Data Center Record.

Reported Built from one source

GNM New York PoP at Tribeca

GNM switched on a New York point of presence at a Tribeca data center. It is reported; the record holds no sourced date for when it reached that stage.

How much power it needs, how much water it would use and who would use it have not been disclosed.

Last verified · 3 sources, 0 primary · A skeleton record: built from one source, not yet reviewed in depth by a person. · How to read this page

How to read this page. Every fact links to the source it rests on; a number in brackets is its place in the source list. A figure no source gives reads Not disclosed, and nothing is estimated. Where sources give different figures, each is shown with who gave it, and another source's figure never stands in for the record's own. Entries are added and never overwritten; corrections are listed under What happened.

What is known

Each figure as its source gave it. The number in brackets is its place in the source list.

Land
Not disclosed
Power it would draw
Not disclosed
Water
Not disclosed
Who leads it
GNM
as stated by the source
Who would use it
Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs
Not disclosed
Tax each year
Not disclosed
Every field, with who said it and when (Researcher view)

Impact figures

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
How much power it needs Not disclosed
How much water it would use Not disclosed
How loud it would be Not disclosed
Jobs once it runs Not disclosed
Tax it would pay each year Not disclosed

The record's fields

FieldValueWho says soSourceLast verified
Who is building it GNM as stated by the source September 17, 2026
Who is constructing it Not disclosed
How much land Not disclosed
Where its power comes from Not disclosed
Grid connection Not disclosed
How it is cooled Not disclosed

The developer's figure is what the company said; what a permit allows is the ceiling a permit sets; measured means observed. Water is in gallons a day or a year, whichever the source stated; a tax claim given as a range shows both ends, each linked to the source that gave it.

Still not public, and where it would show up

The record adds each the day a source gives it. Why these documents.

  • Water useA state water right filing or a water supply agreement.
  • Who would use itA lease announcement or a tenant named in a filing.
  • Power the campus would drawA utility or public service commission docket, an interconnection filing, or an air permit for an on site plant.
  • Jobs and taxAn incentive agreement, a county's economic development filing or a fiscal note.

What happened

No dated entry is on the record yet.

8 corrections to this record

Every correction, with its reason
  1. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  2. · the kind of source of a history entry

    The source was labeled with the Google News search that found it; it now carries its outlet's tier (the record's rules of 2026-09-23). The link did not change. The day's label corrections.

  3. · the kind of source of a history entry

    Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is nypost.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New York, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.

  4. · the kind of source of a history entry

    Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is w.media, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New York, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 3 on 1 row of sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.

  5. · the kind of source of a history entry

    Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is nypost.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New York, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.

  6. · the kind of source of a history entry

    Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is nypost.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New York, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.

  7. · the kind of source of a history entry

    Tier after resolution (2026-09-21). The source on file is nypost.com, the publisher's own page. The item reached the record through Google News: "data center" New York, which the record carries at tier 1, and the approve copied the feed's tier onto this row. The tier now comes from the outlet, which the record already carries at tier 4 on 1 row of monitoring_sources. DECISIONS section 7. The speaker, the claim, the date and the url are unchanged. The day's label corrections.

  8. · the draft of a status history row

    Published on a project that was still a draft skeleton and still short of the record's skeleton minimum rule; returned to draft on 2026-09-17 pending the project meeting the rule or a person's approval. The old and new text.

Every correction on the record is on the corrections page.

What was said

Gottlieb claims moratorium creates uncertainty that will drive investment to Texas, Virginia and other states
Bryan Gottlieb, ENR online editor · July 21, 2026 · paraphrased · Engineering News-Record local outlet
New York Senate Bill sponsored by Sen. Kristen Gonzalez would have created a new electricity rate class for data centers, mandated public comment periods, and required public disclosure of power use and water consumption
Kristen Gonzalez, New York State Senator · July 15, 2026 · paraphrased · National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) local outlet

Every statement about data centers in New York, by speaker

4 more statements on this page

ENR online editor

Bryan Gottlieb argues New York moratorium sidelines permitting process designed for environmental scrutiny

