Haaland noted that while the majority of New Mexicans she speaks with are not in favor of nuclear power, developers have increasingly proposed building small nuclear reactors on site to power data centers
Project Jupiter
Oracle's Project Jupiter, proposed for Santa Teresa in Doña Ana County, is one of the largest proposed AI data center complexes in the nation and is stalled in permitting amid New Mexico Supreme Court stays on water and air quality permits and broad community opposition. It is reported, since September 24, 2026.
How much water it would use has not been disclosed.
How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.
What is known
Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.
- Land
- 1,400 acres
- third party estimate [1]
- Power it would draw
- 2.45 GW
- third party estimate [33]
- Water
- Not disclosed
- Who leads it
- Oracle
- as stated by the source
- Who would use it
- OpenAI, Oracle
- as the source names them [32]
- Jobs once it runs
- Not disclosed
- Tax each year
- Not disclosed
- Where its power comes from
- Oracle-controlled power delivery
- as stated by the source [47]
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)
Impact figures
| Field | Value | Who says so | Source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How much power it needs | 2.45 GW | third party estimate | [33] theenergymag.com | October 6, 2026 |
| How much water it would use | Not disclosed | |||
| How loud it would be | Not disclosed | |||
| Jobs once it runs | Not disclosed | |||
| Tax it would pay each year | Not disclosed |
The record's fields
| Field | Value | Who says so | Source | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who is building it | Oracle | as stated by the source | October 6, 2026 | |
| Who is constructing it | Not disclosed | |||
| How much land | 1,400 acres | third party estimate | [1] datacenterdynamics.com | October 6, 2026 |
| Where its power comes from | Oracle-controlled power delivery | as stated by the source | [47] linkedin.com | October 6, 2026 |
| Grid connection | Not disclosed | |||
| How it is cooled | Not disclosed |
How much power it needs, also reported: 2.45 GW, 2026 (Seeking Alpha: Project Jupiter is designed to handle 2.45 gigawatts of power., Investing.com: Project Jupiter has a capacity of 2.45 gigawatts., Yahoo Finance: Project Jupiter designed to handle 2.45 gigawatts of power); 2.5 GW, 2026 (Data Center Dynamics: Project Jupiter is a 2.5GW data center campus in New Mexico) .
Jobs once it runs, also reported: 4,000 jobs, 2026 (Source New Mexico: Project Jupiter would create 4,000 construction jobs according to campaign materials); 1,500 jobs, 2026 (Source New Mexico: Project Jupiter would create up to 1,500 long term jobs according to campaign materials) .
The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.
Still not public, and where it would show up
The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.
- Water useA state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
- Jobs and taxAn incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.
What happened
-
(content date)
Oracle issued a force majeure notice to STACK Infrastructure on September 24, allowing it to protect itself contractually if Project Jupiter fails to launch as planned in 2028 [50]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
A natural gas pipeline needed for the facility has faced delays after permit denials [38]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sent a contractual notice tied to Project Jupiter seeking protection if construction delays disrupt its 2028 target [38]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sent a force majeure notice to Blue Owl Capital unit seeking to delay payments if data center fails to come online in 2028 [32]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Energy Transfer pipeline delayed to February 1, 2027 after regulatory denials. [48]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Project planned to come online in 2028. [48]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sent force majeure notice to Blue Owl Capital on Project Jupiter after energy permit denial and pipeline delay. [48]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle says Project Jupiter construction remains on schedule despite force majeure notice. [49]
35 earlier entries
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle declared force majeure over possible power delays to Project Jupiter data center in New Mexico to delay transition to higher rent payments. [49], also Межа. Новини України. local outlet
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Increased scrutiny followed by denial of a key permit raised questions about whether the data center will come online as planned [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sent Blue Owl a force majeure notice about Project Jupiter data center in New Mexico [29]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Green Chile pipeline was delayed from August 2026 target to February 2027 after New Mexico State Land Office denied right of way permits. [35]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle issued a force majeure notice to Blue Owl, the project developer unit, due to facility delays relative to the 2028 launch date. [35]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Project Jupiter's Green Chile natural gas pipeline was delayed from August 2026 to February 