Data Center Record.

Reported Built from one source

Leola Data Center

A data center project in Leola is undergoing permitting, with McPherson County postponing approval of a conditional use permit and state regulators and the county board set to decide its fate, while a potential settlement over powering the facility was reported. It is reported, as reported September 2, 2026.

How much power it needs, how much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.

Last verified · 7 sources, 0 primary · A skeleton record: built from one source, not yet reviewed in depth by a person. · How to read this page

How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.

What is known

Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.

Land
Not disclosed
Power it would draw
Not disclosed
Water
Not disclosed
Who leads it
Not disclosed
Who would use it
Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs
Not disclosed
Tax each year
Not disclosed
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)

Impact figures

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
How much power it needs Not disclosed
How much water it would use Not disclosed
How loud it would be Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs Not disclosed
Tax it would pay each year Not disclosed

The record's fields

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
Who is building it Not disclosed
Who is constructing it Not disclosed
How much land Not disclosed
Where its power comes from Not disclosed
Grid connection Not disclosed
How it is cooled Not disclosed

The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.

Still not public, and where it would show up

The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.

  • Water useA state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
  • Who would use itA lease announcement or a tenant named in a filing.
  • Power the campus would drawA utility or public service commission docket, an interconnection filing, or an air permit for an on site plant.
  • Who is behind itA land record, a zoning application or a company's own announcement.
  • Jobs and taxAn incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.

What was decided

Acts of McPherson County and Leola about data centers, on the record with their source. A rule about the area is not a decision about this record.

DateWhoDecisionSource
McPherson County case by case McPherson County Commission, acting as county Board of Adjustment, will decide on conditional use permit for Leola Data Center yahoo.com
McPherson County case by case McPherson County Planning and Zoning Commission voted to postpone a decision following an executive session at a special meeting dakotanewsnow.com

What happened

  1. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    In 2023, South Dakota PUC approved Montana Dakota Utilities request to establish new rate available to data center type facilities housing high density computer processing technology [1]

  2. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Montana Dakota Utilities would provide electricity to Leola Data Center in second half of 2027 [1]

  3. (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Construction could start this fall after conditional use permit received [1]

  4. · Status: rumored (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Leola Data Center is a 50 megawatt facility proposed in a one story building 120 feet wide by 400 feet long at 116th Street and 358th Avenue, about four miles west of Leola [1]

The full Leola Data Center timeline, in order

14 corrections to this record

Every correction, with its reason
  1. · the status of a projects row

    The stage was set by timeline entries that were returned to draft on 2026-09-17 (they had been published onto the record while it was still a draft skeleton). With no published entry behind it the record reads rumored until one is approved. The old and new text.

  2. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  3. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  4. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  5. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  6. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  7. · the draft of a status history row

    Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

  8. · the draft of a status history row

    Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

  9. · the draft of a status history row

    Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

  10. · the draft of a status history row

    Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

  11. · the draft of a status history row

    Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

  12. · the draft of a status history row

    Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

  13. · the draft of a status history row

    Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

  14. · the draft of a status history row

    Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

Every correction on the record is on the corrections page.

What was said

Democratic candidates and PUC candidate Frank Kloucek called for one year moratorium on new data centers
Frank Kloucek, Democratic PUC candidate · September 2, 2026 · paraphrased · Yahoo national outlet

Every statement about data centers in South Dakota, by speaker

The site

Where in McPherson County is not in the public record. The pin marks the county seat, not a building, and the outline is the county.

  • This record: Proposed, ringed
  • data center
  • Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
  • Smaller pins: 2 other published records in South Dakota
Details
  • this record's location, ringed
  • parcel outline, from the county parcel record
  • city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
  • county boundary

The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.

Where
Leola, McPherson County, South Dakota
How exactly it is located
County level, the county seat
The parcel
No parcel outline in the public record
Nearest homes
Not computed for a record placed at a place center
Nearest records
Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at a county seat.

Questions about this project

4 questions answered from the record

Answered from the rows on this page.

Who is building Leola Data Center?

Not disclosed. No source on file names the developer. The sources read for this record are listed under Sources.

How much power and water does Leola Data Center say it needs?

Power: not disclosed by any source on file. Water: not disclosed by any source on file.

What has Leola or McPherson County decided about it?

McPherson County (rated case by case): McPherson County Commission, acting as county Board of Adjustment, will decide on conditional use permit for Leola Data Center (reported September 2, 2026, source); and McPherson County: McPherson County Planning and Zoning Commission voted to postpone a decision following an executive session at a special meeting (reported August 11, 2026, source). 2 events are on the county's rows; a rule about the area is not a decision about this record.

Sources

Primary documents first: filings, minutes, dockets and official pages. Then reporting. The numbers are the ones the entries above cite.

Reporting

  1. State regulators, county board to decide Leola Data Center’s fate - Yahoo, Yahoo, September 2, 2026, local outlet
  2. Leola Data Center electricity to be served by MDU; next faces county permitting, South Dakota Public Broadcasting, September 9, 2026, local outlet
  3. McPherson County Postpones Approval Of Leola Data Center Conditional Use Permit - Aberdeen Insider, Aberdeen Insider, September 4, 2026, local outlet
  4. Potential Settlement Reached Over Powering McPherson County Data Center - Dakota News Network, Dakota News Network, September 3, 2026, local outlet
  5. State regulators, county board to decide Leola data center’s fate - KELOLAND.com, KELOLAND.com, September 2, 2026, local outlet
  6. McPherson County officials want legal assurances on data center pledges - The Dakota Scout, The Dakota Scout, September 7, 2026, local outlet
  7. Leola Data Center, Senate Candidates on Wounded Knee Medals | Sept. 9 - SDPB, SDPB, September 9, 2026, local outlet

7 sources on file.

Cite this record

Data Center Record, "Leola Data Center", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/leola-data-center-sd, last verified September 17, 2026.

Last verified , first recorded . Every correction is logged on the corrections page and under What happened.

Cite this page

Data Center Record, "Leola Data Center", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/leola-data-center-sd. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.

The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.

Report a change
For researchers
Slug
leola-data-center-sd
Status value
rumored
Stage
Proposed
Tier
skeleton
Tags
skeleton
Place id
us/sd/mcpherson-county/leola
Coordinates
45.72111, -98.93861
Location precision
county
Location source
County seat (Leola), Wikidata, placed at county level
Coordinate source
wikidata county seat
Location source number
Not disclosed
Location last verified
September 16, 2026
EPA registry id
Not disclosed
Use type values
not_disclosed
Tenancy value
not_disclosed
Cooling type value
not_disclosed
Capacity basis
not_disclosed
Water basis
not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
Acreage basis
Not disclosed
Interconnection value
not_disclosed
Capacity, if disclosed
Not disclosed
Rating of the county's rows
Case by case
Published
2026-09-05
Last verified
2026-09-17