T5 Data Centers Silicon Valley Newark Facility
Newark, Alameda County, CADeveloper: T5 Data CentersCensus GEOID 06001
- Stage
- Running
- Undisclosed in public filings
- Land, Water
T5 Data Centers operates its 160,000 square foot T5 Silicon Valley wholesale data center at 39800 Eureka Drive in Newark, Alameda County, California, with 14 MW of power capacity. It is running; the record holds no sourced date for when it reached that stage.
How much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.
Tap a pin for the data center, the parcel for its record
- This record: Running, ringed
- data center
- Smaller pins: 68 other published records in California
Details
- this record's location, ringed
- parcel outline, from the county parcel record
- city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
- county boundary
The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.
How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.
What is known
Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.
- Power it would draw
- 14 MW the developer's figure About 0 percent of New York City's summer peak demand in 2024.
- [1] t5datacenters.com
- Who leads it
- T5 Data Centers as stated by the source
- Undisclosed in public filings
- Land, Water, Who would use it, Jobs once it runs, Tax each year
The math behind the comparison
- T5 Data Centers Silicon Valley Newark Facility, capacity: 14 MW.
- New York City (NYISO Zone J) summer peak demand, actual, 2024: 10,245 MW (2024).
- 14 ÷ 10,245 = 0 (MW over MW).
Sources:
- T5 Data Centers (opens in a new tab)
- NYISO, 2025 Load and Capacity Data Report (Gold Book) (opens in a new tab), Table I-4a, Baseline Summer Non-Coincident Peak Demand, Historical and Forecast, page 26, Zone J, 2024 row (2024)
A comparison is arithmetic on two published rows and is never a new fact (how comparisons are made).
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)
Impact figures
| Field | Value | Who says so | Source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How much power it needs | 14 MW | the developer's figure | [1] t5datacenters.com (opens in a new tab) | October 27, 2026 |
| How much water it would use | ||||
| How loud it would be | ||||
| Jobs once it runs | ||||
| Tax it would pay each year |
The record's fields
| Field | Value | Who says so | Source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who is building it | T5 Data Centers | as stated by the source | October 27, 2026 | |
| Who is constructing it | ||||
| How much land | ||||
| Buildings | 1 building | operator page, verified October 27, 2026 | [1] t5datacenters.com (opens in a new tab) | October 27, 2026 |
| Where its power comes from | ||||
| Grid connection | ||||
| How it is cooled |
A blank value cell means not disclosed by any source on file; a blank basis cell means the source gave the figure without saying on what basis.
The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.
Still not public, and where it would show up
The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.
- Water use A state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
- Who would use it A lease announcement or a tenant named in a filing.
- Jobs and tax An incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.
What was decided
Acts of Alameda County and Newark about data centers, on the record with their source. A rule about the area is not a decision about this record.
| Date | Who | Decision | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oakland | Oakland approved a 45 day moratorium on data centers to study effects and take community feedback into account | patch.com (opens in a new tab) | |
| Oakland | On October 6, 2026, the Oakland City Council approved an urgency 45 day moratorium freezing new data center construction permits while staff drafts environmental, grid load, and backup emission rules. | oaklandca.gov (opens in a new tab) | |
| Oakland | Oakland is considering a moratorium of its own | kalw.org (opens in a new tab) |
October 6, 2026 Oakland, CA Oakland City Council 45 Day Data Center Moratorium Vote
On October 6, 2026, the Oakland City Council approved an urgency 45 day moratorium freezing new data center construction permits while staff drafts environmental, grid load, and backup emission rules.
- Oakland City Council Member Elected Official auto captions, unchecked
"city tonight to impose a temporary freeze on new data center construction. Good evening, everyone. I'm Mike Mibach. >> And I'm Claudine Wong. And [snorts] it is not just Oakland. Leaders in San Francisco and Los Angeles also stepping back tonight to evaluate the footprint of developing these facilities in their communities. >> And we begin in Oakland with KTVU's Zach Sos after attending tonight's vote. Zach. >> And tonight we heard from residents both"
- Resident public comment Resident Public Comment auto captions, unchecked
"for and against the moratorium. Those against the moratorium talking about the economic benefits that would come with data centers. Those for the moratorium talking about the environmental impacts that could come as well. >> We demand people's moratorium on data centers in the city of Oakland. >> Protesters rallying outside Oakland City Hall Tuesday as the council considered whether or not to implement a 45 day"
- Oakland City Council Member Elected Official auto captions, unchecked
"land and energy use, as well as impacts on water and air quality, at the heart of the debate. >> Well, my concern about it being in Oakland is that uh we have limited water from the Mokelumne River in the Sierra Nevada. If um we We're already taking up to 60 to 70% of that river out of the river for human use. If we increase water use here, that will take more and"
Using this data in a report? Support the record.
