Data Center Record.

Reported Built from one source

ICE Detention Center Surprise

An ICE detention center in Surprise remains paused as an environmental review makes slow progress. It is reported; the record holds no sourced date for when it reached that stage.

How much power it needs, how much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.

Last verified · 1 source, 0 primary · A skeleton record: built from one source, not yet reviewed in depth by a person. · How to read this page

How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.

What is known

Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.

Land
Not disclosed
Power it would draw
Not disclosed
Water
Not disclosed
Who leads it
Not disclosed
Who would use it
Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs
Not disclosed
Tax each year
Not disclosed
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)

Impact figures

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
How much power it needs Not disclosed
How much water it would use Not disclosed
How loud it would be Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs Not disclosed
Tax it would pay each year Not disclosed

The record's fields

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
Who is building it Not disclosed
Who is constructing it Not disclosed
How much land Not disclosed
Where its power comes from Not disclosed
Grid connection Not disclosed
How it is cooled Not disclosed

The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.

Still not public, and where it would show up

The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.

  • Water useA state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
  • Who would use itA lease announcement or a tenant named in a filing.
  • Power the campus would drawA utility or public service commission docket, an interconnection filing, or an air permit for an on site plant.
  • Who is behind itA land record, a zoning application or a company's own announcement.
  • Jobs and taxAn incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.

What was decided

Acts of Maricopa County and Surprise about data centers, on the record with their source. A rule about the area is not a decision about this record.

DateWhoDecisionSource
Gilbert Gilbert leaders want strict rules on data centers to make it hard for server farms to set up shop; new rules expected in September but delayed to October or November. watereducation.org
Chandler Chandler capped data center water use youtube.com
Maricopa County Maricopa County adopted a new ordinance clarifying guidelines for data center development bizjournals.com
Maricopa County It is the first time data centers have been defined in county zoning rules kjzz.org
Maricopa County The modernized ordinance updated how the county defines a data center and restricts them to industrial areas kjzz.org
Maricopa County Maricopa County Board of Supervisors overhauled its zoning ordinance at a meeting Wednesday in December 2025 kjzz.org
7 earlier decisions on the county's rows
DateWhoDecisionSource
Mesa restrictive Mesa data centers will need City Council approval to build under new regulations kjzz.org
Mesa restrictive New Mesa zoning amendments direct data centers to heavy industrial zones and general industrial zones kjzz.org
Mesa restrictive Mesa data center ordinance restricts future projects to land zoned for industrial use themesatribune.com
Mesa restrictive Mesa City Council adopted new zoning rules for data centers and their operations in a City Council vote in July 2025 kjzz.org
Mesa restrictive Mesa City Council unanimously approved data center amendments on July 8, 2025, with two members absent themesatribune.com
Mesa restrictive Proposed 60 foot height limit for data centers themesatribune.com
Mesa restrictive Proposed 400 foot setback from residential areas for data centers themesatribune.com

What happened

No dated entry is on the record yet.

The site

Where in Maricopa County is not in the public record. The pin marks the county seat, not a building, and the outline is the county.

  • This record: Proposed, ringed
  • data center
  • Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
  • Smaller pins: 27 other published records in Arizona
Details
  • this record's location, ringed
  • parcel outline, from the county parcel record
  • city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
  • county boundary

The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.

Where
Surprise, Maricopa County, Arizona
How exactly it is located
County level, the county seat
The parcel
No parcel outline in the public record
Nearest homes
Not computed for a record placed at a place center
Nearest records
Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at a county seat.

Questions about this project

4 questions answered from the record

Answered from the rows on this page.

Who is building ICE Detention Center Surprise?

Not disclosed. No source on file names the developer. The sources read for this record are listed under Sources.

How much power and water does ICE Detention Center Surprise say it needs?

Power: not disclosed by any source on file. Water: not disclosed by any source on file.

Where does ICE Detention Center Surprise stand today?

It is reported; the date it reached that stage is not sourced, only the day a page was read. No dated entry is on the record yet.

What has Surprise or Maricopa County decided about it?

Gilbert: Gilbert leaders want strict rules on data centers to make it hard for server farms to set up shop; new rules expected in September but delayed to October or November. (reported September 23, 2026, source); and Chandler: Chandler capped data center water use (reported June 22, 2026, source). 13 events are on the county's rows; a rule about the area is not a decision about this record.

Sources

Primary documents first: filings, minutes, dockets and official pages. Then reporting. The numbers are the ones the entries above cite.

Reporting

  1. ICE detention center in Surprise still paused as environmental review makes slow progress, KJZZ, September 4, 2026, local outlet

1 source on file.

Cite this record

Data Center Record, "ICE Detention Center Surprise", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/ice-detention-center-surprise-az, last verified September 17, 2026.

Last verified , first recorded . Every correction is logged on the corrections page.

Cite this page

Data Center Record, "ICE Detention Center Surprise", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/ice-detention-center-surprise-az. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.

The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.

Report a change
For researchers
Slug
ice-detention-center-surprise-az
Status value
rumored
Stage
Proposed
Tier
skeleton
Tags
skeleton
Place id
us/az/maricopa-county/surprise
Coordinates
33.44833, -112.07389
Location precision
county
Location source
County seat (Phoenix), Wikidata, placed at county level
Coordinate source
wikidata county seat
Location source number
Not disclosed
Location last verified
September 16, 2026
EPA registry id
Not disclosed
Use type values
not_disclosed
Tenancy value
not_disclosed
Cooling type value
not_disclosed
Capacity basis
not_disclosed
Water basis
not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
Acreage basis
Not disclosed
Interconnection value
not_disclosed
Capacity, if disclosed
Not disclosed
Rating of the county's rows
Restrictive
Published
2026-09-04
Last verified
2026-09-17