2027. [41]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Project Jupiter has a 2028 launch date target. [41]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sent a force majeure notice to Project Jupiter's developer in New Mexico. [41]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sends force majeure notice on Project Jupiter data center in New Mexico [39]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sent force majeure notice to Blue Owl Capital seeking payment deferral if project misses 2028 deadline [1]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle announced as tenant of Project Jupiter in January 2026 [1]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle issued Request for Proposals to develop 2GW of renewable energy capacity in New Mexico for Project Jupiter [1]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Natural gas pipeline extension rejected by state officials in July 2026 [1]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Project has faced denial of key permit amid growing public backlash over power demands and local impacts of massive data centers [42]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle invoked force majeure provision to delay payments if Project Jupiter is delayed and facility does not come online in 2028 [42]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle issued force majeure notice to Project Jupiter developers [40]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Project Jupiter was scheduled to come online in 2028. [34]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sent a force majeure notice to the developer building Project Jupiter due to regulatory hurdles and local opposition. [34]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Natural gas pipeline needed for facility has faced delays after permit denials [38]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Project Jupiter data center in New Mexico targeting 2028 completion [38]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle seeks to defer payments if Project Jupiter fails to come online in 2028 as planned [37]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
New Mexico Supreme Court let permitting resume on September 17, 2026 [36]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Gas pipeline serving site has twice been denied a state land crossing [36]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Natural gas pipeline to serve campus has faced delays and legal challenges involving water and air quality permits [33]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
New Mexico Supreme Court stayed air permit proceeding for proposed microgrid serving campus on Sept. 14 [33]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sends force majeure notice seeking to defer payments if project delays beyond 2028 opening [33]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle data center delay reported in mid day stock market news [31]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle issued force majeure notice on major data center project in New Mexico where it is primary tenant [30]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Oracle sent force majeure notice to Project Jupiter developer seeking to delay payments if data center misses 2028 operational target [28]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
New Mexico Office of the State Engineer authorized emergency drilling in October 2025 [26]
-
(source date; the content gives no date of its own)
S&P downgraded Oracle in July, leaving its corporate rating one notch above junk [27]
-
Moratorium (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Haaland said her moratorium would not affect Project Jupiter, the Oracle- and OpenAI backed artificial intelligence data center campus under construction at the Santa Teresa Industrial Park. [22]
-
Moratorium (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Haaland's moratorium would not affect Project Jupiter, the Oracle- and OpenAI backed artificial intelligence data center campus under construction at the Santa Teresa Industrial Park. [25]
-
Moratorium (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Court unpaused regulatory proceedings that had been frozen since August, allowing air quality permit hearing to move forward [23]
-
· reported (source date; the content gives no date of its own)
Court lifted stay imposed on August 23 that had paused air permit proceeding and water use for Project Jupiter [24]
The full Project Jupiter timeline, in order
116 corrections to this record
Every correction, with its reason
-
· the summary of a record items row
the record's rules: the sentence copied its source, was about its headline or carried a number the card's facts do not; written again from the card's facts, on the editor's word The old and new text.
-
· the summary of a record items row
the record's rules: the sentence copied its source, was about its headline or carried a number the card's facts do not; written again from the card's facts, on the editor's word The old and new text.
-
· the summary of a record items row
the record's rules: the sentence was the source's wording or carried a number not in the card's facts; written again from the article The old and new text.
-
· the capacity mw of a projects row
The capacity read 2.45 MW. The source gave 2.45 gigawatts, and the approval of 2026-09-25 wrote the number without its unit. Corrected to 2,450 MW from the same source. The old and new text.
