How big is Prosper data center ($500M)?

The record has one measure of its size: 37.3 acres (third party estimate, source). Its power capacity is not disclosed.

Who is building Prosper data center ($500M)?

Not disclosed. No source on file names the developer. The sources read for this record are listed under Sources.

Who will use Prosper data center ($500M)?

Not disclosed. No source on file names a tenant, says whether the site is single or multi tenant, or states what it is for. The record keeps the use as not disclosed until one does; see Who it serves.

How much power and water does Prosper data center ($500M) say it needs?

Power: not disclosed by any source on file. Water: not disclosed by any source on file.

Where does Prosper data center ($500M) stand today?

It is cancelled, as reported September 9, 2026. The newest entry, reported September 9, 2026: White Rose Partners withdrew $580 million Prosper data center proposal due to intense community opposition and zoning rejection [3].

What has Prosper or Collin County decided about it?

No decision by Prosper or Collin County about data centers is on the record. The Collin County page and the Texas scorecard list every rated row the day a person publishes one.

What is still unknown about Prosper data center ($500M)?

Not disclosed by any source on file: how much power it needs, how much water it would use, how loud it would be, jobs once it runs, tax it would pay each year, who is building it, who is constructing it, where its power comes from, grid connection, how it is cooled. No missing primary document is listed for this record yet; What the record lacks is where one appears when a person names it.

Cancelled Built from one source

Prosper data center ($500M)

A $500 million data center project in Prosper had its rezoning request unanimously denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, though the project may not be dead. It is cancelled, as reported September 9, 2026.

How much power it needs, how much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.

Last verified September 25, 2026 · 7 sources, 0 primary · A skeleton record: built from one source, not yet reviewed in depth by a person. · How to read this page

How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.

What is known

Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.

Land: 37.3 acres; third party estimate [4]
Power it would draw: Not disclosed
Water: Not disclosed
Who leads it: Not disclosed
Who would use it: Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs: Not disclosed
Tax each year: Not disclosed

Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)

Impact figures

Field	Value	Who says so	Source	Last verified
How much power it needs	Not disclosed
How much water it would use	Not disclosed
How loud it would be	Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs	Not disclosed
Tax it would pay each year	Not disclosed

The record's fields

Field	Value	Who says so	Source	Last verified
Who is building it	Not disclosed
Who is constructing it	Not disclosed
How much land	37.3 acres	third party estimate	[4] constructionreviewonline.com	September 25, 2026
Where its power comes from	Not disclosed
Grid connection	Not disclosed
How it is cooled	Not disclosed

Jobs once it runs, also reported: 20 to 50 jobs, 2026 (constructionreviewonline.com: Developer estimated 20 to 50 permanent jobs for the region.) .

Tax it would pay each year, also reported: 2,500,000 USD, 2026 (constructionreviewonline.com: Developers estimated $2.5 million in annual sales and franchise tax revenue for Prosper.) .

The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.

Still not public, and where it would show up

The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.

Water useA state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
Who would use itA lease announcement or a tenant named in a filing.
Power the campus would drawA utility or public service commission docket, an interconnection filing, or an air permit for an on site plant.
Who is behind itA land record, a zoning application or a company's own announcement.
Jobs and taxAn incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.

What happened

Reported September 9, 2026 · Status: stalled or cancelled (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

White Rose Partners withdrew $580 million Prosper data center proposal due to intense community opposition and zoning rejection [3]

The full Prosper data center ($500M) timeline, in order

7 corrections to this record

3 source tier relabels, September 23
1 record field corrected, September 23
3 history entries taken off this record, September 17

Every correction, with its reason

September 23, 2026 · the status of a projects row

The stage was set by timeline entries that were returned to draft on 2026-09-17 (they had been published onto the record while it was still a draft skeleton). With no published entry behind it the record reads rumored until one is approved. The old and new text.
September 23, 2026 · the kind of source of a history entry

The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
September 23, 2026 · the kind of source of a history entry

The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
September 23, 2026 · the kind of source of a history entry

The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
September 17, 2026 · the draft of a status history row

Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
September 17, 2026 · the draft of a status history row

Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
September 17, 2026 · the draft of a status history row

Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

Every correction on the record is on the corrections page.

What was said

David Bristol, Prosper Mayor, spoke against Project Tomahawk as a private resident, calling for denial because there were no local or state guidelines for data centers.

David Bristol, Prosper Mayor · September 1, 2026 · paraphrased · constructionreviewonline.com local outlet

Every statement about data centers in Texas, by speaker

The site

Where in Collin County is not in the public record. The pin marks the county seat, not a building, and the outline is the county.

This record: Stalled or cancelled, ringed
data center
Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
Smaller pins: 53 other published records in Texas

Details

this record's location, ringed
parcel outline, from the county parcel record
city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
county boundary

The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.

