development Authority gave an initial green light to the Stratos data center project in Box Elder County utahnewsdispatch.com, query feed

  10. August 20, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    Governor Spencer Cox said at his monthly news conference that the Stratos approval process was not good and that he would push legislation to reform the Military Installation Development Authority, including a larger role for the governor's office. fox13now.com, local outlet

  11. Reported August 19, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    Box Elder County commissioners approved the plan in May despite vocal opposition finance.yahoo.com, query feed

  12. Reported August 19, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    Stratos project was originally pitched at up to 9 gigawatts across a 40,000 acre site near the Great Salt Lake finance.yahoo.com, query feed

  13. Reported August 13, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    O'Leary agreed to cut the project by half to 20,000 acres after public outcry moneywise.com, query feed

  14. Reported August 13, 2026 (source date; the content gives no date of its own) waiting on permits

    The project was initially proposed at 40,000 acres moneywise.com, query feed

  15. June 10, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    Box Elder County commissioners passed a 180 day moratorium on new data centers and data center power plants on unincorporated county land, which county officials said does not apply to the Stratos project area under MIDA's land use authority. upr.org, local outlet

  16. May 28, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    Box Elder County Attorney Stephen R. Hadfield rejected three referendum applications, finding the commission's resolutions were administrative actions that cannot be referred to voters under Utah law. utahnewsdispatch.com, local outlet

  17. May 23, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    Hundreds of people rallied on the Utah Capitol steps demanding a halt to the project, with speakers raising air quality, greenhouse gas and water supply concerns. utahnewsdispatch.com, local outlet

  18. May 22, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    The second water right change application for the project, filed by Murray Hollow L.C., was withdrawn by a notice dated May 22 that gave no reason, after nearly 700 protest letters had been filed against it. ksl.com, local outlet

  19. May 14, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    Demonstrators rallied at the Utah Capitol and delivered a letter signed by about 6,000 people asking Governor Spencer Cox to take binding action on the Great Salt Lake and the project. sltrib.com, local outlet

  20. May 11, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    The Box Elder Accountability Referendum filed two referendum applications to put the county commission's approval before voters, which would require 5,422 signatures in 45 days if the applications were accepted. fox13now.com, local outlet

  21. May 8, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    Kevin O'Leary told CNN that developers had invested about 20 million dollars, would seek letters of intent from tenants and further investment for a project that could cost more than 100 billion dollars, and aimed to have the first gigawatt operating within two years. cnn.com, local outlet

  22. May 5, 2026 (content date) waiting on permits

    The first water right change application for the project, filed by the landowner to move water from irrigation to industrial use, was withdrawn, and the company said it would refile with additional supporting information. upr.org, local outlet

  23. May 4, 2026 (content date) approved

    Box Elder County commissioners voted unanimously for two resolutions consenting to a Military Installation Development Authority project area for a 40,000 acre data center campus with its own natural gas power plant, at a special meeting attended by about 1,100 people. utahnewsdispatch.com, local outlet

Newest first. Earlier entries are never overwritten; each carries the source it rests on. The badge on each entry is the status the record moved to.

Corrections to this record

  1. · the draft of a history entry

    Restates the MIDA initial approval already on the record as row 464 (Utah News Dispatch, August 20); folded into that row with the outlet as a citation (2026-09-13). The old and new text.

  2. · the draft of a history entry

    Restates the MIDA initial approval already on the record as row 464 (Utah News Dispatch, August 20); folded into that row with the outlet as a citation (2026-09-13). The old and new text.

  3. · the draft of a history entry

    Restates the MIDA initial approval already on the record as row 464 (Utah News Dispatch, August 20); folded into that row with the outlet as a citation (2026-09-13). The old and new text.

  4. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  5. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  6. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  7. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  8. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  9. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  10. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  11. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  12. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  13. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  14. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  15. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  16. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  17. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  18. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  19. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  20. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  21. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  22. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  23. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  24. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  25. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  26. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  27. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  28. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  29. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  30. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  31. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  32. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  33. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  34. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  35. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

  36. · the draft of a history entry

    Duplicate of the row the card names, written by the repeated checklist Apply of 2026-09-13; returned to draft. The old and new text.

Sources

Primary documents

Reporting

30 sources on file. Primary documents are filings, minutes, dockets and official pages; reporting is how an event was found, and the document is what gets cited where one exists.

This page as data CSVJSON
Cite this page

Data Center Record, "Stratos Project", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/stratos-box-elder-ut. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.

The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.

Report a change
For researchers
Slug
stratos-box-elder-ut
Status value
permitting
Tier
depth
Place id
us/ut/box-elder-county
Coordinates
41.6226233, -113.060252
Location precision
county_centroid
Location source
U.S. Census Bureau TIGERweb, Counties layer, Box Elder County (GEOID 49003) internal point. https://tigerweb.geo.census.gov/arcgis/rest/services/TIGERweb/State_County/MapServer/1/query?where=STATE%3D%2749%27+AND+BASENAME%3D%27Box+Elder%27&outFields=*&returnGeometry=false&f=json . The site is unincorporated land in Hansel Valley with no street address; the county project area map PDF has not been traced.
Coordinate source
Not disclosed
Use type values
ai_unspecified, cloud, government_defense
Capacity basis
not_disclosed
Water basis
not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
Published
2026-09-04
Last verified
2026-09-13