-
· the status of a projects row
The stage was set by timeline entries that were returned to draft on 2026-09-17 (they had been published onto the record while it was still a draft skeleton). With no published entry behind it the record reads rumored until one is approved. The old and new text.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wyomingpublicmedia.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New Mexico, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row, from the wrapper https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMizgFBVV95cUxNaXQ1dkVJVkJoTHlzOTV3ZFQwRG9pNm1EbGtHYmhDY2EyTEZ0Q3BMTlEzMEd2c2dPUTNRTGxOTlhnRDA2RUlsOVNVQTM1RXhfSTNycmFPbC1yR2x6VjA2OFMtdXFaSlQ3SzFfa0s3ZWtONk1iSmYtcExTYngwVUtZT2NBQXJURldFVTVEcFlrM1kwaU9QWU1zNGtMV2M0VkxLR2VFWjJ0Yk1mVUMycE5WWGNGSTgyTElwYjY0eHUyYl9BeFRVeUttNE5Gd0UtZw. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is santafenewmexican.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New Mexico, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row, from the wrapper https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi8wFBVV95cUxPYjNsbjJZX3NvN0FVTllNSHY1bDE4c1V3cnlnUkV6T2hhdVIxNGNKSUhwcUhWdTAyQlZ0QmQzUFRBWnpOVXlzTURiNWhHWVNwV1NNMDlwM3NudHNyWE10TEMtcFdCZDgySVAwOUlHdXh2NUpXLXYwTXQ0MWpzTEt1Y0VRVWx4cnFGVWM2cFVSc1Y0NEJJWUpmYTkyTXlnMF85SkY5T2JLUFNlT3UwalNKOVR0enZDYkM0Q0dPV19UUVI1RVNFSnlpamZkLXRRNzV1WlJJY3ZjOEp5YTJYdXBZX216eXRnQm55aGdrT3NkMkNlcnM. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is spokesman.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" Michigan, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row, from the wrapper https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMingFBVV95cUxPNHYwNjdFbjlfZXZqQWNvM1JFb0RkbzhKNXFFczhwOWZkZm5ucXhyX2NLcVdnY1NBTHhoVnFOQWxYYVZTTS1HS2dBc1hDWVRzRlV6Yzl3a01ZTFZHYTFzZ1pvbl9kZ3JBLVA1TnFReHY1TGFCbW1XTTIwTjE1VDdhS3RuLVNaLXN2d016WFpKSWlmQ1pPOUJOeXB3WlR4QQ. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wyomingpublicmedia.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New Mexico, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row, from the wrapper https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMizgFBVV95cUxNaXQ1dkVJVkJoTHlzOTV3ZFQwRG9pNm1EbGtHYmhDY2EyTEZ0Q3BMTlEzMEd2c2dPUTNRTGxOTlhnRDA2RUlsOVNVQTM1RXhfSTNycmFPbC1yR2x6VjA2OFMtdXFaSlQ3SzFfa0s3ZWtONk1iSmYtcExTYngwVUtZT2NBQXJURldFVTVEcFlrM1kwaU9QWU1zNGtMV2M0VkxLR2VFWjJ0Yk1mVUMycE5WWGNGSTgyTElwYjY0eHUyYl9BeFRVeUttNE5Gd0UtZw. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is datacenterdynamics.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New Mexico, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 3 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is spokesman.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" Michigan, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is spokesman.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" Michigan, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row, from the wrapper https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMingFBVV95cUxPNHYwNjdFbjlfZXZqQWNvM1JFb0RkbzhKNXFFczhwOWZkZm5ucXhyX2NLcVdnY1NBTHhoVnFOQWxYYVZTTS1HS2dBc1hDWVRzRlV6Yzl3a01ZTFZHYTFzZ1pvbl9kZ3JBLVA1TnFReHY1TGFCbW1XTTIwTjE1VDdhS3RuLVNaLXN2d016WFpKSWlmQ1pPOUJOeXB3WlR4QQ. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wyomingpublicmedia.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New Mexico, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row, from the wrapper https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMizgFBVV95cUxNaXQ1dkVJVkJoTHlzOTV3ZFQwRG9pNm1EbGtHYmhDY2EyTEZ0Q3BMTlEzMEd2c2dPUTNRTGxOTlhnRDA2RUlsOVNVQTM1RXhfSTNycmFPbC1yR2x6VjA2OFMtdXFaSlQ3SzFfa0s3ZWtONk1iSmYtcExTYngwVUtZT2NBQXJURldFVTVEcFlrM1kwaU9QWU1zNGtMV2M0VkxLR2VFWjJ0Yk1mVUMycE5WWGNGSTgyTElwYjY0eHUyYl9BeFRVeUttNE5Gd0UtZw. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is spokesman.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" Michigan, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row, from the wrapper https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMingFBVV95cUxPNHYwNjdFbjlfZXZqQWNvM1JFb0RkbzhKNXFFczhwOWZkZm5ucXhyX2NLcVdnY1NBTHhoVnFOQWxYYVZTTS1HS2dBc1hDWVRzRlV6Yzl3a01ZTFZHYTFzZ1pvbl9kZ3JBLVA1TnFReHY1TGFCbW1XTTIwTjE1VDdhS3RuLVNaLXN2d016WFpKSWlmQ1pPOUJOeXB3WlR4QQ. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the kind of source of a history entry
Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is wyomingpublicmedia.org, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New Mexico, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row, from the wrapper https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMizgFBVV95cUxNaXQ1dkVJVkJoTHlzOTV3ZFQwRG9pNm1EbGtHYmhDY2EyTEZ0Q3BMTlEzMEd2c2dPUTNRTGxOTlhnRDA2RUlsOVNVQTM1RXhfSTNycmFPbC1yR2x6VjA2OFMtdXFaSlQ3SzFfa0s3ZWtONk1iSmYtcExTYngwVUtZT2NBQXJURldFVTVEcFlrM1kwaU9QWU1zNGtMV2M0VkxLR2VFWjJ0Yk1mVUMycE5WWGNGSTgyTElwYjY0eHUyYl9BeFRVeUttNE5Gd0UtZw. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
-
· the draft of a status history row
Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.