Where: Prosper, Collin County, Texas
How exactly it is located: County level, the county seat
The parcel: No parcel outline in the public record
Nearest homes: Not computed for a record placed at a place center
Nearest records: Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at a county seat.

Comparisons

2 metrics with more than one figure

Every figure on the record for the same thing, the record's own or the document's first, each with who gave it, its date and its basis.

Permanent jobs

1 figure, 1 source

Not disclosedNot disclosed

No filing or developer document on the record states one.

20 to 50 jobsEstimate

constructionreviewonline.com, Sep 1, 2026

Show each source's words

20 to 50 jobs, constructionreviewonline.com: Developer estimated 20 to 50 permanent jobs for the region.

Tax each year

1 figure, 1 source

Not disclosedNot disclosed

No filing or developer document on the record states one.

2,500,000 USDEstimate

constructionreviewonline.com, Sep 1, 2026

Show each source's words

2,500,000 USD, constructionreviewonline.com: Developers estimated $2.5 million in annual sales and franchise tax revenue for Prosper.

Keep going

The county Collin County 5 projects on the record. The state Data centers in Texas Every Texas project, the rules on the record and what comes next.

Questions about this project

7 questions answered from the record

Answered from the rows on this page.

How big is Prosper data center ($500M)?: The record has one measure of its size: 37.3 acres (third party estimate, source). Its power capacity is not disclosed.
Who is building Prosper data center ($500M)?: Not disclosed. No source on file names the developer. The sources read for this record are listed under Sources.
Who will use Prosper data center ($500M)?: Not disclosed. No source on file names a tenant, says whether the site is single or multi tenant, or states what it is for. The record keeps the use as not disclosed until one does; see Who it serves.
How much power and water does Prosper data center ($500M) say it needs?: Power: not disclosed by any source on file. Water: not disclosed by any source on file.
Where does Prosper data center ($500M) stand today?: It is cancelled, as reported September 9, 2026. The newest entry, reported September 9, 2026: White Rose Partners withdrew $580 million Prosper data center proposal due to intense community opposition and zoning rejection [3].
What has Prosper or Collin County decided about it?: No decision by Prosper or Collin County about data centers is on the record. The Collin County page and the Texas scorecard list every rated row the day a person publishes one.
What is still unknown about Prosper data center ($500M)?: Not disclosed by any source on file: how much power it needs, how much water it would use, how loud it would be, jobs once it runs, tax it would pay each year, who is building it, who is constructing it, where its power comes from, grid connection, how it is cooled. No missing primary document is listed for this record yet; What the record lacks is where one appears when a person names it.

Sources

Primary documents first: filings, minutes, dockets and official pages. Then reporting. The numbers are the ones the entries above cite.

Reporting

Developer scrapes data center plan for Prosper, Texas, YouTube, September 8, 2026, query feed
White Rose spikes $500M Prosper data center proposal after elected official pushback - The Real Deal, The Real Deal, September 9, 2026, query feed
Developer withdraws proposed $580M data center plan in Prosper - Audacy, Audacy, September 9, 2026, local outlet
Prosper Commission Recommends Denial for $580M Project Tomahawk Data Center in Texas, constructionreviewonline.com, September 1, 2026, local outlet
Prosper P&Z votes against $500 million data center but project may not be dead - The Business Journals, The Business Journals, September 4, 2026, local outlet
Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously denies controversial data center rezoning request - wfaa.com, wfaa.com, September 2, 2026, local outlet
Developer behind proposed "Project Tomahawk" data center in North Texas town withdraws - CBS News, CBS News, September 8, 2026, local outlet

7 sources on file.

Cite this record

Data Center Record, "Prosper data center ($500M)", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/prosper-data-center-500m-tx, last verified September 25, 2026.

Last verified September 25, 2026, first recorded September 4, 2026. Every correction is logged on the corrections page and under What happened.

Download this record (CSV) JSON Report a correction Send a tip about Prosper data center ($500M)

Cite this page

Data Center Record, "Prosper data center ($500M)", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/prosper-data-center-500m-tx. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.

The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.

Report a change

For researchers

Slug: prosper-data-center-500m-tx
Status value: cancelled
Stage: Stalled or cancelled
Tier: skeleton
Tags: skeleton
Place id: us/tx/collin-county/prosper
Coordinates: 33.2, -96.63333
Location precision: county
Location source: County seat (McKinney), Wikidata, placed at county level
Coordinate source: wikidata county seat
Location source number: Not disclosed
Location last verified: September 16, 2026
EPA registry id: Not disclosed
Use type values: not_disclosed
Tenancy value: not_disclosed
Cooling type value: not_disclosed
Capacity basis: not_disclosed
Water basis: not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
Acreage basis: third_party_estimate
Interconnection value: not_disclosed
Capacity, if disclosed: Not disclosed
Rating of the county's rows: Not disclosed
Published: 2026-09-04
Last verified: 2026-09-25