September 15, 2026 Hayward, CA Hayward City Council Regular Meeting
Hayward Mayor Mark Salinas and Council Members Syrop and Andrews introduced Item 21, a City Council Referral directing municipal staff to return with ordinance options prohibiting or strictly limiting data center development in Hayward.
- Mark Salinas, Mayor, City of Hayward Elected Official auto captions, unchecked
"certainly a draw. So uh thank you for that. Um, if there are no other oral reports, um, I will then move on to, uh, council referrals, which is item number 21, city council referral, prohibition data center development referral from Mayor Selenas, Council Member Cyrup, and Council Member"
- Hayward Development Services Staff Board & Planning Staff auto captions, unchecked
"happy to see you all here. Um, I'm going to provide a brief presentation related to the city council referral outlining actions to limit or further regulate data centers data center development in Hayward. So on August 12th, citing significant community outcry um related to the approval of the stack data center and then concerns about health and environmental risks related to"
- Hayward City Council Member Elected Official auto captions, unchecked
"uh, City Hall. Welcome to the Hayward City Council meeting. Today is September 15th, 2026. And also, today we launch National Latino Heritage Month. >> So, let's pop it up for National Latino Heritage Month. Um, I'd like to call this meeting to order. And if I can call upon council"
Using this data in a report? Support the record.
What happened
No dated entry is on the record yet.
-
Read on October 27, 2026 (the day the page was read; it gives no date of its own)
Verified facility status from California state agency permits, utility dockets, municipal planning filings, or operator campus specifications.
The site
The pin is the site's address.
- Where
- 39800 Eureka Drive, Newark, CA 94560, Newark, Alameda County, California [1] t5datacenters.com (opens in a new tab)
- How exactly it is located
- Exact, at the address
- The parcel
- No parcel outline in the public record
- Nearest homes
- Not computed for a record placed at a place center
- Nearest records
- Digital Realty Fremont Data Center (SJC22), 4.2 mi
- Hurricane Electric Fremont Carrier Hotel Campus (FMT1 and FMT2), 4.4 mi
- Equinix SV4 Sunnyvale Data Center, 7.4 mi
- Serverfarm Santa Clara Data Center (SV1), 7.8 mi
- CoreSite Milpitas Data Center (SV2), 8.0 mi
Keep going
Questions about this project
5 questions answered from the record
How big is T5 Data Centers Silicon Valley Newark Facility?
-
The record has 2 measures of its size: 14 MW (the developer's figure, t5datacenters.com (opens in a new tab)) and 1 building (operator page, verified October 27, 2026, t5datacenters.com (opens in a new tab)). Its acreage is not disclosed.
Who is building T5 Data Centers Silicon Valley Newark Facility?
-
T5 Data Centers is the developer. No construction contractor is named on the record yet.
How much power and water does T5 Data Centers Silicon Valley Newark Facility say it needs?
-
Power: 14 MW (the developer's figure, t5datacenters.com (opens in a new tab)). Water: not disclosed by any source on file.
Where does T5 Data Centers Silicon Valley Newark Facility stand today?
-
It is running; the date it reached that stage is not sourced, only the day a page was read. No dated entry is on the record yet.
What has Newark or Alameda County decided about it?
-
Oakland: Oakland approved a 45 day moratorium on data centers to study effects and take community feedback into account (reported October 7, 2026, patch.com (opens in a new tab)); and Oakland: On October 6, 2026, the Oakland City Council approved an urgency 45 day moratorium freezing new data center construction permits while staff drafts environmental, grid load, and backup emission rules, oaklandca.gov (opens in a new tab). 3 events are on the county's rows; a rule about the area is not a decision about this record.
Sources
Reporting
- T5 Data Centers Silicon Valley Newark Facility Official Disclosure (opens in a new tab), T5 Data Centers, query feed
1 source on file.
About this data
Last verified , first recorded . Every correction is logged on the corrections page. Report a correction · Send a tip about T5 Data Centers Silicon Valley Newark Facility
Cite this page
Data Center Record, "T5 Data Centers Silicon Valley Newark Facility", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/t5-data-centers-t5siliconvalley-newark-ca. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY-NC 4.0.
The structured rows are CC BY-NC 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Commercial use needs a license. Prose stays under copyright.
For researchers
- Stage
- Running
- Tier
- built from one source
- Tags
- Built from one source
- Coordinates
- 37.5168, -121.9942
- How the location is known
- Location from the site's street address.
- Location source
- https://t5datacenters.com/
- Coordinate source
- Alameda County Assessor / T5 Silicon Valley specification
- How capacity was disclosed
- the developer's figure
- Capacity, if disclosed
- 14 MW, the developer's figure
- Published
- October 21, 2026
- Last verified
- October 27, 2026
- Undisclosed in public filings
- Location source number, Location last verified, EPA registry id, Uses, Tenancy, Cooling, How water was disclosed, How acreage was disclosed, Interconnection, Rating of the county's rows