Every correction on the record is on the corrections page.
What was said
KR Sridhar, Bloom Energy CEO, stated that Bloom boxes are fungible and can be redirected from one location to another after shipment, unlike conventional power plants
New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez argued the Water Code's narrow emergency exception does not authorize approval without notice and hearing for a change and that the Office of the State Engineer ignored its own guidance.
Every statement about data centers in New Mexico, by speaker
41 more statements on this page
Gregg Hull, Republican gubernatorial nominee, said he does not support a moratorium but believes data centers need to be sited responsibly with accountability for water use, energy impact, and community input
Oracle states Project Jupiter remains on planned schedule despite force majeure notice.
KeyBanc analyst Jackson Ader noted Oracle is in the most tenuous cash position among its rivals, with payment schedules misaligned to actual construction progress.
Clay Magouyrk, co CEO at Oracle, stated neither Project Jupiter sites will have impact on FY 2027 revenue or earnings guidance
Gil Luria, head of technology research at D.A. Davidson, stated that Oracle's New Mexico data center is unlikely to be canceled despite state and local government pushback
company spokesperson
Oracle claimed construction uses non potable water from existing New Mexico water rights holder for dust control and other construction activities.
Republican gubernatorial candidate
Hull said he would require data centers to overbuild power supply by minimum of 20 megawatts and deliver excess energy to grid
Democratic gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland announced support for a statewide moratorium on data centers until they meet an eight part plan including water protections, no utility rate increases and using renewable energy
Republican gubernatorial candidate
Hull cited campaign finance records showing Haaland received over $87,000 in contributions from Oracle and Project Jupiter executives
Republican gubernatorial candidate Gregg Hull said a moratorium is not needed, as state and local governments have protections through permits
Republican gubernatorial candidate
Hull said he would require data centers to build a $50 million desalinization plant to produce water from brackish water
gubernatorial candidate
Republican Gregg Hull said he does not support a statewide moratorium on data centers and believes local governments should make those decisions, with projects evaluated on their own merit.
gubernatorial candidate
Haaland released a list of eight protections for data center development including no backroom deals, no energy rate increases, water protections through closed loop systems, New Mexico jobs and union wages, renewable energy and zero carbon compliance, clean air and habitat protections, decommissioning bonds, and community accountability.
Gregg Hull, Republican candidate for New Mexico governor, said he would use existing laws such as New Mexico's Local Economic Development Act to impose restrictions and negotiate deals with large scale companies
reporting
Haaland's campaign received contributions from entities associated with Project Jupiter, including donations from Oracle executives totalling over 87,000 dollars according to Hull campaign analysis.
gubernatorial candidate
Hull said he supports legislation to protect water and electric rates, including a ban on using potable water and requiring data centers to pay for their own electrical infrastructure.
Republican candidate for New Mexico governor
Hull said he would trust local counties and municipalities to make decisions about data centers in concert with the Economic Development Office, similar to Project Jupiter
Democratic candidate for New Mexico governor
Deb Haaland, Democrat candidate for New Mexico governor, said she would sign an executive order on day one issuing a moratorium on new large scale data center projects until protections are in place
U.S. Senator
Heinrich proposed an alternative bill that would require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to issue rules for data centers using 150 megawatts or more to pay for certain grid upgrades
Democratic gubernatorial nominee
Haaland mentioned geothermal energy as a potential source to power new data centers in New Mexico.
Democratic candidate for New Mexico governor
Haaland said required protections would include data centers building their own renewable energy infrastructure and having robust plans to prevent environmental harms
gubernatorial candidate
Democratic nominee Deb Haaland said she would sign an executive order on day one of her governorship to pause new data centers until the state adopts stronger protections.
gubernatorial candidate
Haaland's eight pronged proposal requires data centers to build their own renewable energy infrastructure, use closed loop cooling systems, require prevailing wage union jobs, meet renewable energy and zero carbon requirements, meet clean air standards, post decommissioning bonds, and comply with community accountability measures.
