Lex Developments proposed a $2.6 billion AI data center in Pocatello; the city council upheld denial of the project and the developer filed a reconsideration request, accused the city of due process violations, and vowed to sue. It is reported; the record holds no sourced date for when it reached that stage.
How much power it needs, how much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.
How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.
What is known
Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.
Land
Not disclosed
Power it would draw
Not disclosed
Water
Not disclosed
Who leads it
Lex Developments
as stated by the source
Who would use it
Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs
Not disclosed
Tax each year
Not disclosed
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)
Impact figures
Field
Value
Who says so
Source
Last verified
How much power it needs
Not disclosed
How much water it would use
Not disclosed
How loud it would be
Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs
Not disclosed
Tax it would pay each year
Not disclosed
The record's fields
Field
Value
Who says so
Source
Last verified
Who is building it
Lex Developments
as stated by the source
September 17, 2026
Who is constructing it
Not disclosed
How much land
Not disclosed
Where its power comes from
Not disclosed
Grid connection
Not disclosed
How it is cooled
Not disclosed
The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.
the record's rules: the sentence copied its source, was about its headline or carried a number the card's facts do not; written again from the card's facts, on the editor's word The old and new text.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
central Idaho director for the Idaho Conservation League
Josh Johnson, Idaho Conservation League, stated that the Stratos data center in Box Elder County, Utah is predicted to need at least 7 gigawatts of energy, which is more than twice the current energy consumption of the entire state of Utah.
July 13, 2026, Idaho Business Review · Idaho Business Reviewlocal outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)
The site
Where in Bannock County is not in the public record. The pin marks the county seat, not a building, and the outline is the county.
Tap a pin for the data center, the parcel for its record
This record: Proposed, ringed
data center
Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
Smaller pins: 3 other published records in Idaho
Details
this record's location, ringed
parcel outline, from the county parcel record
city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
county boundary
The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.
Where
Pocatello, Bannock County, Idaho
How exactly it is located
County level, the county seat
The parcel
No parcel outline in the public record
Nearest homes
Not computed for a record placed at a place center
Nearest records
Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at a county seat.
Who is building Lex Developments Pocatello AI Data Center?
Lex Developments is the developer. No construction contractor is named on the record yet.
How much power and water does Lex Developments Pocatello AI Data Center say it needs?
Power: not disclosed by any source on file. Water: not disclosed by any source on file.
Where does Lex Developments Pocatello AI Data Center stand today?
It is reported; the date it reached that stage is not sourced, only the day a page was read. No dated entry is on the record yet.
What has Pocatello or Bannock County decided about it?
Pocatello: City Council affirms denial of Hoku data center a second time (reported September 22, 2026, source). 1 event is on the county's rows; a rule about the area is not a decision about this record.
Sources
Primary documents first: filings, minutes, dockets and official pages. Then reporting. The numbers are the ones the entries above cite.
Data Center Record, "Lex Developments Pocatello AI Data Center", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/lex-developments-pocatello-ai-data-center-id, last verified September 17, 2026.
Data Center Record, "Lex Developments Pocatello AI Data Center", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/lex-developments-pocatello-ai-data-center-id. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.
The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.