Data Center Record.

Reported In courtBuilt from one source

MARA Granbury (former Wolf Hollow site)

MARA Holdings took over the former Wolf Hollow site near Granbury in 2024; residents filed a noise suit in Hood County in October 2024 and the Hood County Commissioners Court declined a one year data center moratorium on February 11, 2026. Skeleton from the litigation packet of 2026-09-09. It is reported, as reported May 4, 2026. Residents sued MARA Holdings over Bitcoin mining noise at the Granbury site (reported May 4, 2026).

How much power it needs, how much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.

Last verified · 2 sources, 0 primary · A skeleton record: built from one source, not yet reviewed in depth by a person. · How to read this page

How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.

What is known

Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.

Land
Not disclosed
Power it would draw
Not disclosed
Water
Not disclosed
Who leads it
MARA Holdings
as stated by the source
Who would use it
Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs
Not disclosed
Tax each year
Not disclosed
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)

Impact figures

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
How much power it needs Not disclosed
How much water it would use Not disclosed
How loud it would be Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs Not disclosed
Tax it would pay each year Not disclosed

The record's fields

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
Who is building it MARA Holdings as stated by the source September 17, 2026
Who is constructing it Not disclosed
How much land Not disclosed
Where its power comes from Not disclosed
Grid connection Not disclosed
How it is cooled Not disclosed

The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.

Still not public, and where it would show up

The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.

  • Water useA state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
  • Who would use itA lease announcement or a tenant named in a filing.
  • Power the campus would drawA utility or public service commission docket, an interconnection filing, or an air permit for an on site plant.
  • Jobs and taxAn incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.

What was decided

Acts of Hood County and Granbury about data centers, on the record with their source. A rule about the area is not a decision about this record.

DateWhoDecisionSource
Hood County restrictive Conservative voters in Hood County are voting for Democrats or sitting out elections due to opposition to data centers texasstandard.org
Hood County restrictive In Hood County, Texas, residents have been fighting multiple proposed data center projects cbsnews.com

What happened

  1. · In court (source date; the content gives no date of its own)

    Residents sued MARA Holdings over Bitcoin mining noise at the Granbury site [2]

The full MARA Granbury (former Wolf Hollow site) timeline, in order

The site

Where in Hood County is not in the public record. The pin marks the county seat, not a building, and the outline is the county.

  • This record: Proposed, ringed
  • data center
  • Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
  • Smaller pins: 53 other published records in Texas
Details
  • this record's location, ringed
  • parcel outline, from the county parcel record
  • city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
  • county boundary

The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.

Where
Granbury, Hood County, Texas
How exactly it is located
County level, the county seat
The parcel
No parcel outline in the public record
Nearest homes
Not computed for a record placed at a place center
Nearest records
Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at a county seat.

Keep going

The county Hood County 2 projects on the record. The state Data centers in Texas Every Texas project, the rules on the record and what comes next.

Questions about this project

4 questions answered from the record

Answered from the rows on this page.

Who is building MARA Granbury (former Wolf Hollow site)?

MARA Holdings is the developer. No construction contractor is named on the record yet.

How much power and water does MARA Granbury (former Wolf Hollow site) say it needs?

Power: not disclosed by any source on file. Water: not disclosed by any source on file.

Where does MARA Granbury (former Wolf Hollow site) stand today?

It is reported, as reported May 4, 2026. The newest entry, reported May 4, 2026: Residents sued MARA Holdings over Bitcoin mining noise at the Granbury site [2].

What has Granbury or Hood County decided about it?

Hood County (rated restrictive): Conservative voters in Hood County are voting for Democrats or sitting out elections due to opposition to data centers (reported September 14, 2026, source); and Hood County: In Hood County, Texas, residents have been fighting multiple proposed data center projects (reported September 3, 2026, source). 2 events are on the county's rows; a rule about the area is not a decision about this record.

Sources

Primary documents first: filings, minutes, dockets and official pages. Then reporting. The numbers are the ones the entries above cite.

Reporting

  1. Crypto firm Mara sued over 'data center noise and dead chickens', www.datacenterdynamics.com, May 20, 2026, trade press
  2. Texas Residents Sue MARA Holdings Over Bitcoin Mining Noise, decrypt.co, May 4, 2026, local outlet

2 sources on file.

Cite this record

Data Center Record, "MARA Granbury (former Wolf Hollow site)", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/mara-granbury-data-center-tx, last verified September 17, 2026.

Last verified , first recorded . Every correction is logged on the corrections page.

Download this record (CSV) JSON Report a correction Send a tip about MARA Granbury (former Wolf Hollow site)
Cite this page

Data Center Record, "MARA Granbury (former Wolf Hollow site)", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/mara-granbury-data-center-tx. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.

The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.

Report a change
For researchers
Slug
mara-granbury-data-center-tx
Status value
rumored
Stage
Proposed
Tier
skeleton
Tags
court, skeleton
Place id
us/tx/hood-county/granbury
Coordinates
32.44194, -97.78139
Location precision
county
Location source
County seat (Granbury), Wikidata, placed at county level
Coordinate source
wikidata county seat
Location source number
Not disclosed
Location last verified
September 16, 2026
EPA registry id
Not disclosed
Use type values
not_disclosed
Tenancy value
not_disclosed
Cooling type value
not_disclosed
Capacity basis
not_disclosed
Water basis
not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
Acreage basis
Not disclosed
Interconnection value
not_disclosed
Capacity, if disclosed
Not disclosed
Rating of the county's rows
Restrictive
Published
2026-09-10
Last verified
2026-09-17