U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich called for the Senate to pass his GRID Savings Act requiring data centers to pay for their own grid connections and upgrades, opposing voluntary compliance.
Michael Egbert, Oracle spokesperson
BrabenderCox received $3.44 million from Oracle for media production, consulting, and polling related to Project Jupiter
New Mexico Democratic gubernatorial nominee
Deb Haaland, Democratic gubernatorial nominee, said she would sign an executive order to pause all new large scale data center proposals if elected
New Mexico Democratic gubernatorial nominee
Haaland's proposed guardrails include: prohibiting non disclosure agreements; requiring developers to build renewable energy infrastructure; requiring closed loop cooling systems; prioritizing hiring New Mexicans for union jobs; mandating compliance with clean energy goals; adhering to high standards for light pollution and noise; and imposing decommission bonds
Deb Haaland, a Democratic gubernatorial candidate, would support legislation for a statewide data center moratorium and said if elected she would institute a temporary statewide moratorium by executive order on her first day in office.
reporting
Haaland's campaign received contributions from entities involved with Project Jupiter, including a maximum contribution of 12,400 dollars from Oracle America and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure CEO Clay Magouyrk.
New Energy Economy Executive Director
Mariel Nanasi, Executive Director of New Energy Economy, said plaintiffs sought a fair opportunity for public to obtain evidence and test claims before state decides whether to authorize the data center
New Mexico gubernatorial candidate
Deb Haaland said if elected governor she will sign an executive order on day one establishing a moratorium for new large scale data center projects until legislative guardrails are passed, prioritizing local jobs, renewable energy, and water use framework.
Campaign finance reports
Haaland received donations from Oracle and its CEO, developer of Project Jupiter
Gregg Hull, Republican gubernatorial candidate, said a blanket ban on data centers sends the wrong message and prefers local control with statewide protections for water and energy rates, with project by project evaluation.
Republican gubernatorial nominee for governor
Gregg Hull, Republican gubernatorial nominee, said a moratorium signals New Mexico is closed for business and that he prefers to fix guardrails rather than shut down the data center industry
Democratic gubernatorial nominee
Haaland supports a moratorium on new data center development until strong guardrails are established in law and practice.
Democratic gubernatorial nominee
Deb Haaland, Democratic nominee for governor, said during a primary debate in May that data centers do not have the best interests of the community at heart.
David Baake, attorney and energy policy consultant for Western Resource Advocates, told New Mexico lawmakers that Project Jupiter's fuel cell microgrid would emit more than all existing power plants in New Mexico combined
David Baake
Project Jupiter's emissions would put the state back at 2005 levels of CO2 from the electric sector, undoing more than 20 years of progress
David Baake
The Microgrid Oversight Act, state legislation proposed to more closely regulate microgrids and require compliance with Energy Transition Act requirements, died after clearing the Senate
Micaela Lara Cadena, Angelica Rubio, Eleanor Chávez, Carrie Hamblen
The moratorium proposal would pause new large scale data center projects while the state develops rules for water use, energy demand, emissions, ratepayer impacts and community benefits
The site
Where in Doña Ana County is not in the public record. The pin marks the county seat, not a building, and the outline is the county.
Tap a pin for the data center, the parcel for its record
- This record: Proposed, ringed
- data center
- Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
- Smaller pins: 3 other published records in New Mexico
Details
- this record's location, ringed
- parcel outline, from the county parcel record
- city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
- county boundary
The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.
- Where
- Santa Teresa, Doña Ana County, New Mexico
- How exactly it is located
- County level, the county seat
- The parcel
- No parcel outline in the public record
- Nearest homes
- Not computed for a record placed at a place center
- Nearest records
- Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at a county seat.
Comparisons
3 metrics with more than one figure
Capacity at full buildout
3 figures, 5 sourcesSeeking Alpha, Sep 24, 2026; Investing.com, Sep 24, 2026; Yahoo Finance, Sep 24, 2026
Show each source's words
- 2.5 GW, Data Center Dynamics: Project Jupiter is a 2.5GW data center campus in New Mexico
- 2.45 GW, Seeking Alpha: Project Jupiter is designed to handle 2.45 gigawatts of power.
- 2.45 GW, Investing.com: Project Jupiter has a capacity of 2.45 gigawatts.