July 21, 2026, Engineering News-Record · Engineering News-Record local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

Kathy Hochul, Governor of New York

Governor said she will require future data centers to supply their own power or pay premium to tap into state grid

July 15, 2026, WWNY · WWNY local outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

Governor Hochul opposes any tax subsidies for AI data centers

July 14, 2026, CBS News · CBS News national outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

Kathy Hochul, Governor

New York requires data centers to produce their own energy or pay premium for accessing state grid

July 14, 2026, CBS News · CBS News national outlet · the record (Paraphrased; said in the source itself)

The site

Where in New York is not in the public record. The pin marks the center of New York, not a building, and the outline is Kings County.

  • This record: Proposed, ringed
  • data center
  • Dashed edge: the exact site is not in the public record
  • Smaller pins: 10 other published records in New York
Details
  • this record's location, ringed
  • parcel outline, from the county parcel record
  • city limits, U.S. Census Bureau, on a town level record
  • county boundary

The other pins are the published projects in the same state, each in its stage color. The imagery beneath is the USGS national orthoimagery, public domain, shown so the land around the site can be read.

Where
New York, Kings County, New York
How exactly it is located
Town level, the center of the city
The parcel
No parcel outline in the public record
Nearest homes
Not computed for a record placed at a place center
Nearest records
Nearest records are not computed for a record placed at the center of its town.

Questions about this project

4 questions answered from the record

Answered from the rows on this page.

Who is building GNM New York PoP at Tribeca?

GNM is the developer. No construction contractor is named on the record yet.

How much power and water does GNM New York PoP at Tribeca say it needs?

Power: not disclosed by any source on file. Water: not disclosed by any source on file.

Where does GNM New York PoP at Tribeca stand today?

It is reported; the date it reached that stage is not sourced, only the day a page was read. No dated entry is on the record yet.

What has New York or Kings County decided about it?

No decision by New York or Kings County about data centers is on the record. The Kings County page and the New York scorecard list every rated row the day a person publishes one.

Sources

Primary documents first: filings, minutes, dockets and official pages. Then reporting. The numbers are the ones the entries above cite.

Reporting

  1. GNM switches on New York PoP at Tribeca data center - W.Media, W.Media, September 1, 2026, local outlet
  2. New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits - Engineering News-Record, Engineering News-Record, July 14, 2026, local outlet
  3. GNM switches on New York PoP at Tribeca data center - W.Media, W.Media, September 1, 2026, local outlet

3 sources on file.

Cite this record

Data Center Record, "GNM New York PoP at Tribeca", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/gnm-new-york-pop-at-tribeca-ny, last verified September 17, 2026.

Last verified , first recorded . Every correction is logged on the corrections page and under What happened.

Cite this page

Data Center Record, "GNM New York PoP at Tribeca", https://datacenterrecord.org/projects/gnm-new-york-pop-at-tribeca-ny. Data: Data Center Record, datacenterrecord.org, CC BY 4.0.

The structured rows are CC BY 4.0. Link to this page; that is what turns a reuse into a citation. Prose stays under copyright.

Report a change
For researchers
Slug
gnm-new-york-pop-at-tribeca-ny
Status value
rumored
Stage
Proposed
Tier
skeleton
Tags
skeleton
Place id
us/ny/kings-county/new-york
Coordinates
40.6624941, -73.9389041
Location precision
city
Location source
City centroid (New York), U.S. Census Bureau TIGERweb, public domain, placed at city level
Coordinate source
tigerweb city centroid
Location source number
Not disclosed
Location last verified
September 17, 2026
EPA registry id
Not disclosed
Use type values
not_disclosed
Tenancy value
not_disclosed
Cooling type value
not_disclosed
Capacity basis
not_disclosed
Water basis
not_disclosed, gallons_per_day
Acreage basis
Not disclosed
Interconnection value
not_disclosed
Capacity, if disclosed
Not disclosed
Rating of the county's rows
Not disclosed
Published
2026-09-05
Last verified
2026-09-17