- 2.45 GW, Yahoo Finance: Project Jupiter designed to handle 2.45 gigawatts of power
Construction jobs
1 figure, 1 sourceShow each source's words
- 4,000 jobs, Source New Mexico: Project Jupiter would create 4,000 construction jobs according to campaign materials
Permanent jobs
1 figure, 1 sourceShow each source's words
- 1,500 jobs, Source New Mexico: Project Jupiter would create up to 1,500 long term jobs according to campaign materials
Questions about this project
7 questions answered from the record
How big is Project Jupiter?
-
The record has 2 measures of its size: 2.45 GW (third party estimate, source) and 1,400 acres (third party estimate, source). Each figure names who gave it and links to the source.
Who is building Project Jupiter?
-
Oracle is the developer. No construction contractor is named on the record yet.
Who will use Project Jupiter?
-
The named tenants are OpenAI, Oracle. No promise to the community is on the record.
How much power and water does Project Jupiter say it needs?
-
Power: 2.45 GW (third party estimate, source). Water: not disclosed by any source on file.
Where does Project Jupiter stand today?
-
It is reported, since September 24, 2026. The newest entry, September 24, 2026: Oracle issued a force majeure notice to STACK Infrastructure on September 24, allowing it to protect itself contractually if Project Jupiter fails to launch as planned in 2028 [50].
What has Santa Teresa or Doña Ana County decided about it?
-
No decision by Santa Teresa or Doña Ana County about data centers is on the record. The Doña Ana County page and the New Mexico scorecard list every rated row the day a person publishes one.
What is still unknown about Project Jupiter?
-
Not disclosed by any source on file: how much water it would use, how loud it would be, jobs once it runs, tax it would pay each year, who is constructing it, grid connection, how it is cooled. No missing primary document is listed for this record yet; What the record lacks is where one appears when a person names it.
Sources
Reporting
- Oracle issues force majeure notice to Blue Owl following series of setbacks at Project Jupiter data center campus , report - Data Center Dynamics, Data Center Dynamics, September 24, 2026, trade press
- Oracle issues RFP for 2GW of new renewable capacity in New Mexico - Data Center Dynamics, Data Center Dynamics, September 9, 2026, trade press
- In New Mexico, massive Project Jupiter data center faces criticism over water allocation - kanw.org, kanw.org, September 4, 2026, local outlet
- NM Supreme Court denies Project Jupiter motion to partially lift stay - Las Cruces Sun-News, Las Cruces Sun-News, September 4, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico attorney general supports petitions challenging Project Jupiter approvals - KOAT, KOAT, September 4, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico attorney general backs environmental groups in Project Jupiter battle - Santa Fe New Mexican, Santa Fe New Mexican, September 4, 2026, local outlet
- NM attorney general backs emergency petitions challenging data center's air, water permits - KFOX, KFOX, September 4, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico AG backs environmental groups challenging Project Jupiter before state Supreme Court - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, September 3, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico Supreme Court pauses Project Jupiter permitting processes - Searchlight New Mexico, Searchlight New Mexico, August 25, 2026, local outlet
- Project Jupiter: New Mexico Supreme Court delivers two blows to Oracle data center - KOB 4, KOB 4, August 25, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico Supreme Court halts Project Jupiter progress - KTSM 9 News, KTSM 9 News, August 24, 2026, local outlet
- US Rep. Stansbury calls on New Mexico agencies to provide Project Jupiter water information - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, August 24, 2026, local outlet
67 more sources
- New Mexico Supreme Court halts water use from Project Jupiter well in Santa Teresa - KFOX, KFOX, August 24, 2026, local outlet
- Opinion: New Mexico lawmaker who backed Project Jupiter now says developers should leave - El Paso Matters, El Paso Matters, August 24, 2026, local outlet
- Doña Ana County residents criticize local, state officials for advancing Project Jupiter - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, August 12, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico State Ethics Commission announces settlement with group behind Project Jupiter mailers - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, August 11, 2026, local outlet
- Hearing for Project Jupiter data center’s air quality permit application rescheduled to September - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, July 31, 2026, local outlet
- Project Jupiter Data Center Unmasks Big Tech’s Playbook - Food & Water Watch, Food & Water Watch, July 23, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico land commissioner blocks Project Jupiter-related pipeline from building on state land - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, July 16, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico pressed pause on what would be one of the country's biggest data centers - Utah Public Radio, Utah Public Radio, September 1, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico lawmakers hear about data centers and water usage concerns - KRQE, KRQE, September 1, 2026, local outlet
- Data center debate enters gubernatorial race, Project Jupiter donations under scrutiny - KOB 4, KOB 4, September 18, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico Supreme Court rejects 2 Project Jupiter challenges, allows permitting process to resume - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, September 17, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico Supreme Court denies petitions regarding Project Jupiter air quality permit, water use - kvia.com, kvia.com, September 17, 2026, local outlet
- Deb Haaland lays out data center policy, including moratorium - lcsun news.com, lcsun-news.com, September 17, 2026, local outlet
- NM Supreme Court lifts two stays, denies petitions regarding Project Jupiter - lcsun news.com, lcsun-news.com, September 18, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle’s $18 Billion New Mexico Data Center Loans Hit A Speed Bump - Finimize, Finimize, September 18, 2026, local outlet
- Bloom Energy slides on reported Oracle data center force majeure - TradingView, TradingView, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- What Does Growing NIMBY ism Mean for Data Center Investing? - ai cio.com, ai-cio.com, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Stock Slides After Company Issued ‘Force Majeure’ Notice For Major Data Center Project - Yahoo Finance UK, Yahoo Finance UK, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Top Midday Stories: Oracle's Data Center Delay; People Withdraws MGM Offer; Revvity's New Diabetes Test - Yahoo Finance, Yahoo Finance, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle shares fall as company invokes 'force majeure' over New Mexico data center project - proactiveinvestors.com, proactiveinvestors.com, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Shares Fall 4% on Reported Bid to Defer Payments on AI Project - TheEnergyMag, TheEnergyMag, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle's force majeure on New Mexico data center sends AI stocks lower - FXStreet, FXStreet, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle triggers force majeure on massive ’Project Jupiter’ data center - Investing.com, Investing.com, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Sends 'Force Majeure' Notice on New Mexico Data Center, Shares Slide 4% - finance.biggo.com, finance.biggo.com, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Stock Falls on Force Majeure Notice for Data Center - Yahoo Finance, Yahoo Finance, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Stock Plunges After Project Jupiter Warning Threatens 2028 AI Data Center Target - TradingView, TradingView, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle shares drop after sending ‘force majeure’ notice on New Mexico data center project - CNBC, CNBC, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Market Chatter: Oracle Cites Force Majeure as New Mexico Data Center Faces Delays - Yahoo Finance, Yahoo Finance, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle sends force majeure notice over New Mexico data center: report (ORCL:NYSE) - Seeking Alpha, Seeking Alpha, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle stock drops as the company moves to shield itself from costs linked to controversial data center - Yahoo Finance, Yahoo Finance, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Water can flow again for construction of massive Project Jupiter data center - KUNR Public Radio, KUNR Public Radio, September 23, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle’s 2 GW Renewable RFP Aims to Offset AI Data Center Emissions in New Mexico - energytech.com, energytech.com, September 10, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle tries to appease Stargate data center opponents with renewables push - Ars Technica, Ars Technica, September 11, 2026, local outlet
- In New Mexico, massive Project Jupiter data center faces criticism over water allocation, Wyoming Public Media, September 8, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Project Delays Spark AI Data Center Debt Concerns - Bisnow, Bisnow, September 25, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Declares Force Majeure on $165 Billion Project Jupiter Data Center - finance.yahoo.com, finance.yahoo.com, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- Stock Market Today, Sept. 24: Oracle Stock Dips As it Issues Force Majeure Notice on Project Jupiter Data Center - The Motley Fool, The Motley Fool, September 24, 2026, local outlet
- AI Data Center Delays Raise New Questions For ORCL, BE And APLD, Says IO Fund , ‘Power, Not Demand, Is Becoming The Bottleneck’ - TradingView, TradingView, October 4, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico pressed pause on what would be one of the country's biggest data centers - Utah Public Radio, Utah Public Radio, September 1, 2026, local outlet
- Project Jupiter developers urge New Mexico Supreme Court to get permit process moving again - Searchlight New Mexico, Searchlight New Mexico, September 3, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Project Jupiter data center work continues amid court fight - El Paso Times, El Paso Times, September 3, 2026, local outlet
- Project Jupiter site work continues, despite high court’s pause on permits - Searchlight New Mexico, Searchlight New Mexico, August 31, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico Supreme Court halts AI data center permit process, handing residents a rare win - The Cool Down, The Cool Down, August 30, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico nonprofits weigh Project Jupiter cash amid local data center pushback - Technical.ly, Technical.ly, August 28, 2026, local outlet
- New Mexico Justices Pause Permit, Hearing For Data Center - Law360, Law360, August 25, 2026, local outlet
- Contested New Mexico hearing officer for Project Jupiter air quality permit hearing recuses himself - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, August 24, 2026, local outlet
- NM Supreme Court temporarily halts Project Jupiter air quality permit hearing - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, August 24, 2026, local outlet
- Protesters 'shame' New Mexico public officials over data center | Local News - Santa Fe New Mexican, Santa Fe New Mexican, August 21, 2026, local outlet
- NM residents protest pending Project Jupiter air quality permit outside Environment Department - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, August 21, 2026, local outlet
- Environmental group asks NM Supreme Court to pause Project Jupiter’s air quality permit hearing - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, August 19, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Data Center’s Pipeline Plan Is Rerouted After Rejections - energynow.com, energynow.com, August 18, 2026, local outlet
- Proposed gas pipeline for Project Jupiter data center delayed to 2027, filings show - Source New Mexico, Source New Mexico, August 17, 2026, local outlet
- Pipeline for $165 Billion Oracle Data Center Delayed to Next Year - The Next Web, The Next Web, August 14, 2026, local outlet
- ‘All about money’: Las Cruces senators push back on Project Jupiter at crowded forum - Searchlight New Mexico, Searchlight New Mexico, August 13, 2026, local outlet
- Doña Ana County to hear Oracle, Bloom Energy update on Project Jupiter data center - kfoxtv.com, kfoxtv.com, September 7, 2026, local outlet
- Project Jupiter: where the AI data center project stands in NM - The Daily Lobo, The Daily Lobo, August 17, 2026, local outlet
- NM Supreme Court pauses Project Jupiter air permit - Albuquerque Journal, Albuquerque Journal, August 23, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle's $165 Billion Data Center Plan Hits a Gas Pipeline Delay - Crude Oil Prices Today | OilPrice.com, Crude Oil Prices Today | OilPrice.com, August 14, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle updates Doña Ana County on Project Jupiter data center - Albuquerque Journal, Albuquerque Journal, September 9, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Launches Call For 2 GW Renewable Energy Capacity - TaiyangNews, TaiyangNews, September 9, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle seeks up to 2 GW of new renewable power for Project Jupiter in Doña Ana County - KFOX, KFOX, September 9, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Plans Public Environmental Dashboard for Project Jupiter - eponline.com, eponline.com, September 10, 2026, local outlet
- Tech deploys charm offensive to combat AI data center backlash - The Spokesman Review, The Spokesman-Review, August 19, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle Co CEO Clay Magouyrk Says Data Center Delays Are Not a Problem - Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) - Benzinga, Benzinga, September 11, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle and OpenAI bet that more solar could combat data center pushback - Latitude Media, Latitude Media, September 11, 2026, local outlet
- Erin Brockovich weighs in on Project Jupiter data center - Yahoo, Yahoo, September 11, 2026, local outlet
- Oracle to Launch Public Dashboard with Emissions, Water Use Data for New Hyperscale Data Center - ESG Today, ESG Today, September 14, 2026, local outlet
79 sources on file.
Cite this record
Data Center Record, "Project Jupiter", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/project-jupiter-santa-teresa-nm, last verified October 6, 2026.
Cite this page
Data Center Record, "Project Jupiter", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/project-jupiter-santa-teresa-nm. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.
The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.
For researchers
- Slug
- project-jupiter-santa-teresa-nm
- Status value
- rumored
- Stage
- Proposed
- Tier
- skeleton
- Tags
- skeleton
- Place id
- us/nm/dona-ana-county/santa-teresa
- Coordinates
- 32.31403, -106.77981
- Location precision
- county
- Location source
- County seat (Las Cruces), Wikidata, placed at county level
- Coordinate source
- wikidata county seat
- Location source number
- Not disclosed
- Location last verified
- September 16, 2026
- EPA registry id
- Not disclosed
- Use type values
- not_disclosed
- Tenancy value
- not_disclosed
- Cooling type value
- not_disclosed
- Capacity basis
- third_party_estimate
- Water basis
- not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
- Acreage basis
- third_party_estimate
- Interconnection value
- not_disclosed
- Capacity, if disclosed
- 2.45 GW, third party estimate
- Rating of the county's rows
- Not disclosed
- Published
- 2026-09-05
- Last verified
- 2026-10-06